Negative reviews are not the problem.
I understand the point of view that if one doesn't have any experience with Flash, he/she has no right to instruct the person who made it on how to improve the project, as it is obviously very frustrating to the authors to be handed shit by somebody who barely knows what they are talking about.
However what you seem to be talking about, is if a person who never made a flash has no right to leave a bad review? I have seen some of your films, and I definitely can make my own judgement whether I liked them or not, even though I know as much about Flash or drawing as I do about Tom Fulp's anus, or care to know in particular. But I can very well able to give you constructive criticism based on the actual quality of content in the movie or amusement, as you like to refer it "obvious stuff". So basically, you are bitching about anyone who gives you a low score and negative remarks in their review? What the hell is the point of making a flash that you expect everyone to vote 10 on, just because you whined them into it? Besides, most films that deserve so, usually get their due's worth, and you shouldn't be surprised that crappy movies such as yours receive low scores and annoying long rants like this one. Anyways be thankful that you wasted my time into actually writing a modestly coherent review and not just jumbled a bunch of inept letters together like 90% of reviewers do on this site: "omg u fag u insluted linkin prak i iz so lyke gawna git u dawn i kno wer u lif tell me wer u lif so i clud cawm and fuk wid ur mawm."