You are 100% right
I agree with you
Reviews for "-FREE WHISTLE POINTS-"
i understand the point that you are coming from
However, there are some things that should be blammed, or things that were just thrown together from scratch in 30 minutes or so, that do deserve comments such as the ones that you were stating in your flash. I also agree with the fact that because people have not taken the time to make flashes they shouldnt judge quality as harsh as the ones who have taken the time. Im not saying that people should be perfectionists, I am just stating that if they are going to submit something they should make sure that they thouroughly enjoy it, and it people have a problem with it then thats their fault. It should just be ignored. I have not seen any of your flashes so i cannot judge any of your flashes from past experiences. I am not saying that stating your opinion on the matter is wrong but I am saying that you should not call people "fucking idiots" because they disagree with the matter. Also, i dont feel that it is "quite wrong" for people who have never made a flash to critize, because as the author of the flash you need to make sure that the people who will be viewing the flash will enjoy it. As i have stated before I have never made a flash, but i do know how hard it is to make one. I appreciate the flashes that people submit, with the exception of the ones that have no point to them at all. If it does not come off as a success, then you just have to go back to the drawing boards and learn from the mistakes, and learn from how people reacted to it. Not complain about it. I hope this is concidered a "sincere review" and i hope that it has enough "critic" for you as well, as well as i hope this will be useful to the artist as well as other reviewers.
P.S. The flash itself was good, the graphics were good as well, however, if there was supposed to be text or a picture in the part where the rules were being stated, it did not show up. This may be a bug in either the computer or the animation, I hope you look into it.
IT'S :D FOLKS
Love The Concept
Love Clocks
Love the Star Syndicate [seen you on the forums]
Love this Flash.
Fucking Five.
Try harder.lol, kidding (see I got ur attention)
It was a good idea, but some of those flashes, for example "First Sentence" which was a flash that was only a sentence:It took me less time to make this flash then you to read this. Those kind of thing can be deleted. Also, just beacuse a user doesn't have a flash submmited into NG, dosn't mean that the person dosen't have a valid opion. What part of you flash deplics is that anyone who has no flashes in the vault, doesn't have the right to vote on things that should be blammed.
Also I think this is the BEST flash from the group,although the group has done thing to adviod help and suggstions by simply calling the reviewr a vulger name...
Overall, The flash has a good point, but if it wasn't a clock move(beacuse of the reputaion they have, some just auto vote them, unfair...) it might have been better by useing a diffrent person to narrate the title.
One mistake...
the music messed up when I played it over,it just went mute but the audio was fine,plz fix that then,it will be a great flash
Let me raise this point, sir:
As to whether or not a person has 'submitted' a flash before,
1) If their submission is blammed, then it will not show that they have submitted anything
2) Perhaps they ARE working on something, and don't wish to turn in unfinished work
3) Does a person need to have read a book, seen a movie, or heard a song to know whether or not they liked it? Do I NEED to know how they made the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park (just to make the reference slightly obscure) work in order to get the movie? I'd argue that they didn't. In fact, I'd argue that the mystery of it makes things more interesting.
If you are going to look in my profile as to whether or not I've submitted anything, you will, as you have probably guessed found it empty. The reason being a combination of my first two points; I've both submitted an absolutely horrible flash, which was not necessarily unintentional, and I've been working on better pieces from time to time (I'm more into video than animating, however).
All in all, I respect your work as an artist, and this review is merely to critique your point, not yourself.