At 8/13/09 06:30 PM, michelinman wrote:
NASCAR was exciting for DECADES without the chase system, and I think they really tainted a lot of history by instating it. What do you guys think?
The main issue I had was that Kenseth ran away with the title by being consistent, as opposed to winning lots of races. I think that while NASCAR made a pretty poor decision to install a playoff for the final 10 races to the end of the season.
I think that the main solution to the issue would be to place more emphasis on wins - more points in the championship - an extra 20-25 points for the winner would serve to push drivers like Mark Martin up the rankings, as they have had quite a consistant season, but 4 wins would be an extra 100 points, pushing him up 4 spots. Of course, this would only mean that Tony Stewart and Jimmie Johnson have realistic chances of winning the championship.
Also, how about some bonus points for pole positions? It's something of a specialist subject for Brian Vickers at present, but has been the stomping ground of Ryan Newman at one point. I'd suggest 5 points for the pole winner (none if qualifying is rained out)
At 8/14/09 03:31 AM, Gooch wrote:
All I know is that I'm confident Lance McGrew can get the team turned around for next season.
Giving him this season to get used to working with the personnel and the equipment will pay dividends for next year. When the program comes around for 2010, I am confident that Dale Jr. will be able to emerge from the ashes of the 2009 season and build a successful run.