At 12/3/06 04:25 AM, Mogly wrote:
Why can't it just be more controlled rather than locking it. This place has got worse no doubt, but I think that's a bit drastic.
Yeah, and locking it would just mean that all the spam would diffuse out evenly across the forum like before :P
Random spam is fun and all, but we do need to keep it under control. New rule: In-jokes and responses which don't add to the thread as a whole are allowed so long as they're included as a small part of a post which is actually on topic. How does that sound?
Anyway, in response to what's been said on some previous pages:
At 12/2/06 09:48 AM, Luis wrote:
If you are directing your inquiry towards just one person please do not use this thread for it. Theres a wonderful thing by liljim called Private Messaging, it can do lots of cool things like send messages to particular users, it has a huge inbox and everything. Try it!
I will be heavily deleting posts that violate that so please be warned.
I do think that kinda defeats the purpose of a forum. I mean, practically every reply in a help thread is directed primarily at the topic starter, so does that mean that all such threads should have no replies? If it's something which concerns one person and only one person, then fine, PMing is the way to go, but lots of inquiries directed towards individuals either are or have responses which are of interest to a lot of people.
At 12/2/06 01:28 PM, DFox wrote:
If the Newgrounds voting system was a real democracy, it would make it MUCH more accurate and fair. Each person should be able to vote on each Flash ONCE, and their vote should count as ONE.
There're two flaws with this, though.
First, an every vote counts system would mean that people's scores would be much more greatly affected by people who get either alts or friends to vote on their stuff. How many people do you know that would spend a year and a half levelling up ten alts to get their voting powers up by 6x, just to get their new submissions through?
Secondly, and more seriously, it would effectively render useless the amount of time spent voting to raise voting power. When users signed up, high voters years an years ago, they were led to believe that continuous and consistent voting would reward them with high voting powers. To take them away at a stage like this would just demmand compensation.
Also, you have the fact that the voting system isn't that bad. Sure, lots of submissions get higher or lower scores than they deserce, sometimes disproportionately so <cough>IllWillPress</cough> but in general, good submissions get green scores; great ones get blue scores and godlike ones get into the fours.
If there was a change I would like to see made, it would be for Wade or someone to get a lot more strict about people voting ones or zeros on high scoring submissions. Lots of people would protest that you vote sero on things if ou want their scores to be loweres, but fuck them; the purpose of a six - score voting panel is to give the score closest to what you thing something deserves, not so you can try to play God and damage something's score as much as possible.
And in response to the talk about locking this thread; the spam needs to be cut down drastically; no question. And it is annoying when good, on topic posts just get swept under the carpet. But locking the thread isn't going to do it any good; it'd be a lot more productive to repeatedly make sure people were aware of the amount of smam-less-ness their posts need here (I didn't even get a chance to see that jimbot post a few pages back), maybe even issuing short term bans in extreme cases, untill people just got a grip. It'd be more rewarding in the long term.