At 11/13/14 06:49 AM, Aprime wrote: What do you say when people say "Flash is dying" in order to defend Flash?
I guess one key point is that it would work on the old computers and HTML5 won't :P
The computer doesn't have much to do with it, it depends what browser that computer is running.
I don't really get into discussions about it, though. I think this point came up like a page or two ago: if I write something for the Flash platform, it's pretty much guaranteed to work across all configurations, while with HTML5 (more often than not) will give me trouble.
It's an advantage and disadvantage. One codebase and company developing the Flash player ensures cross-platform is made easier for us as developers, but means they have total control over how the technology progresses; right now that looks pretty bleak. HTML interpretations vary between browsers (special CSS tags, rendering issues, whatever), which is evident whether you're building a game or a website so developers have to write more code to get a consistent experience for their users.
I think the whole "Flash is dying" thing is a little exaggerated. There's no doubt in my mind that usage/popularity is dropping, but it doesn't seem to be at the rate people were expecting after Jobs publicly expressed his hate towards it.
I honestly believe that if Adobe look at what communities like this have to say, they could benefit massively. Unfortunately I can't see that ever happening.
we'll all just be using Haxe to publish to web when Flash is dead because we can't let go of the past and AS3 ;)