HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
Who fina-fucking-lly switched to AS3? I fina-fucking-lly switch to AS3. For now I'm using Eclipse SDK and Flex Builder, and they work great, but FB runs out after 60 days. I could've sworn it was free, unless there's a difference between Flex and Flex Builder. Anyway, if I run out of the trial, I'll get the free one if it's there. Do any of you know?
MY E-PENIS IS BIGGER THAN YOURS
8=================================>
...and this is my fag...
At 11/27/08 11:05 AM, El-Presidente wrote: Who fina-fucking-lly switched to AS3? I fina-fucking-lly switch to AS3. For now I'm using Eclipse SDK and Flex Builder, and they work great, but FB runs out after 60 days. I could've sworn it was free, unless there's a difference between Flex and Flex Builder. Anyway, if I run out of the trial, I'll get the free one if it's there. Do any of you know?
Still switching. Slowly. Tablet PC with my working copy of CS3 and all my samples still has PSU issues, so no progress on my Perspy engine (which I should redo in CS4... anyone want to loan me £150?)
Anyway, yes, there's a difference between FB and it's SDK. Flex is just a command line compiler available here, which should be configurable to run in your IDE of choice, whereas FB is a development environment that runs based on Eclipse.
In future, can all responders to people who make "I want to make a game but want free flash maker apps plz" stop recommending LiveSWF and recommend Flex instead? Keep recommending LiveSWF for animation work, naturally, but we may as well break the proto-coders minds early with Pandora's Flex rather than watching them drive themselves insane trying to code in third party tools.
...
Merry Thanksgiving
Because happy doesn't describe it.
At 11/27/08 12:03 PM, KaynSlamdyke wrote: Keep recommending LiveSWF for animation work, naturally,
Pencil. Pencil.
http://www.les-stooges.org/pascal/pencil /
Happy Thanksgiving everybody. I just wanted to let you guys know that I have been releasing my animation process in my thread, The Making of Little Aviator. Hopefully you guys check it out and take something away from it. I update it everyday until I release my short, Little Aviator. Leave comments and let me know what you think. :)
At your service
Thanksgiving to everyone.
I'm thankful for NG and the cool community and the place to show off my stuffs to tons of 13 yr olds.
I'm tired and it's 8pm :(
Dexter is awesome.
Sup, bitches :)
At 11/27/08 11:05 AM, El-Presidente wrote: Who fina-fucking-lly switched to AS3? I fina-fucking-lly switch to AS3. For now I'm using Eclipse SDK and Flex Builder, and they work great, but FB runs out after 60 days. I could've sworn it was free, unless there's a difference between Flex and Flex Builder. Anyway, if I run out of the trial, I'll get the free one if it's there. Do any of you know?
Instead, get the Flex SDK (can be found free on adobe.com) and use FlashDevelop as text editor.
I have time traveled back in time to last week, I will return and reply to this comment then.
the comment was not there last week... i apologize for such a rookie mistake
i havnt posted here for some time, hows everyone getting on?
At 11/27/08 05:29 PM, funkycaveman wrote: i havnt posted here for some time, hows everyone getting on?
Good.
A mini 6 day project to help get my mind around trig.
I used to use FlashDevelop, although there were some glitches that happened with it, and I couldn't fix them, and didn't really feel like re-downloading it all. I guess I'll have to do that when I start something real and want it to keep going and not just have a 60 day trial. I'll do that soon so Nate and I can really get our game started, but this is good for testing things.
MY E-PENIS IS BIGGER THAN YOURS
8=================================>
...and this is my fag...
At 11/27/08 03:38 PM, citricsquid wrote: 01001001 00100000 01000001 01001101 00100000 01000001 00100000 01010000 01001111 01001100 01001001 01000011 01000101 00100000 01001101 01000001 01001110 00100000 01000001 01001110 01000100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01001101 01010101 01010010 01000100 01000101 01010010
God dang it, your post made me realise I was skipping the last word from the binary text box :P The actual conversion works supertastically though.. now to write a program in binary!
00100011 01101001 01101110 01100011 01101100 01110101 01100100 01100101 00100000 00111100 01101001 01101111 01110011 01110100 01110010 01100101 01100001 01101101 00111110 00001101 01110101 01110011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101110 01100001 01101101 01100101 01110011 01110000 01100001 01100011 01100101 00100000 01110011 01110100 01100100 00111011 00001101 01101001 01101110 01110100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101001 01101110 00101000 00101001 01111011 00001101 01100011 01101111 01110101 01110100 00111100 00111100 00100010 01001000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 00100000 01010111 01101111 01110010 01101100 01100100 00100010 00111011 00001101 01110010 01100101 01110100 01110101 01110010 01101110 00100000 00110000 00111011 00001101 01111101 00001101
no more binaryspam I promise/
Sup, bitches :)
At 11/28/08 01:12 AM, liaaaam wrote:
00100011 01101001 01101110 01100011 01101100 01110101 01100100 01100101 00100000 00111100 01101001 01101111 01110011 01110100 01110010 01100101 01100001 01101101 00111110 00001101 01110101 01110011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101110 01100001 01101101 01100101 01110011 01110000 01100001 01100011 01100101 00100000 01110011 01110100 01100100 00111011 00001101 01101001 01101110 01110100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101001 01101110 00101000 00101001 01111011 00001101 01100011 01101111 01110101 01110100 00111100 00111100 00100010 01001000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 00100000 01010111 01101111 01110010 01101100 01100100 00100010 00111011 00001101 01110010 01100101 01110100 01110101 01110010 01101110 00100000 00110000 00111011 00001101 01111101 00001101
no more binaryspam I promise/
. . . dear.. lord...
Now, what i wanna know is did you actually write anything like via "binary translator" or something or what? its funny, but good god.... >__<
At 11/28/08 02:06 AM, Duchednier wrote: Now, what i wanna know is did you actually write anything like via "binary translator" or something or what? its funny, but good god.... >__<
What do you mean? Did I write it using a binary translator, or did I write the words "binary translator", or did I write a binary translator.. lol xD
Sup, bitches :)
I'm Stuck On Newgrounds :/
I can't leave! I need naked pics of tom!
At 11/28/08 03:00 AM, mexifry895 wrote: lol.
You aren't supposed to reveal those things! :O
Some people haven't got to that secret!
But...Theres nothing at the top that says anything about it. When you individually go into each secret it does, but at the top it doesn't.
Only 13 more years till I get those sweet, sweet pictures.
At 11/27/08 04:41 AM, hesselbom wrote: http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/
flashplayer10/flashplayer10_rtmfp_faq_11 1208.pdf :D
For people too lazy to read/understand this it means that flash files will now be able to send data peer to peer with just a connection to a server instead of sending data first to server and then the server sends to other peers. Faster and much cheaper bandwidth-wise!
At 11/28/08 08:44 AM, hesselbom wrote: For people too lazy to read/understand this it means that flash files will now be able to send data peer to peer with just a connection to a server instead of sending data first to server and then the server sends to other peers. Faster and much cheaper bandwidth-wise!
You are such a geek!
At 11/28/08 08:44 AM, hesselbom wrote: For people too lazy to read/understand this it means that flash files will now be able to send data peer to peer with just a connection to a server instead of sending data first to server and then the server sends to other peers. Faster and much cheaper bandwidth-wise!
For people to lazy to tell us what the link actually leads to before linking us to PDFs out of nowhere, I'll explain that no matter how amazing the Flash tech gets, the interest it generates will be overshadowed by talk of eating turkey.
...
At 11/28/08 08:54 AM, KaynSlamdyke wrote: For people to lazy to tell us what the link actually leads to before linking us to PDFs out of nowhere
What? It's from macromedia.com and PDFs are always important. I even put a really happy smiley face after the link.
At 11/28/08 02:37 AM, liaaaam wrote:At 11/28/08 02:06 AM, Duchednier wrote: Now, what i wanna know is did you actually write anything like via "binary translator" or something or what? its funny, but good god.... >__<What do you mean? Did I write it using a binary translator, or did I write the words "binary translator", or did I write a binary translator.. lol xD
I meand did you find a binary translator, write something and translate it, or did you just make up numbers?
At 11/28/08 10:47 AM, Duchednier wrote: I meand did you find a binary translator, write something and translate it, or did you just make up numbers?
It's a link to a binary translator Liam made. Paste the text and press the button.
I don't see how it's fun. Ten lines of code, awesome.
Oh Geez
Either I am a terrible animator, or the portal doesn't accurately reflect quality (or both)
I just hope its not the first one, cause I feel like shit.
At 11/28/08 11:29 AM, ChillyCheese wrote: Oh Geez
Either I am a terrible animator, or the portal doesn't accurately reflect quality (or both)
I just hope its not the first one, cause I feel like shit.
Your animation was great.
It is just noobs that vote 0 for no reason OR jealousy of your work. I know that i vote 5 on that flash because it was well animated.
I really enjoyed ChillyCheese. I think it should be higher than it is, but you know how the voters are nowadays. Also, for a fourteen year old, you are really good at animation man. 4 years from now you'll be animating Disney movies in a day lol
At your service
At 11/28/08 10:57 AM, GustTheASGuy wrote: It's a link to a binary translator Liam made. Paste the text and press the button.
I don't see how it's fun. Ten lines of code, awesome.
Well to convert binary to text it's 7 lines (5 if it wasn't a function), though I wrote 2 functions for that.. 1 to convert it and one to separate the binary into an array. Text to binary is simpler of course because I don't need to isolate each letter, so 10 lines (8 if it wasn't a function).
function binconv(bin:String):String {
var num:Number = Number(bin.charAt(bin.length-1));
for (var a:Number = bin.length-1; a>0; a--) {
num += Number(bin.charAt(a-1)) << ((bin.length)-a);
}
return String.fromCharCode(num);
}
function char2bin(str:String):String {
var ret:String = "";
for (var a:Number = 0; a<str.length; a++) {
var cur:String = str.charCodeAt(a).toString(2);
while (cur.length != 8) {
cur = "0"+cur;
}
ret += cur+" ";
}
return ret;
}
function bin2char(bin:String):String {
var ret:String = "";
var bins:Array = [""];
var bincount:Number = 0;
for (var a:Number = 0; a<bin.length; a++) {
if (bin.charAt(a) == " ") {
bincount++;
bins.push("");
} else {
bins[bincount] += bin.charAt(a);
}
}
for (var b:Number = 0; b<bincount+1; b++) {
ret += binconv(bins[b]);
}
return ret;
}
I used AS2 because I've only got Flash 8 installed on Windows, Flex is on Linux.
That's the first thing I've done in actionscript in a long time and it has made me realise even more so how much I like C++ >_< It would be longer to do in C++ but it would be so much better. Declaring a simple number in AS2 is
var my_num:Number = 0;
Whereas in C++..
int my_num = 0;
And of course you have much more control, I'm not forced to use doubles when all I want to do is loop from 0-1000 :p
Sup, bitches :)
Thanks, I guess theres nothing more to do than start something else then, eh?
