I wasn't arguing for or against anything. I just wanted to clear up a (very common) misunderstanding.
At 3/20/24 10:01 AM, SmurfCatIsGay wrote:Stolen:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922542
Original:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFf4FmmTBXo
Not stolen, the Linktree for the YouTube account that made the thing links back to the Newgrounds account that uploaded the "stolen" submission.
I'm happy it got dealt with, but the conversation was more about whether or not images from free-to-use image sites constitute as stolen assets or not.
And given that Newgrounds itself allows users to publish art under a Creative Commons license in the Art portal, I think it's a healthy conversation to have!
At 3/20/24 11:50 AM, CarterSterling wrote:I'm happy it got dealt with, but the conversation was more about whether or not images from free-to-use image sites constitute as stolen assets or not.
And given that Newgrounds itself allows users to publish art under a Creative Commons license in the Art portal, I think it's a healthy conversation to have!
Its definitely good this whole issue got hashed out - makes it clear where the line is regarding asset use.
He just doesn't know when to quit. Reuploading blammed content.
Originals:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/918306
At 3/20/24 03:31 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922575
He just doesn't know when to quit. Reuploading blammed content.
Originals:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/918306
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/918429
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/920388
Its times like these which make me wonder how you'd automate detecting such reuploads.
At 3/20/24 03:34 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 3/20/24 03:31 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922575Its times like these which make me wonder how you'd automate detecting such reuploads.
He just doesn't know when to quit. Reuploading blammed content.
Originals:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/918306
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/918429
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/920388
It's quite easy when they don't wait for a long period of time before reuploading. If they had waited like a month before doing it the first time, I would not have remember this and ignore it. But after 4 reuploads within a little over a month, it's a lot more obvious and way easier to remember.
<EXPLICIT> https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922611
Reupload of removed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922511
At 3/21/24 12:02 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922688
No animation
v0ted
No animation - edit of Crisis Core cutscene
<EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922736
No animation - still image
this 14-year-old portal
it won't work when you hit the Bloody play button
the fact it is still alive AND HAVES RUFFLE
At 3/21/24 09:58 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/547228
this 14-year-old portal
it won't work when you hit the Bloody play button
the fact it is still alive AND HAVES RUFFLE
This is from 2010. Stop wasting our time with these ridiculous posts.
Didnt somebody report a 2016 movie that didn't have the video file??? around Jan or something
At 3/21/24 10:16 PM, guthrie wrote:At 3/21/24 09:58 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/547228
this 14-year-old portal
it won't work when you hit the Bloody play button
the fact it is still alive AND HAVES RUFFLE
This is from 2010. Stop wasting our time with these ridiculous posts.
At 3/21/24 09:58 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/547228
this 14-year-old portal
it won't work when you hit the Bloody play button
the fact it is still alive AND HAVES RUFFLE
Wrong thread. You’re probably looking for the Ruffle Testing thread
umm, this has ruffle???? why would i add ruffle to that
At 3/21/24 10:18 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 3/21/24 09:58 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/547228
this 14-year-old portal
it won't work when you hit the Bloody play button
the fact it is still alive AND HAVES RUFFLE
Wrong thread. You’re probably looking for the Ruffle Testing thread
At 3/21/24 10:20 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:umm, this has ruffle???? why would i add ruffle to that
He's saying to post this to the ruffle thread so that it can be looked at as a bug with ruffle, which it is.
Ruffle doesn't work with every flash yet, and taking down or flagging every old flash where there are problems with Ruffle is doing the exact opposite of what it was meant for.
ohhhh ok i get it now im not a longtime NG User like all of you
i don't know looks like the play button never worked before and after ruffle according to the reviews
I will give it a shot
At 3/21/24 10:24 PM, CarterSterling wrote:At 3/21/24 10:20 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:umm, this has ruffle???? why would i add ruffle to that
He's saying to post this to the ruffle thread so that it can be looked at as a bug with ruffle, which it is.
Ruffle doesn't work with every flash yet, and taking down or flagging every old flash where there are problems with Ruffle is doing the exact opposite of what it was meant for.
At 3/21/24 10:25 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:ohhhh ok i get it now im not a longtime NG User like all of you
i don't know looks like the play button never worked before and after the ruffle according to the reviews
I will give it a shot
No worries! Honestly, looking at the reviews now it looks like it was a stolen flash - which definitely is flaggable, however I find it's much harder to get older submissions removed. It definitely is possible that the play button never really worked, and it's good on you for both catching that and finding old submissions like this.
However, the Elite Guard Barracks are usually meant to keep specifically the portal clean - I don't think most people here are looking to flag a post from 2010 because it doesn't work anymore.
Also, no worries for not understanding what people were trying to say at first - happens to the best of us, and I'm happy I could clear it up a bit!
oh for fuck
nah, that OLD submission has a little bit of a darker thing going on in the code
At 3/21/24 10:43 PM, tox wrote:oh for fuck
nah, that OLD submission has a little bit of a darker thing going on in the code
What, you dont like learning about the importance of evenly rotating a doner meat?
Audio / Forum / Games & Movies Moderator. Flag stolen content, don't be a dingus.
At 3/21/24 10:52 PM, Pingu wrote:At 3/21/24 10:43 PM, tox wrote:oh for fuck
nah, that OLD submission has a little bit of a darker thing going on in the code
What, you dont like learning about the importance of evenly rotating a doner meat?
lol
Pingu, don't be a dinkus
it a gameplay and i don't know the name of the game
At 3/22/24 03:57 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/922830
it a gameplay and i don't know the name of the game
Found the game - it was 1v1.lol. At first I thought it was some Roblox experience, but then I realised the thumbnail had the game's fucking name plastered on it.
Anyways, found some more:
