At 4/23/09 06:53 PM, Ismael92 wrote: Haha, I've had things like that before.

Same. Except mine was 5 open ended questions, each one being insanely hard, except for #5, where it says something like "this is just a joke"

In the instructions, it says to read every question, but of course, no one except for 1 or 2 people did.

But yeah, people never read instructions or rules, if they did it would be much easier for everyone :/

Personally, I don't think a test is a good way to gauge that. On 99% of tests, the instructions are the same, and same with the Terms and Agreements on most websites. But, for say, a sport I've never played, or when I'm filling out paper work for something, I'll read the directions.

Also, READ MEH STOAREH, please. And remember to leave a comment

At 4/23/09 08:24 PM, TheThing wrote: Also, READ MEH STOAREH, please. And remember to leave a comment

Don't worry, I will read it when I get some free time. I'm not busy right now, but if I start reading it I won't be able to finish it. Probably I'll read it on the weekend, and I'll leave a comment so you know I was there.

Here it is again, guys.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

Thought you show know, I'm having bit of a e-fight with someone who couldn't let it go.

Guess using facts pissed him off.

At 4/23/09 11:14 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Thought you show know, I'm having bit of a e-fight with someone who couldn't let it go.

Guess using facts pissed him off.

ah, youtube, like general, except people don't admit that they were wrong when proof stares them in the face.

At 4/23/09 11:49 PM, TheSongSalad wrote:

At 4/23/09 11:14 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Thought you show know, I'm having bit of a e-fight with someone who couldn't let it go.

Guess using facts pissed him off.

ah, youtube, like general, except people don't admit that they were wrong when proof stares them in the face.

Not only that, I got those statisitcs from www.profootball-reference.com

Having over 40 sacks is something I wouldn't call "no pass-rushing"

At 4/24/09 12:00 AM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Not only that, I got those statisitcs from www.profootball-reference.com

Having over 40 sacks is something I wouldn't call "no pass-rushing"

not really. but the 07 patriots is a touchy topic for a lot of people. patriots fans or otherwise.

At 4/24/09 12:03 AM, TheSongSalad wrote:

At 4/24/09 12:00 AM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Not only that, I got those statisitcs from www.profootball-reference.com

Having over 40 sacks is something I wouldn't call "no pass-rushing"

not really. but the 07 patriots is a touchy topic for a lot of people. patriots fans or otherwise.

I have also written couple of song parodies on www.amiright.com regarding that as well, they both received tons of anon. 1-bombings

On the comments it generally receives good feedback so you know they're not bad, some people needs to calm down although the one-bomber is likely one guy cleaning out the cookies so he can vote again.

Okay, this is the second time this game has been ripped off.

• 

  nub made games #1:Defence

  by newt118

  This game is pretty much the programmer's first steps posted for fun!

  Game

  4,795 Views

  (Everyone)

I can't find it though. Anyone know?

this guy re-submitted his own flash:

• 

  Shinland

  by bennywong3011

  2d Adventure type quest. Main character arrives at a town to do quests and stuff

  Game

  13,158 Views

  (Ages 13+)

original:

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

Thank you SlashFirestorm I have looked on the forum and see the red writing kinda odd having mod like powers. I linked to the EGB reviews forums and have added some this morning. I will add to the list when more come in as for the review mod one I would maybe like to try that. Anyway congrats again to the others. I have looked at that link and will keep an eye out.

At 4/24/09 12:03 AM, TheSongSalad wrote:

At 4/24/09 12:00 AM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Not only that, I got those statisitcs from www.profootball-reference.com

Having over 40 sacks is something I wouldn't call "no pass-rushing"

not really. but the 07 patriots is a touchy topic for a lot of people. patriots fans or otherwise.

Here's the latest:

garyb12001 (3 hours ago) Much like the 2006 AFCCG, the D couldn't come up with a stop when it needed most. They gave up 2 TDs in the 4th quarter of that Super Bowl to lose it. It's easy to rack up sacks when you're up 30+ points by halftime of most games because your offense spots you huge leads, putting your opponents in the position of having to pass the ball early and often. The 2007 Pats' D was not the strength of that team, bottom line and you're delusional if you think it was.

At 4/22/09 03:59 PM, SlashFirestorm wrote:

5. NGDD Liaison
While we have NGDD members in our ranks, we've never really had a lot of cross-contact between our two groups. Volunteers for this position would have to be active in both groups and encourage cross-membership and collaboration (such as sharing suspected whistle-worthy stuff in both threads). If you feel up for this, speak up and be heard.

Slash, you might not want to rush to get someone to take this position as i really doubt someone is actually going to take it. The NGDD is going through some reconstruction yet that doesn't mean someone can't take the position. But considering no one has taken this position and it's been open for applications for days now i really doubt anyone is going to take the position.

At 4/24/09 05:44 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: The 2007 Pats' D was not the strength of that team, bottom line and you're delusional if you think it was.

I kind of agree with him. I'm not saying that the Pats had no defense, but it really did rely on the massive offensive production. The guy is right in saying that you play a different offense when you're down by 3 touchdowns, and that makes it easier for the defense to defend, since they know what the other team is going to do 90% of the time.

The Pats defense was (and still is) old and slow. They're smart and can play, but they just didn't and don't have much gas left in the tank. It was clear in their last Superbowl, when the Giants offense ran circles around them in the last few minutes of the game.

Hey guys, guess who managed to steal Daily 4th using multiple alts?

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

At least this might piss Wade off enough to go on another deletion spree. Either way, best to be more vigilant regarding his submissions.

At 4/25/09 02:25 AM, TheThing wrote:

At 4/24/09 05:44 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: The 2007 Pats' D was not the strength of that team, bottom line and you're delusional if you think it was.

I kind of agree with him. I'm not saying that the Pats had no defense, but it really did rely on the massive offensive production. The guy is right in saying that you play a different offense when you're down by 3 touchdowns, and that makes it easier for the defense to defend, since they know what the other team is going to do 90% of the time.

So you also think I'm delusional?

In times like this you still have to defend, if not your in trouble and remember the Patriots put up a defensive battle in that game, what did them in is how the Giants made a swiss cheese out of their O-Line. If their defense was bad then we'd win by several touchdowns.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

Stolen from nothing other than the Pico Day preloader

At 4/25/09 12:58 PM, Coop83 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/49 2967
Stolen from nothing other than the Pico Day preloader

Now, that's what I call being stupid. "Grafitti art I made for pico day! I know I'm a tad early :-(" ? Who the would believe that? Even if you right click and play you'll see the other frames from the preloader like "paste the movie clip..."

LOL

At 4/25/09 12:01 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: In times like this you still have to defend, if not your in trouble and remember the Patriots put up a defensive battle in that game, what did them in is how the Giants made a swiss cheese out of their O-Line. If their defense was bad then we'd win by several touchdowns.

Way to not quote all of what I said. You forgot to include this paragraph.

The Pats defense was (and still is) old and slow. They're smart and can play, but they just didn't and don't have much gas left in the tank. It was clear in their last Superbowl, when the Giants offense ran circles around them in the last few minutes of the game.

I know it was a defensive battle, and I know that they can play. But they're old, slow and just don't have the endurance anymore to play a knock-down, grind--out game. It was extra evident in the Super Bowl, since they really didn't have too many of those kinds of games that year, and the Giants have one of the toughest defensives in the league.

At 4/25/09 08:52 PM, TheThing wrote: and the Giants have one of the toughest defensives in the league.

Do you think I'm taking the credits from the Giants?

Thank you RohantheBarbarian for linking that stolen flash I Pm Tom Fulp. I cannot understand how I missed it yesterday but stealing TOTW or Underdog, but Daily Forth Place is so low. Anyway I linked it to the forum. I noticed that we now have a new BBS mod welcome Transformer. http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1053 112 Yep its odd how me got modded but Wade Fulp modded him from the thread lucky thing. Luis was unmodded but now is modded again confusing. Some thought Transformer was another mod alt but I don't know. He is now the only mod I know who is level 1 Luis is level 2.

At 4/25/09 09:47 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote:

At 4/25/09 08:52 PM, TheThing wrote: and the Giants have one of the toughest defensives in the league.

Do you think I'm taking the credits from the Giants?

No, I'm just saying that the Giants have a much better defense, and they have the ability to keep hitting you hard and chase after you all game, unlike the Pats. The Patriots' defense was just too tired by the end of the Super Bowl to be very effective. They were able to match the intensity of the Giants defense for a little bit, but couldn't sustain it.

If the Patriots' defense was about 5-10 years younger, they'd be great. But they just don't have the speed or endurance to play well, and therefore have to rely on the offense to win games.

At 4/25/09 10:59 PM, TheThing wrote:

At 4/25/09 09:47 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote:

At 4/25/09 08:52 PM, TheThing wrote: and the Giants have one of the toughest defensives in the league.

Do you think I'm taking the credits from the Giants?

No, I'm just saying that the Giants have a much better defense, and they have the ability to keep hitting you hard and chase after you all game, unlike the Pats. The Patriots' defense was just too tired by the end of the Super Bowl to be very effective. They were able to match the intensity of the Giants defense for a little bit, but couldn't sustain it.

Keep in mind the reason why i got into an e-fight with that guy is that his post indicate taking credit from the Giants.

Haven't post a reply for some time, probably gave up.

On one of his early posts, he whined about a holding.

Ahhh! I spotted one DURING THE DAYTIME!!

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

Transformer becoming a mod isn't so much of a shock to me. He spends a lot of time in the Paltalk room and most mods that are modded are users which spent time in the paltalk room.

Yes I noticed that too he had his account deleted in the obituaries you can see all his deleted flashes. I don't know why he got deleted must have been maybe stealing awards any idea? Transformer was in the chat rooms I thought maybe prior to that post that maybe he had already some idea he may have been modded. So I guess it helped him the level 1 gold aura looks kinda cool do you think?GenderlessHooker new account I wonder how long that will last?

What do you mean new account? I remember the alt I saw that popped up last month, and the main one, GenderlessHooker...

Back again.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

It's probably just Wade being silly and modding an admin/mod's alt to dick around. Nothing to be concerned about.

In EGB news, the position of NGDD Liaison will be put on hold until the DoD is restructured and everything's settled. Members of the DoD are encouraged to keep us apprised of how things are going, and encouraged to apply for the liaison position once it'd be useful.

In other Newgrounds news, I am itching for the damn lit portal and really hope it comes out soon. My incentive to write would be a lot greater if I knew my Newgrounds buddies could read my stories more easily...

At 4/26/09 10:56 PM, KrevZabijak wrote: What do you mean new account? I remember the alt I saw that popped up last month, and the main one, GenderlessHooker...

Oh right did not know he had an alt last month. When I asked why he got his account deleted? he said he had no idea why but I don't really believe he does not have any idea. Only saw loads of his deleted stuff in yesterday obituaries http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/49 2989. Just one of the many. Welcome back Lizzardis. I like the idea of the Lit Portal its about stories and writing right? I tend to lurk but like the idea. Hopefully it wont be like Newgrounds Chat.