At 11/25/12 10:19 AM, ElGhoulio wrote: Yeah, I mean the very title of the review contradicts the score. If it's "flawed", then it by definition can't be 100, since 100 means "flawless". Some people don't understand that well. 100 is supposed to be "flawless" and without a SINGLE complaint AT ALL, and NO room for improvement.
At the very end of the review he explains he would have given the album something like 75% but gave it 100% for the uniqueness and feeling of the album. I get the point, but it still feels kind of weird to me because of the various flaws he points out through the review.
If it makes you feel better, that review is old, and they've gotten quite stricter in the last 4 or so years. That review probably wouldn't get accepted today.
The review is good though, and I most say that I like seing someone give a positive review for St. Anger, especially the way this one dude did it. Just the score bothers me. A 90-95% would have been more appropriate.
Bogdan Raczynski -- Bog's Basil & Curry Powder Pot
I have two plays for this guy on last.fm :)