At 9/25/11 11:30 AM, TheSporkLord wrote:
Even though we've all listened to bigger and better bands I don't think that means we should just abandon metallica. I still enjoy listening to some old school metallica once in a while.
Not that I meant we should give up on them, but most metalheads, and that doesn't exclude this place, have pretty much abandonned hope to see a new good Metallica album. Most metalheads stopped liking their stuff somewhere around the release of the black album. Still, every time they release something, we rant on how shitty it is. I guess that's just normal, they are one of the big four and they have heavily influenced metal and music in general. Same goes for all the big names who release shitty stuff. No matter how many shitty albums they release, we still get pissed just as much when they throw another turd at us.
At 9/25/11 11:59 AM, Zodir wrote:
Death Magnetic suprised me by how little it sucked. So I was expecting you know, more of the not sucking. And Master of Puppets is one of my favorite albums ever along with Justice. I was hoping that they could use DM to continue onto a path of more quality albums, like Megadeth did with The System Has Failed.
From the point of view of someone who liked Death Magnetic, I can really see why you would say that. Good point. And it's true that Death Magnetic, while it didn't leave a lasting impression on me, was not a bad release.
At 9/25/11 12:58 PM, Zodir wrote:
I actually enjoyed DM. I said surprised me with a lack of suck. While yes, it is not nearly the quality of Metallica's peak albums, it was very enjoyable. The Day that Never Comes and All Nightmare Long are solid quality tracks, well worth a fna's time. I was expecting a step up in quality, not the step down that this album is looking to be.
So you guys all think that this album with Lou Reed is going to be a big shit in his entirety?
At 9/25/11 01:38 PM, Haggard wrote:
You can never be "done" with Metallica, man. :P
I know what you mean. Hate them... love them... they are one of the big bands of Metal. No matter what's your favorite metal subgenre, you always end up disussing the newest Metallica stuff :P
It's my favorite band and it will ever be (it's the band that brought me into metal). I'm also one of the few that liked St. Anger (yes, the sound is shit, but if you are able to listen beyond that you get some very heavy stuff and some AWESOMELY energetic songs). Death Magnetic was a step in the right direction, even though the sound still is shitty.
I didn't hate St.Anger either. The song-writting isn't exactly bad, but I think that's not what Thrash Metal fans expect from Metallica. Not a great album by any means, though.
At 9/25/11 03:20 PM, hitman1993 wrote:
So many people that call themselves Metallica fans hate a lot of their newer stuff. Either they hate everything past the 80's, or everything past the 90's, or whatever, I only know a few people who genuinely enjoy every Metallica album. I do. You can't expect Metallica to sound the same every single album, a band has to evolve as time goes on!
I think that's not the point...
The point is that St.Anger was a rare brand of weird down-watered thrash metal, mixed with some industrial hard rock stuff... and even some nu-metal riffs and structures. I have nothing against exploration, but going as far as changing your genre completely is not what I call a "refreshing evolution".
A big thing I see is that people are only comparing their newer albums to their older albums, and not looking at it as an album in itself. Take St. Anger for example. If you compare it to earlier Metallica, it sucks ass, it's their worst album. If you ignore everything they've ever done, and pretend it's the debut album from a new band, it's pretty good in my opinion.
Yeah, that's true. That's what people do. But I don't see how this is a bad approach. Yes, you do have to take the album as a unique piece of art and take it for what it is. But with such big as Metallica, it's kind of hard to ask your fans to swallow the pill, no matter what. As they developped a fanbase, they also helped the fans create an ideal of what Metallica should sound like.
You see? You can't expect a band to always be the same album after album! Death Magnetic is a fantastic album, it's some of the heaviest stuff they did in a while! I will always be true to the horsemen... and Rob Trujillo. Also, you can not truly judge Lulu by 90 seconds of one song. When they release "The View" in it's entirety tomorrow, you can have a little more room for judgment, but even then it's still just one song. I'm not judging this album until the full release.
And you can't really blame the fans of disliking anything and everything that doesn't sound the same as the other albums, cause even there, you make the mistake of thinking that the first four albums all sounded the same, and this is not true. All of these albums was unique. So in fact, Metallica fans are not just a bunch of stupid kids who can't accept that the band is evolving (while some morons do worship all they wrote back in the 80's just because... THEY WROTE IT IN THE 80'S and... IT'S COOL TO DISS THE NEW STUFF). The band did evolve from one album to another back in the 80's, but a lot of their fans didn't like where they moved on afterward.