At 5/27/05 11:14 PM, sliggdogg wrote:
At 5/27/05 09:48 PM, The_Ghoul wrote:
Alright, if the flame war between Jackofshadows and Sliggdog hasn't ended already, let's edn it. And to correct Jackofshadows, all of what you guys are arguing about is bullshit, since there were more aggressive bands than Metallica in 1984 (Slayer, Venom, Bathory, Hellhammer, Kreator, Sodom, anyone?) and the whole thing about Metallica being anything but a very softened form of thrash metal is bunk. And btw, I find it humourous that you two argue about very trivial things.
rofl.. this post is so wrong it's hilarious.
k
First off, there is no argument between me and JackOfShadows whatsoever.
Then what do you call what you were doing?
Second, there is no argument about Metallica, I've simply already said what you said in this post and everyone so far agrees.
I believe somebody said "Metallica added aggression into early 80's metal" or something like that
Third, we are not arguing about trivial things
Arguing about a list is pretty trivial
, because we are not arguing.
Then what were you doing? It seemed like arguing.
Basically.. I've already said exactly what you've said in this post, so you're disagreeing while saying the exact same things..
No. Some lame shmuck said Metallica were actually worth something to the metal scene. I basically said they were shit, Mustaine was shit, and Megadeth was shit. You guys give Mustaine way too much credit. He's a asshole and a talentless hack, and so are the rest of the dudes who were ever in Alcoholica.
Please read. Reading = Good.
I did. Thanks for the encouragement, though. We sure don't want stupid fucks in the internet, because the internet is very serious business. Good day!