At 12/10/07 10:34 PM, ShitOnAStick wrote:
It was on topic, I gave my opinion, people respond back with theirs, discussion popped up. I didnt run in here lecturing, i just put my opinions on forth. I'm sorry I post stuff you don't have to read in the least bit. If you think what write is stupid or BS, thats fine, but you wasting yourself to reading it, wasnt MY choice. if it makes you feel better, prolly wont be around again for a long while, so i'll take my dr ruth shit with me. That sound good?
Ok, let me tell you something about myself. DO NOT take me seriously. I was making an attempt at a joke because relationships are not something that comes up frequently (unless you care to dispute that, but as long as I've been here its only been occasional at best), and I wanted to ease it down a bit. I don't care what you write, I don't judge. I'm serious, if they get something out of it, all the better It may have been a snide remark, so I'm sorry if I offended, but it wasn't meant that way. You don't have to justify or explain anything to me - your right to post is as inherent as mine. And I wouldn't want you to stop posting.
No. We ran out of a lot of things to say about metal as a vague thread to begin with.
Not necessarily true. Metal changes over time, the bands change, the fans change. As long as the music is there, there is something musically related to talk about. However, and this is a big however, I don't want to discourage other conversation. It's not my job to mod. I still think and though the picspam was getting out of hand though.
Thats retarded. unless the band is God sent, id never pay anything remotely that much to see anybody, ever. Shit..even god sent.
Not to the person that bought them. I think they likely have a strong sentimental connection to the music and band, so money wasn't the issue. I pulled the BBC article, it was over 82 or 83,000 pounds. It was for charity as well. Money isn't too much of an object for me when it comes to my favorite music either. Just one of those things...
