At 4/8/07 01:13 AM, Canas wrote:

At 4/7/07 11:28 PM, Twerpo wrote: FUCKING SHIT!, it's over. The Avs aren't going to the playoffs.

God Damnit!

Man you're funny

They did have a chance, a small chance at that but a chance.

The fact that Calgary lost makes it even worse. If they had pulled off a win then they would have had a chance to go to the playoffs, and probably would when you look at Calgary's away stats.

At 4/7/07 11:14 PM, Twerpo wrote:

Does it automatically refresh like Yahoo Box Score?

Sadly not but i don't really care.

Yes the avalanche out and the flames in.

At 4/8/07 01:28 AM, DarkSoldier wrote:

At 4/7/07 11:14 PM, Twerpo wrote:

Does it automatically refresh like Yahoo Box Score?

Sadly not but i don't really care.

Yes the avalanche out and the flames in.

Whoops sorry.

I said "Yes the avalanche out and the flames in." i meant it in replying to your post not meaning i wanted the avalanche out and the flames in.

At 4/8/07 01:30 AM, DarkSoldier wrote:
I said "Yes the avalanche out and the flames in." i meant it in replying to your post not meaning i wanted the avalanche out and the flames in.

I'm not that pissed off anymore to take offense off of something like that. But when I was listening to the broadcast and I they scored the empty netter I had to go beat the shit out of some of my furniture to calm down.

I guess in the end you have to realise that it is just a game.

At 4/7/07 10:15 PM, Twerpo wrote: Avs up 2 to 1 right now. I'm not to worried about them winning, I'm just hoping for Calgary to choke.

Relatively speaking, the Calgary Flames were trying to give it to us on a plate. We just couldn't get by the Preds.

Bring on 2007-08

At 4/7/07 10:21 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: Calgary choke? Bah never. The way edmonton is playing right now i don't see calgary losing tonight.

ROFL

At 4/8/07 12:26 AM, VeryProudofYa wrote:

At 4/7/07 11:28 PM, Twerpo wrote: FUCKING SHIT!, it's over. The Avs aren't going to the playoffs.

God Damnit!

and so begins the avs miss streak

I'll have $10 on that streak ending at 1.

As an Avs fan I'm dissapointed that we didn't make the playoffs. We just gave ourselves too much to do and we couldn't quite make it up. There's always next year.

And the Sabres won the President's Trophy last night - even though the Wings and Sabres both won, putting them at 113 points, if the Sabres lose their 82nd game, they will still take the tie-break on number of wins (53-50)

At 4/8/07 05:01 AM, Coop83 wrote: At 4/7/07 10:21 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: Calgary choke? Bah never. The way edmonton is playing right now i don't see calgary losing tonight.

ROFL

Well at least Edmonton won there last game.

West: Calgary Flames
East: Ottawa Senators (Because they have a crazy looking Roman Hopite dude with a pissed off "mmmmmmmmm" expressions.

so those Canuck NGers in this club. No doubt we watch Hockey Night in Canada, on Saturdays. What are your thoughs on Nasvh Vinder, the East Indian announcer? I like this blue blazer. Those old 60s ones the old HNIC casters used to wear.

Not a member, but I have something to say:

The Leafs are in.

That is all.

NJ tied with the isles 2-2 ! they tied it with 1 second left.

If The isles lose --> toronto makes it into the playoffs

ISLES Won 3-2 in shootout :'(

At 4/8/07 06:07 PM, Noctroler wrote: Not a member, but I have something to say:

The Leafs are in.

That is all.

Eh no there out.

At 4/8/07 04:31 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: Well at least Edmonton won there last game.

In theory, 15 NHL teams will win their last games. Only if all teams play their last games simeltaneously.

The way it could have gone is that Calgary could have beaten Edmonton, thus stopping them from winning their last game and then repeated the feat last night, by stopping the Avs winning their last game.

Congratulations to Joe Sakic on becoming the second oldest player in NHL history to score 100 points in a season. He now has 6 x 100+ points seasons. I'm pretty sure he'll pass 1,600 points and 1,000 assists next year.

No prizes for guessing that the oldest player to score 100+ points was Gordie Howe. Mr. Hockey scored 103 points in 1968-69, when he was 40 years young.

At 4/9/07 08:46 PM, Canas wrote: Also, i've created an AOL Playoff fantasy pool for Newgrounders, if anybody is interested.

I'm already in that league but i don't know how to play?

At 4/9/07 08:46 PM, Canas wrote: Also, i've created an AOL Playoff fantasy pool for Newgrounders, if anybody is interested.

http://fantasysports.aol.com/games/hockey/pla yoff/index.cfm

All you need is your AIM screenname to play, and it's quite different than what we did this season. I'm quite sure different teams can pick the same people.

Unfortunately there is no draft, but if you're itching for some fantasy action, the league id is 13353, and the password is wadefulpsbeard.

I joined, can you view other peoples players? The server is slow as fuck and I don't feel like waiting ten minutes.

If you can't see each other's players, lets just post our rosters here.

At 4/9/07 08:21 PM, Canas wrote: Predictions, gentlemen?

I'll give them one round at a time.

West

(1) Detroit
(8) Calgary -- Calgary

Red Wings

(2) Anaheim -- Anaheim -- Anaheim -- Anaheim
(7) Minnesota

Wild

(3) Vancouver -- Vancouver
(6) Dallas

Stars

(4) Nashville -- Nashville -- Nashville
(5) San Jose

Sharks

East

(1) Buffalo -- Buffalo -- Buffalo -- Buffalo
(8) New York

Sabres

4) Ottawa -- Ottawa
(5) Pittsburgh

Penguins

(2) New Jersey -- New Jersey
(7) Tampa Bay

Devils

(3) Atlanta -- Atlanta -- Atlanta
(6) New York

Rangers

I'll make further predictions when we get further through the postseason.

x1 C J. Arnott, NSH at SJ 0-1 5 3.2 3.2
x1 C C. Drury, BUF at NYI 0-0 0 0.0 0.0
x1 C M. Modano, DAL VAN 0-0 0 2.4 2.4
x1 W T. Amonte, CAL DET 0-0 0 0.0 0.0
x1 W N. Ekman, PIT OTT 1-0 3 0.0 0.0
x1 W J. Cheechoo, SJ NSH 0-1 5 0.0 0.0
x1 D S. Niedermayer, ANA at MIN 1-0 1 2.6 2.6
x1 D M. Norstrom, DAL VAN 0-0 0 1.2 1.2
x1 D C. Chelios, DET at CAL 0-0 0 0.0 0.0
x1 G M. Brodeur, NJ at TB 0-0 0 0.0 0.0

That's my roster.

At 4/12/07 03:01 PM, Twerpo wrote: x1 C J. Arnott, NSH at SJ 0-1 5 3.2 3.2
x1 C C. Drury, BUF at NYI 0-0 0 0.0 0.0
x1 D S. Niedermayer, ANA at MIN 1-0 1 2.6 2.6
x1 G M. Brodeur, NJ at TB 0-0 0 0.0 0.0

There are your good players.

Also, CHEECH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! That kind of messes up my lineup. Speaking of which:

C D. Roy, BUF
C J. Spezza
C J. Thornton, SJ
W T. Vanek, BUF
W M. Gaborik, MIN
W J. Cheechoo, SJ
D T. Poti, NYI BUF
D R. Whitney, PIT
D S. Niedermayer, ANA
G H. Lundqvist, NYR

Isles tonight @ 8! :D

At 4/12/07 05:11 PM, Canas wrote:

At 4/12/07 03:01 PM, Twerpo wrote: x1 C M. Modano, DAL VAN 0-0 0 2.4 2.4
x1 W T. Amonte, CAL DET 0-0 0 0.0 0.0
x1 W N. Ekman, PIT OTT 1-0 3 0.0 0.0
x1 W J. Cheechoo, SJ NSH 0-1 5 0.0 0.0
x1 D M. Norstrom, DAL VAN 0-0 0 1.2 1.2
x1 D C. Chelios, DET at CAL 0-0 0 0.0 0.0

Wtf?

Are you insane? Modano is old, Amonte had around ten goals, Ekman was a phantom on a star-studed team, Cheechoo is injured,

Modano is still good. The others were accidental. I pressed the accept to early.

Norstrom isn't an offensive defenseman, and Chelios hasn't scored in 23 years. You DO know that you can pick anyone, right? No wonder you did terrible in Yahoo this year.

+/-

Is it just me, or does Steve Konowalchuk look like Wade Fulp.

MINE'S A SECRET.

At 4/12/07 09:05 PM, Twerpo wrote: Is it just me, or does Steve Konowalchuk look like Wade Fulp.

Photoshop some sunglasses on him and I'll tell you :P

At 4/12/07 08:02 PM, Twerpo wrote:

x1 W T. Amonte, CAL DET 0-0 0 0.0 0.0
x1 W N. Ekman, PIT OTT 1-0 3 0.0 0.0
x1 D M. Norstrom, DAL VAN 0-0 0 1.2 1.2
x1 D C. Chelios, DET at CAL 0-0 0 0.0 0.0

Modano is still good. The others were accidental. I pressed the accept to early.

How do you accidentally highlight and click accept four times?

Fine. I'm a completely horrible person. I suck terribly at picking fantasy hockey players. I'm a disgrace to fantasy hockey players everywhere.

Happy now?

I'm currently watching the Detroit-Calgary saga right now, and I have to laugh..... no the game play is good, but if you can speak Cantonese then you'd get this joke. Anyways I hear the name Datsyuk alot. Pronounced as (Dat-sook). ah ha ha ha ha ha. Anyways. Dat Sook (or Uncle Dat), is one of the actors that often stars with Steven Chow (Hong Kong Hussle, Shaolin Soccer), He's the Hong Kong Jim Carrey (silly silly type of comedy that's good for only one or a few views).

Anyways, Ng Mun Dat, (Dat Sook), usually plays this typical Asian fat uncle dude (the thick dark mostash) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:God_of_gam blers_II_1.jpg who's clumsy bumblings get himself nearly killed, or often falls victims to the crazy schemes of Steven's characters. I favorite is when Dat Sook is parodying Terminator, and tries to protect a school of kids from some terrorists. only to find out that he runs out of ammo, and has to surrender so he waves his tighty whities.

So when I hear Datsyuk's name pronounced by the sports caster, and since he's a high scorer so therefore I hear it alot. I laugh.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/43 /God_of_gamblers_II_1.jpg

There we go the picture of Dat-sook (aka Datsyck).

At 4/14/07 06:03 PM, hongkongexpress wrote: BLAH BLAH BLAH Datsyuk's pronounced wrong.

So how's it supposed to be pronounced?

Dat-syuk?

RICK.

ISLES.

BERGERON.

COME ONNN ISLES!

ohhh mann

At 4/14/07 08:56 PM, Twerpo wrote:

At 4/14/07 06:03 PM, hongkongexpress wrote: BLAH BLAH BLAH Datsyuk's pronounced wrong.

So how's it supposed to be pronounced?

Dat-syuk?

Dat-sook is how it's pronounced

At 4/15/07 05:00 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 4/14/07 08:56 PM, Twerpo wrote:

At 4/14/07 06:03 PM, hongkongexpress wrote: BLAH BLAH BLAH Datsyuk's pronounced wrong.

So how's it supposed to be pronounced?

Dat-syuk?

Dat-sook is how it's pronounced

So what was the point of the whole rant?