The first Pandemic was better...
I had like 75% of the population dead...but now i jst can't kill that much of ppl because of the damned cure!
The first Pandemic was better...
I had like 75% of the population dead...but now i jst can't kill that much of ppl because of the damned cure!
Meh..
It was Ok.. Its either im not that good at it or its just too hard.. and most of the time im good at games. I like the idea of it tho.
lol good job agian
i was waiting for you to make another one good job
Lame
To be honest it was really lacked in comparision to the first...
On almost all of the options the outcome appeared to be entirely random which is slightly ridiculous that at one point I used 10 points and only increased the infectivity in one country by 1% with an infectivity of like 3, that doesn't sound right.
Like someone earlier said, why would the countries immediatly begin working on a simple almost uninfectious, not even deadly, virus?
In the first one we were certainly given alot more options of what to do with the virus. It made me think alot of the game Spore, it should be alot more like that. In this one you only have 3 options as opposed to the whole interface from the last one.
All-in-all, it wasn't bad. Just a major downgrade from the original.
3/5
WTF
This is WORSE than the original one man. yea you gave us a choice of what we wanted to do but it almost never worked. MUCH WORSE THAN THE FIRST