At 2/27/09 02:03 AM, Random-Her03 wrote:
i dunno, i just think it wasn't his time yet, and i think wwe had the same feelings thats why i think they've taken him back down to the IC title scene.
I'm fine with the idea that "look, I don't believe the guy was ready". That's a perfectly fine and logical opinion to hold, I tend to hold pretty much the same opinion because they really haven't developed that character to that point yet. BUT, they GAVE him MITB. They PUT the WHC on him. They booked him ineffectively, and then not only did he get bumped down the card, but he never got to work a program with Orton. It's the same kind of thing they've done to Kofi Kingston really. The guy got attacked by somebody higher up the card (Edge) lost something which is of extreme value (the spot in the Chamber) which then lead to his attacker prospering greatly (Edge wins the match and the World title) Kofi has done NOTHING to get retribution, which tells people "don't take Kofi seriously, because he's not on the level of Edge". You believe that to be true? Then you don't book those guys to cross paths. You can't keep beating guys down and showing the audience "they aren't worthy" and expect that impression not to stick. That's my basic issue with what happened to Punk, they put him at a certain level, they showed no faith or desire to keep him there, and then dropped him back down. He was nothing more then a proxy to get that belt to RAW and that sucks, he deserves way better then that.
he's been in the company for almost 3 years now, i've seen him in plenty of segments, as a matter of fact everytime i used to turn on ECW he used to be on there talking. like i said, he's not boring, he does have the basic mic skills.. it was just not what i expected
Is he really being given an extended chance to talk though? He doesn't get the time that a lot of other guys do, even in ECW when he was main eventing. RVD got lots of TV Time too, but it's not just about putting a guy on tv, it's about making what he does memorable. How much chance has Punk really been given to do anything memorable? Really and truly do something memorable?
many sources said that he was instantly in the doghouse backstage because of his cocky behaviour just coming red hot off of ROH. he was also rubbing road agents the wrong way with his sarcastic attitude.
Cite some please, because I can cite a source (www.pwinsider.com) who have legitimate contacts within the WWE who have said numerous times that there is a shitload of POLITICS going on in that company and that guys can get heat for something as simple as not saying hello to every single person at a show. Guys get threatened when new talents come in, especially new talents that might be able to outwork them or take their spots, so they try to bury them. WWE also is very down on anybody who was a star on the indies feeling the guy somehow has to be broken down and molded into the WWE way, even when they've done nothing to display a bad attitude (which is what WWE will say is the reason they do what they do).
also i got into a conversation with a guy on youtube, who had a video of him in photos with various wrestlers, he said that everyone was nice, except for CM Punk who refused to take pictures or sign autographs for any of the fans the whole night. I dunno if you even don't respect the fans then thats not really saying that he's deserving.
So, the word of some guy is now gospel? Really? I would ask if this guy approached Punk in a proper situation (I.E. at an autograph signing) or if he approached him in an improper situation (such as in a restaurant where he's eating). It could also be a bad day, or a personal choice on his part. Undertaker will not sign autographs for anyone except young kids, does that mean he disrespects his fan base? To me it just seems like a personal choice unless his demeanor is, or he outright says "I'm too good to sign for you". Randy Orton takes joy in not signing autographs and pissing on people, he has admitted to it in many interviews. I can also think of numerous articles I've seen where Punk has done things for charity, autograph signings, and other fan appreciation functions. So sorry, I like my sources for this kind of information vs. "some guy on youtube".
you've got a bit of a point, but do you remember shawn back then? he was amazing, he would throw punches, kicks, submission moves, fly off the top rope, take risks and he was amazing on the mic, also it seems like he's learnt his lesson about his past, becoming a born again christian...
Sure, but I think he's still got some of those bad habits from what I hear. But Punk is also a pretty good and amazing worker right now the fans are getting behind and he has had good to great matches with a number of talents of all levels in the company and can't get ahead. So again I say something that Mickey Rourke's character mentions to another indie guy he's working in The Wrestler "You got a lot of talent kid, but it's not about talent, it's about politics and if the man driving the cadillac likes you"
i dunno man, you got ur opinions, i got mine.. we can't all have the same interests
Yeah, and that's fine, I'm not saying you have to like what I like, or like who I like. My only point and problem here is if you don't like a guy, don't like him for good, sourcable reasons. If you don't like their work or their skills on the mic, fine. But because of some guy on youtube, because of information from faulty sources with their own agenda? Nah, that's not fair. That's not fair to the worker, and it's not fair to yourself I think. But yeah, public forum so I invite folks to question my thoughts anytime, just know I'm gonna question you right back if I think it's warranted.