Dreams
But Toast i dunno about you but sometimes in my dreams i have full control over them and sometimes i can have conversations with people not using memories but more like visual representation of thoughts...
HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
It gets better. I took a shitload of acid brain-drugs and it knocked me out in like ten minutes, and in reference to that I had a dream where a bunch of smart people wanted to hunt me down to blow me up to prevent the world from imploding, the middle of the dream I don't remember too well but in the end they gave me some kind of drugs that would seperate me from my brain and then I remember waiting as my brain started overclocking and I observed how particles move around me (in reference to Dust, probably) and then I had a brainquake feeling and it looked like the world was collapsing though everyone just stood and watched, and then it stopped and I felt like a tingley feeling consuming my senses and I was trying to see, but everything lost shape and color and it reduced to blackness, the next thing I knew was that I could see fine and I felt like I had woken up and was 'phew!' but then I saw it was still a dream, just without me there, and after that I knew the world was starting to implode and then stars fell in a consuming blur, and there wasn't anything left, and then I popped out in my bed.
(There are three sentances in this post.)
you know gust if you star at that sentence long enough you can see a spaceship
RE:Sketchbook 2007
Can't be time for another one of those yet. It's not been six months since the last one, surely?
But yeah. I'd be ready for another one of those
Remove me from the Missing Persons List
Work is good. Working on Flash for a living is very good. Especially for the pay I'll be getting
Not having the net at home is not good, because I can't come here and pester you lot. Not being able to get Virgin Media (formerly NTL) to install broadband because they only install when I'm at work is bad.
What did I miss in the month I've not been checking this site religiously?
...
At 2/9/07 08:52 AM, KaynSlamdyke wrote: Remove me from the Missing Persons List
:D!
At 2/9/07 07:00 AM, Peturo wrote: Dreams
But Toast i dunno about you but sometimes in my dreams i have full control over them and sometimes i can have conversations with people not using memories but more like visual representation of thoughts...
That doesn't mean your dreams communicate with you and send you deeply philosophical messages, does it? :P
No, it doesn't mean anything, but there it is. I can quite easily tell symbolic meanings, watch some (really childish) cartoons and see.
Armorgames
Looks like they got themselfs into a bit of trouble
http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=65 2583&page=1
Read page 1, 3 and 6.
:( its a shame cause dan is such a nice person.
Me chips
Got a great big bowl of chips here.
Home made, deep fried and oily.
Got a few slices of bread and a pool of brown sauce next to it, and some coffee to the side (for some reason).
It's gonna be a great half hour :D
RE: ArmorGames
At 2/9/07 10:25 AM, fuzz wrote: Looks like they got themselfs into a bit of trouble
http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=65 2583&page=1
What the hell?
Can somebody who actually has a good idea of what's going on please explain it to me?
Armor games
Basically a site called lord bing was found. It was a complete rip off of newgrounds and had lots of ng content stolen and put on it. The ng community found it their duty to spam the forums etc, the owner of lordbling.com then closed it down. It was soon found that the owner was armorgames. He and mindchamber had a big brawl and mindchamber told him to "suck his dick".
The general forum now has no respect for inglor. :(:(:(
RE: Dreams
After having read nothing but the title, in clnclusion Toast is wrong because he's 13 and his brain can't possibly understand the things we're talking about.
Lord Bling
That was handled way to immaturely. I wouldn't expect that from a mod, especially, MindChamber.
RE: Lordbling
Wait, whats this about? Dan from AG made a NG ripoff? Anyone got any screenshots? How close to NG was it?
It sounds like quite a stupid thing to do. Especially from someone who already owns a sucessful site. Surely if he was going to delibrately copy a site, he'd make it more discreet than how everyone was describing it.
At 2/9/07 11:23 AM, Cybex wrote: RE: Lordbling
Wait, whats this about? Dan from AG made a NG ripoff? Anyone got any screenshots? How close to NG was it?
Did you read the topic about it in the general forum? I didn't see any screenshots but apparently it was pretty close.
http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/user_images/pic s/1/11756000/ngbbs45cbb8f5edc9b.gif
Age is not a strict term. Someone like Toast can easily offer a better opinion than most sixteen-year-olds.
RE: Lordbling
At 2/9/07 11:24 AM, CitricSquid wrote: I saw the thread when i got up this morning, the site was so much like NG, color scheme was the same, banner looked same-y.
Was terribly like NG.
Still, simply using the same colour scheme as another website is a pretty weak argument for the level of spam and crap through that thread. And the headers don't look that much similar apart from the fact that the sky is orange and the background is a black shadow.
Does anyone have an archived version of it or something?
At 2/9/07 11:32 AM, Paranoia wrote: Still, simply using the same colour scheme as another website is a pretty weak argument for the level of spam and crap through that thread.
Its pretty sad, huh? I'd like to see a screenshot too.
At 2/9/07 11:32 AM, Paranoia wrote: Still, simply using the same colour scheme as another website is a pretty weak argument for the level of spam and crap through that thread. And the headers don't look that much similar apart from the fact that the sky is orange and the background is a black shadow.
That's why the main point was the content consisting entirely of blatantly stolen games.
At 2/9/07 11:41 AM, DarkMana wrote: But they weren't actually stolen, they were games already sponsored by AG, right?
That's what i was thinking earlier but then what about the movies? I think that if the games are sponsored by AG they can be on there because AG gets distributing rights for the games they sponsor.
Re: Lord Bling
I am not going to comment too much on the situation at hand, since I am both a NG Mod and an Armor Games employee, but I feel like I should say something. I have gotten nearly 20 people coming online to ask me what's going on since yesterday, I would like to make the flash forum announcement that there were some shit that went down yesterday that probably shouldn't have. No, he didn't tell me to write this, and no, I didn't write this to make me look better to my boss or Newgrounds. This is just my personal opinion from what I have experienced.
Dan was in no way trying to steal Newgrounds. The site was designed independently from a website developer, and somehow it escaped design Quality Assurance when it got to Armor and was put up for testing. The site was still in a good bit of development, so it wasn't a complete project either.... there was still plenty of changes being made to the site. But there was people crying foul play already when the thread came up yesterday, so Dan took the site down, as much as NG users thought this was a "war" and a "battle against Newgrounds". Dan apologized for this mistake to everyone, but people found it in their hearts to create an enemy out of Dan, regardless of his contributions to Newgrounds and his support of the Flash community.
But why would Dan want to steal Newgrounds? Armor Games and Newgrounds have always had a good relationship. Both support the Flash community, and both feed each other content. There's no better way to drive traffic from one another. Armor Games is the #1 affiliate on the network. Newgrounds and Armor came together for a contest last Christmas. It's a relationship that really had no reason to be compromised by Dan.
All I am trying to say is to be a bit more critical of the situation than what it stated on that thread. I am saying this as knowing Dan personally and because there have been several other threads that erupted past the point of validity before on General. I feel like we made a mistake, but at the same time, it wasn't right for this kind of attack to happen.
I really wanted to stay out of this mess, but it looks like I can't with everyone being all "OMG lets attack LB like Ebaums!" I don't understand why people need something to hate to make themselves feel like they are part of something.
In all honestly, I was hoping the Flash forum would stay out of this. This seemed like a General forum kind of drama, and was hoping that like the General forum today, we could move on to something else besides bashing Dan.
Hi there!
Jmtb's rant
Wait, so Dan hadn't even seen the layout before it was put up?
Also, LordBLING? Call the chav-bregade!
We're not really bashing Dan or anyone. Your point is clear to me, but I keep in mind that the few screenshots I saw really did look like NG.
At 2/9/07 11:52 AM, jmtb02 wrote: Re: Lord Bling
Stuff
I agree with you about the fact that NG and AG have helped out each other out with traffic as well as the fact they both contribute alot to the community. The people in the General forum love drama. Personally, I don't care about sites that try to rip-off NG [Not that i'm saying LB did]. They may look like NG but they never will be and most likely won't even get popular and if they did get popular it would be because of negative attention.
RE: Lordbling
At 2/9/07 11:50 AM, atomic-noodle wrote: That's what i was thinking earlier but then what about the movies? I think that if the games are sponsored by AG they can be on there because AG gets distributing rights for the games they sponsor.
Well I read something in the thread about Decline or something like that being there, but as far as I'm aware AG and the SFB are totally cool with each other. I can't really form an opinion without seeing the site, but so far it looks like a lot of the NG community are being total arses about it.
At 2/9/07 11:52 AM, jmtb02 wrote: No, he didn't tell me to write this, and no, I didn't write this to make me look better to my boss or Newgrounds. This is just my personal opinion from what I have experienced.
I'm glad someone's shedding a little light on the situation :P
But there was people crying foul play already when the thread came up yesterday, so Dan took the site down, as much as NG users thought this was a "war" and a "battle against Newgrounds". Dan apologized for this mistake to everyone, but people found it in their hearts to create an enemy out of Dan, regardless of his contributions to Newgrounds and his support of the Flash community.
I really am disappointed with how fast people demonised him for it. I know from personal experience how awesome Dan is when it comes to Flash artists and things, and I'd think the least Newgrounds could do for him given all that he's done is allow him to give an explaination without getting flamed to buggery.
Newgrounds and Armor came together for a contest last Christmas. It's a relationship that really had no reason to be compromised by Dan.
Sadly I don't think that most people dug that deep when they started flaming.
All I am trying to say is to be a bit more critical of the situation than what it stated on that thread. I am saying this as knowing Dan personally and because there have been several other threads that erupted past the point of validity before on General. I feel like we made a mistake, but at the same time, it wasn't right for this kind of attack to happen.
Even if it was a stupid thing to do, there's no call to react as was seen on that thread. It was, to my best knowledge, something that's never happened before with AG, and everyone's known to make misjudgements and stupid mistakes every now and again.
I really wanted to stay out of this mess, but it looks like I can't with everyone being all "OMG lets attack LB like Ebaums!" I don't understand why people need something to hate to make themselves feel like they are part of something.
It's the hysteria about Flash-stealing sites that's still with us. I hate people who make profit off of other peoples work without permission or even contacting them as much as anyone, but there's nothing to be gained from simply resorting to childish spam, especially when you don't even come close to knowing the full story.
In all honestly, I was hoping the Flash forum would stay out of this. This seemed like a General forum kind of drama, and was hoping that like the General forum today, we could move on to something else besides bashing Dan.
Hopefully the Flash forum is slightly more mature and well informed; enough at least not to just back Dan with no more justification than an overblown and unclear story.
Re: Lord Bling
I agree with John. Dan has given a lot to NG and AG is a great affiliate. I've never seen anything but total honesty from Dan and AG, so i've got no reason to doubt them.
Anyway, i'll not write to much, or i'll just bum myself out. Can we please stop talking about this now, i can see this turning into another 4 page depresathon.
*cough*hacking topic*cough*
;)
I'm not trying to blame AG, i think they're great and stuff, but in all fairness whoever came up with the layout and graphics ideas are a bit stupid.
I really hope it was no one who works in AG full time, because from the banner gust linked to and the layout itself (http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:qNDMRo3 pUe8J:www.lordbling.com/+lordbling&hl=en&ct=c lnk&cd=1&gl=uk), i think its fairly obvious that the layout is just a NG copy.
I think its stupid how everyone jumped to conclusions assuming it was Dan, but the designer of the site and layout (hope its no one i know) needs to be looked at by someone with a white coat. Did he honestly think no one would notice?
That being said, i feel really sorry for AG for the bad publicity this has given them, and hope it all clears out soon.
At 2/9/07 12:15 PM, Cybex wrote: I think its stupid how everyone jumped to conclusions assuming it was Dan, but the designer of the site and layout (hope its no one i know) needs to be looked at by someone with a white coat. Did he honestly think no one would notice?
Yeah, Everyone jumped on Dan. Its not like he designed it. People should go the guy that designed the site.
