00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme
Upgrade Your Account!

HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!

We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!

Become a Supporter so NG can see another Christmas!

The Flash 'Reg' Lounge

3,086,202 Views | 60,186 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-18 23:29:51


At 4/18/10 11:15 PM, Duchednier wrote:
Heres what the 3DS looks like I would personally say that if nintendo can pull this off well, they will advance 3D in a way that nobody else has. Being able to turn the screen and see different angles will most definitely advance the 3D gaming industry. its cool stuff :)

The trailer they show, the second game specifically, scares me.

Lining up the 3d to make a letter? Can't they use the 3d as part of the experience rather than just making it the core gameplay? I donno, I feel like when they do this it just means the rest of the games that come out will do the exact same, just like what happened with the Wii....

There will be a few shining gems that use the 3d well though (such as just using it as a view control system in place of dual analog sticks, and not making every game based around the fact that you can rotate the camera without them)


the events are merely fictional, written, directed, and acted out by all who create them

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 00:18:12


Btw... not sure if any of you have/use the PS3 eye.

It fucking sucks.

Room isn't bright enough? Doesn't work.
Room behind you doesn't have enough contrast? Doesn't work.

Fuck that piece of crap. I spent like $80.00 on it for an enhanced gaming experience. It fell behind my TV a year ago, and I haven't bothered to look for it.

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 05:02:20


wtf is with this bumping faggot? CUT THAT SHIT OUT >:(


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 07:51:26


At 4/19/10 06:20 AM, vvasim wrote:
At 4/19/10 05:02 AM, Jimp wrote: wtf is with this bumping faggot? CUT THAT SHIT OUT >:(
thats me

is vvassim the russian wasim?

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 09:19:37


At 4/19/10 07:51 AM, Duchednier wrote: is vvassim the russian wasim?

could you tell me where the nuclear wessels are?


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 13:20:23


At 4/15/10 12:49 AM, Toast wrote: I'll answer each of your points separately as I am not actually elaborating views of my own, but instead only responding to your views.

A fascist? Are you serious? I thought you guys were wiped off the planet in the 40's. Let's see what interesting political ideas you have to share with us, shall we?

No, they exist in an awful lot of places, just like to not label themselves as fascists as it doesn't go down too well.

Hey bro. Check this out - one of them is the european union, and the other one is some random country in our world. Does it look to you like the EU would be the biggest country in the world?

In the sense of economical power.

Also, when exactly did you get the idea that EU is going to become a country? I don't see how it could happen anywhere in the foreseeable future. The EU is an economical and political union, it's been that way for decades and I don't see why it should suddenly change. It seems like all along your post you make senseless comments because you are confused about what the European Union is and what it aims to achieve - you keep talking about the EU as a single country.

Oh come on, it's going that way, just think about it. The single market, the increasing power of the the European Parliament, the growing military forces. I would not be surprised if the whole thing keeps on merging closer and closer towards a 'sovereign state'.

but I hate superpowers that have that much wealth, power and diversity.
Oh, so now it's personal? You think the UK should pull out of the EU because you hate countries that have too much power? That makes sense. Not only that, but you seem to be misunderstanding the purpose of the EU. The union seeks to balance the economy across Europe.

Indeed it would be a good thing to balance out the economy but will it really make that much of a difference? All I really see is the economy being more vulnerable as we'll all be relying off one another, which sounds good but as demonstrated by the banking crisis in America followed shortly by much of the world, if one goes down it can take the rest with it.

You seem to be thinking that the EU will create some sort of super-country to dominate the world, where in fact it teams up with the poorer and less fortunate. You want a super power? Get France, Germany, England, and a couple other countries in Western Europe on your team and you get the majority of the wealth and political power in the western world.

Indeed, but the wealth spread across the entire Eu as a whole is still huge even with these countries. I do believe that the union was originally meant to be just that, a union, but now the lines have begun to seem a tad blurry.

Also, I hate to break it to you but there's really no diversity at all in Western Europe. You brits might think that the French are from another planet just because they eat cheese and speak funny, but in reality we're all the same.

Think of the diversity all the way from Finland to Spain. There's more diversity as a whole than at first thoughts. Just think about al the different attitudes, cultures and heritages in that small space of land.

You want to see some diversity? Try to unite North Korea with Germany and Syria.

Lol. :)

Let me get this straight: you think that agricultural efforts like the CAP can't work in Europe because of a too high variety of ethnicities? What exactly is going on in your mind? Have a look at this figure - it's the total spendings of the EU (labels in the description). Over 75% of their spendings are just on agriculture and construction / infrastructure. How are their efforts going to get penalized by the "many different ethnicities"? I would like to know.

As Kirk pointed out, the EU has the power to decide fishing limits. While such things are necessary in matters of conservation and that crap, British people still feel that the EU has no right to govern anything about them. What makes other countries different?

Russia

Okay, I admit this was stupid statement and no comment be needed here, I just wonder why the heck in our history lessons in school we learn that an important reason for the collapse of Russia was because of the size? GSCE education just lies to us. :(


Equal rights? Pah! I laugh at your silly ideals, human. Are you implying that being in the EU distracts your country from providing equal rights to its citizens? I see no logical connection in this as a reason for your opposition to the EU. I don't know how you want your government to mix social classes and ethnicities. Maybe invite all the billionaires to a tea party with the construction workers and the black people? That's going to have such a great impact on the country.

For much of history the rich and the poor have lived very close together. Unluckily the rich were often not as generous as one would like even though they knew the extent of the squalor around them. In recent centuries though this has broken down and now generally the rich live near the rich and the poor near the poor. Assuming such things as the 'The Civilising Process' are correct people in the modern day may be more obliged to help those that live around them in turns of financial help.
I suppose we can make no assumptions though.

The mindless ideas that you spout are not only laughable due to their complete irrelevance to the modern world, but also can't be achieved in any realistic way. The EU is actually getting shit done: constructing infrastructure, handles agriculture, and boosts the European market. But screw that! Let's work on mixing social classes instead, because that will make a true change in our world! Cool!

The EU is bollocks, we're bleeding money left right and center here, Britain's got its own problems to worry about, nevermind Europe's.


Facism: extreme nationalism, full focus on internal economics, political isolation and lack of collaboration with the rest of the world. Governmental support for big companies and business.
Communism: an effort to unite the workers of the world and form a nationless society with a strong emphasis on equality and opposition to any kind of currency.

I'd love to see how you can mix those. They pretty much stand for opposite things.

The fascist ideals of strong military, strong justice, strong government.
Communist ideas of a welfare state, equality, tolerance.


Unbelievable. Get a clue, kid. You puny teenagers with your revolutionary political ideas make me sick.

Okay, let's here your views Toast as that made it personal.

Deadclever23,

That's right, put someone down over there username.


Your vulgarization of political ideologies and ignorance in historical events is an insult to the internets. The reasons you provided to support your view opposing the European union are without any form of thought and common sense. This is why I was so bold in my last reply to you. It's clear that your political views originate from vague things that you may have heard people say, or seen on television or on the internet, and not from actual thought and research or education.

Toast is seems like you are blind to the truth of the EU. I'm not a conspiracist but I think that the EU will become a country. Not necessarily by intention but by slowly blurring the lines of power between the EU and national governments.


"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all."

- Oscar Wilde

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 17:53:14


Time to take a dive into some raycasting.

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 18:32:43


At 4/19/10 05:53 PM, Archon68 wrote: Time to take a dive into some raycasting.

Deadclever and Toast, plz take this to personal messages! Its turning from debating to insulting each others beliefs on the topic :/

On a different topic..

I personally believe that NASA should go on an exploratory mission to the sun. Theoretically such a mission would be possible during the night.

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 18:49:09


At 4/19/10 06:32 PM, Duchednier wrote: I personally believe that NASA should go on an exploratory mission to the sun. Theoretically such a mission would be possible during the night.

Oh my, oh my, what a severe misunderstanding of how nighttime works.

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 19:15:23


At 4/19/10 06:49 PM, Archon68 wrote:
At 4/19/10 06:32 PM, Duchednier wrote: I personally believe that NASA should go on an exploratory mission to the sun. Theoretically such a mission would be possible during the night.
Oh my, oh my, what a severe misunderstanding of how nighttime works.

I do belive it was a joke good sir.


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 19:25:25


LOL

On a different topic..

I personally believe that NASA should go on an exploratory mission to the sun. Theoretically such a mission would be possible during the night.

lol. Your Kidding right?
The sun is a nuclear bomb that explodes every second. Thats a crude explanation of how things work their. Now imagine a Satellite even getting a little close to the Sun. It would quickly burn it. Also, take to taught the Suns gravitational pull.

( I had a smart moment)

VG STUFF

At 4/19/10 12:18 AM, Johnny wrote: Btw... not sure if any of you have/use the PS3 eye.

It fucking sucks.

Room isn't bright enough? Doesn't work.
Room behind you doesn't have enough contrast? Doesn't work.

Really? Wow/


Fuck that piece of crap. I spent like $80.00 on it for an enhanced gaming experience. It fell behind my TV a year ago, and I haven't bothered to look for it.

I think the PlayStation Motion is under 100 $ including the PS Eye.

BROWSERS

But in the end it's always Google Chrome that wins.]
I had problems with google chrome and running flash smoothly, youtube, newgrounds, all of that lagged on google chrome, so imma stick with FF/Safari

Really? Hmmm. Thats weird.



Firefox is complete shiz. It's a horrible browser, to me.
...uhh...elaborate?

Lag, slow download speeds (which only happens on FF for me), takes forever to open, and a whole bunch of other things.

NEW STUFF


NEW VIDEO GAME STUFF

Search up Playstation Motion Google. You would think it's a Wii copy, but it really is better. Better games, better gear, better evrything. Will it replace the Wii? I don't think so. The Wii will forever be a Family System in the minds of parents. The PS3 has always been a Bloody, Shoot em up system to my parents.
Well first of all its called Playstation Move, and its a sexy combination of Natal and the Wii (its a wand combined with the PSeye) , resulting in a depthular gaming experience that will definitely be entertaining.

lol I made a typo.

And yes, it looks great and all, but I'm tired of this "Motion" stuff. I'm gonna stick with my controller.


I'm not certain it would take over the Wii, but it will definitely be a solid competition for nintendo and perhaps take some market share from the wii there.

Mabye, but like I said, the Wii will always be with the hearts of Families of young kids. (Which takes a pretty big part of the Nintendos industry)


Also Search up 3DS. What it is, it's te DS, but the games are in 3D, glasses free.
Idk know much about it yet since it hasn't shown up at E3 yet. It doesn't look all that great, but meh.

Heres what the 3DS looks like I would personally say that if nintendo can pull this off well, they will advance 3D in a way that nobody else has. Being able to turn the screen and see different angles will most definitely advance the 3D gaming industry. its cool stuff :)

It will definitely be awesome if Nintendo can do it.
I can see a whole lot of Mario games already coming.


I am a FAB

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 20:05:13


At 4/19/10 07:15 PM, Depredation wrote:
At 4/19/10 06:49 PM, Archon68 wrote:
At 4/19/10 06:32 PM, Duchednier wrote: I personally believe that NASA should go on an exploratory mission to the sun. Theoretically such a mission would be possible during the night.
Oh my, oh my, what a severe misunderstanding of how nighttime works.
I do belive it was a joke good sir.

It truly was :P

One of my biggest fears is that while crossing a street, a delorian driving 88 miles per hour will appear with a loud bang leaving nothing behind but my body splattered along a 10 ft stretch and flaming tire marks.

Am I the only one who feels this way?

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 20:14:20


Poor NASA. They were dealt a heavy blow by Burt Rutan, Paul Allen, and Richard Branson, at least in the orbital vehicle department. Their solution is so much cheaper and more efficient. Still NASA does serve a purpose beyond those notions, and everyone with half a brain knows it. The Int'l Space Station is dope (and will become a shipyard for serious exploration), and it'll only get better, especially if flights to it cost 450,000 dollars instead of 450 million dollars. I was also pleased to hear about NASA's new found interest in exploring gigantic near-Earth asteroids. That had been 'off-the-table' for a bit.


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 20:52:13


At 4/19/10 07:25 PM, Farza wrote: Mabye, but like I said, the Wii will always be with the hearts of Families of young kids. (Which takes a pretty big part of the Nintendos industry)

But it probably makes up less than 15% of the gaming industry as a whole.

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 21:30:38


At 4/19/10 08:14 PM, doctormario wrote: Poor NASA. They were dealt a heavy blow by Burt Rutan, Paul Allen, and Richard Branson, at least in the orbital vehicle department. Their solution is so much cheaper and more efficient.

I know people who work for NASA. They know all about that crap.


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 21:57:05


LOL

The Flash 'Reg' Lounge


The water in Majorca don't taste like what it oughta.

| AS3: Main | AS2: Main | Flash Tutorials |

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 22:24:19



The water in Majorca don't taste like what it oughta.

| AS3: Main | AS2: Main | Flash Tutorials |

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 22:56:31


Here I come.
Here I go.


MY E-PENIS IS BIGGER THAN YOURS

8=================================>

...and this is my fag...

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 23:14:53


At 4/19/10 08:52 PM, Archon68 wrote:
At 4/19/10 07:25 PM, Farza wrote: Mabye, but like I said, the Wii will always be with the hearts of Families of young kids. (Which takes a pretty big part of the Nintendos industry)
But it probably makes up less than 15% of the gaming industry as a whole.

I think nintendo is THE best game company in existance TO DATE. The reason for this is not only because they provide great games, but they provide FUN gaming experiences and thats ALL.

An example of this is how the wii doesn't play dvd's, i mean im sure it woulda been cheap to throw it into the console. But the wii is simply a console that stands on this pillar of "Just games" and i mean come on, the wii brings families and friends together, i know whenever my friends come over we always get a few rounds of wii sports resort or brawl in. Like, nintendo is REALLY doing things right.

Thats not to say the other guys are POOR game companies, they're just solidifying themselves as something else. Playstation is like this massive untapped raw power that is only really showing what it can do now, and is being marketed as a home entertainment system, which is what it is.

And Xbox fouses heavily on online gameplay, and their online experience is MUCH better than both sony's and nintendo's.

Yay videogame rant

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-19 23:42:30


At 4/19/10 08:52 PM, Archon68 wrote: But it probably makes up less than 15% of the gaming industry as a whole.

Actually, casual gamers and the like don't get the credit they deserve, and EASILY eclipse standard or 'hard core' gamers by a huge percentage.

Really, the largest volume of 'games' are still played on PCs and as far as just consoles are concerned, the Wii made up massive 43% of the total market share in '09... so almost half, in a market with 3 primary consoles.

And notice, both the Move and Natal will require light to work (PS3 will require a moderate amount of light and Natal will require at least ambient light) which is a huge downer for those of us that like playing games in the dark.

(And again, I have nothing nice to say about the horrific implementation of the PS3 eye.)

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 00:53:33


At 4/19/10 11:42 PM, Johnny wrote:
And notice, both the Move and Natal will require light to work (PS3 will require a moderate amount of light and Natal will require at least ambient light) which is a huge downer for those of us that like playing games in the dark.

For some reason, at this part, the whole time i was reading it i was thinking "Where's he going with this, people who don't have electricity for lights?" and that got into "How do they plug in the ps3 then...?"

What a twist at the end though hey?

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 01:20:27


What a twist at the end though hey?

HELL YEAH


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 10:15:37


At 4/20/10 09:57 AM, vvasim wrote: i jerk off everytime while readin these posts

nice interjection, newly refound, mature, wasim!!!

Nintendo is cool I guess. I hear a lot more people loving DS games than PSP games and I still love their classic titles. Maybe they switched to Wii instead of continuing using standardized controllers because they have been putting out games longer than the other companies? I have a feeling they thought they were creating one 'type' of gaming experience.

But really there were a few signs. Nintendo loves the fact that people can all play 'together'. N64 had FOUR players standard, built into the system. Playstation did not. They've always wanted to bring people to together locally, which is something I believe in as well.

Playing some games out there get realllyyy boring playing them online with fake people. I think it just appeals because it's convenient.


the events are merely fictional, written, directed, and acted out by all who create them

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 10:39:03


I dislike Nintendo for what they did with the Wii (opening the floodgates to low quality casual crap). The only time I would enjoy playing with the Wii is when I'm drunk and looking for something to do with friends, only then would I be able to enjoy a few of the huge arse catalog of party games the console seems to have. I'm looking for aspects in games that to my knowledge only a handful of Wii games seem to offer, such as immersion, emotion, proper storylines, lasting gameplay mechanics etc. The lack of proper titles and serious third party support is also appalling. I respect Nintendo for what they have done in the past, but I think the Wii is an absolute piece of crap for gamers like myself, it's okay for grandma's (which is the only tartgetgroup they make ads for nowadays) though.


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 11:03:26


At 4/20/10 09:57 AM, vvasim wrote: i jerk off everytime while readin these posts

Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people. Children, dead people.

That's sick.

"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all."

- Oscar Wilde

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 11:43:14


Wii got streaming Netflix recently.

Where's your "No Movies, Just Games" theory now?!

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 12:29:04


At 4/20/10 10:39 AM, Xeptic wrote: I dislike Nintendo for what they did with the Wii

Most of the things you listed are also reasons people love the wii. It's cheap, and the games are fun. I would also like to see nintendo bust out a real console again though.


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 12:33:23


At 4/20/10 12:29 PM, Coaly wrote:
At 4/20/10 10:39 AM, Xeptic wrote: I dislike Nintendo for what they did with the Wii
Most of the things you listed are also reasons people love the wii. It's cheap, and the games are fun. I would also like to see nintendo bust out a real console again though.

I know, they are hardly the most objective arguments :) I wonder what's going to happen in the next generation, I fear a WIi-H3D.


BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 14:12:17


At 4/19/10 05:53 PM, Archon68 wrote: Time to take a dive into some raycasting.

3d already? :)


"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all."

- Oscar Wilde

BBS Signature

Response to The Flash 'Reg' Lounge 2010-04-20 15:33:49


At 4/20/10 02:12 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: 3d already? :)

No, just some 2D light/shadow effects. Still hard to get right.