HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
Physics Problem
Right, so I was thinking.
If, black holes have infinite mass then then how come they
don't have infinite gravitational pull because of infinite gravitational force?
Shouldn't our universe be sucked in totally then by a black hole?
Hmm, I'm confused.
Please someone explain.
At 3/29/09 12:50 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: Physics Problem
If, black holes have infinite mass
wrong, black holes do NOT, i repeat NOT have infinite mass; they have a very real, very finite mass.
Black holes 'do' have an infinitesimal size, and thus infinite density.
At 3/29/09 12:50 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: If, black holes have infinite mass then then how come they
don't have infinite gravitational pull because of infinite gravitational force?
They don't, they're just dense. Instead of thinking so much you could've like checked Wikipedia or something.
Let's stop talking down to each other now, shall we? I'm looking at you here, Gust :P
At 3/29/09 12:56 PM, dELtaluca wrote:At 3/29/09 12:50 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: Physics Problemwrong, black holes do NOT, i repeat NOT have infinite mass; they have a very real, very finite mass.
If, black holes have infinite mass
Black holes 'do' have an infinitesimal size, and thus infinite density.
Fair enough thanks for this.
I learnt something here.
I'm not, I only invariably always sound like I am. :p
As I usually find everything on my own I like telling people to be more independent whenever they ask obvious advice of any kind. Should I give up on hoping they'd stop wasting their and everyone's time like that? (Well, I know, probably, but I won't unless I'm told to.)
S, wait a sec.
I thought mass depended on density.
So if something has infinite density how does it not have infinite mass?
Mass = Density * volume.
At 3/29/09 01:24 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: S, wait a sec.
I thought mass depended on density.
So if something has infinite density how does it not have infinite mass?
The volume is infinitesimal. The mass can be anything.
At 3/29/09 01:24 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: Mass = Density * volume.
Density = Mass / Volume
what
At 3/29/09 02:35 PM, K-Guare wrote: Density = Mass / Volume
Agh, I'm stupid. Ignore me for not thinking that correction through.
I'm just too used to seeing it the other way. :/
what
Summer Holidays
Me and my friends were planning to have this epic road trip in the US next summer and this week we've finally booked our tickets to New York and back again from San Francisco and we've rented a Chevrolet Uplander for 4 weeks to cruise us around the country. This is going to be the best holiday ever :D Now, we've already listed a couple of sights to see obviously but if any of the people who actually live or have been to the US have a couple of must-sees I'd love to know those. We haven't really set down a definite route so far, with 4 weeks to drive around we figured we have enough time to take a few detours.
Also, how would I go bout making this game fun to play (mouse to aim and shoot, space to reload, enter for powerups)?
At 3/29/09 01:47 PM, GustTheASGuy wrote:At 3/29/09 01:24 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: S, wait a sec.The volume is infinitesimal. The mass can be anything.
I thought mass depended on density.
So if something has infinite density how does it not have infinite mass?
Anything finite and within reason, so as to avoid the problem that started this whole mess :/
At 3/28/09 03:42 PM, marcusp3 wrote:At 3/28/09 03:18 PM, MichaelHurst wrote: Blackle is black, which uses less watts of electricity and it works exactly the same as google.Actually, it's been disapproved as bullshit. It doesn't matter what colour pixels are displayed, uses the same amount of energy.
Agreed, back light? Google still is win, sorry Blackle.
At 3/29/09 05:44 PM, Zuggz wrote:At 3/28/09 03:42 PM, marcusp3 wrote:Agreed, back light? Google still is win, sorry Blackle.At 3/28/09 03:18 PM, MichaelHurst wrote: Blackle is black, which uses less watts of electricity and it works exactly the same as google.Actually, it's been disapproved as bullshit. It doesn't matter what colour pixels are displayed, uses the same amount of energy.
I wouldn't be surprised if someone came up with a monitor at some point which just shut off black regions. 'Till then, though...
At 3/29/09 05:48 PM, Paranoia wrote: I wouldn't be surprised if someone came up with a monitor at some point which just shut off black regions. 'Till then, though...
I thought there were some around that did that already :/
Maybe I just read it somewhere, or completely imagined it.
At 3/29/09 06:08 PM, UnknownFury wrote:At 3/29/09 05:48 PM, Paranoia wrote:I thought there were some around that did that already :/
Maybe I just read it somewhere, or completely imagined it.
I've seen things that lower the power of the back light if there's a lot of darkness on the screen and puts it higher up when theres a lot of lighter stuff, but it looks really bad when its half and half.
How about you guys start making board games and flipbooks to save some electricity.
Hi there!
At 3/29/09 06:49 PM, jmtb02 wrote: How about you guys start making board games and flipbooks to save some electricity.
I still play board games, and make my own rules :P
Risk board + monopoly and starwars monopoly = win.
At 3/29/09 06:49 PM, jmtb02 wrote: How about you guys start making board games and flipbooks to save some electricity.
It's probably worse, what with packaging and postage and all :/
What if...
April's pregnancy and subsequent baby birth were all an elaborate April Fools joke. There are no pictures of the pregnant mother and her name IS April. Plus, the timing of the birth is mighty convenient...
Think about it.
At 3/29/09 08:42 PM, BoMToons wrote: What if...
April's pregnancy and subsequent baby birth were all an elaborate April Fools joke. There are no pictures of the pregnant mother and her name IS April. Plus, the timing of the birth is mighty convenient...
Think about it.
Hmm, You prove a good point. Just to be safe we should get our letter bombs ready now. :D
Some Game Ideas..
So I need some ideas. I have this small game (use arrow keys to move, jump on bombs to jump, go through hoops). However, the feels rather empty right now and I have no idea what to do with it.. halp D:
Board games
Paper is much more expensive. Multiply 300g per set with millions of users, how many trees is that? Plus fuel for transportation.
Tree huggers should promote electronics. :p
Black
Black sites are awesome. There should be more. Blackle is stupid, but I'd prefer it.
I think some phone screens only require energy to change pixels. At least, if you punched out one of those old Siemens phones, the image remained.
At 3/29/09 10:20 PM, Wurmy wrote: Some Game Ideas..
So I need some ideas. I have this small game (use arrow keys to move, jump on bombs to jump, go through hoops). However, the feels rather empty right now and I have no idea what to do with it.. halp D:
Cough, indestructotank, cough.
Cough, indestructotank, cough.
What a RIDICULOUS CONCEPT.
It'd NEVER WORK.
At 3/29/09 08:42 PM, BoMToons wrote: What if...
April's pregnancy and subsequent baby birth were all an elaborate April Fools joke. There are no pictures of the pregnant mother and her name IS April. Plus, the timing of the birth is mighty convenient...
I hear Tom isn't even married.
At 3/30/09 08:55 AM, Paranoia wrote:At 3/29/09 08:42 PM, BoMToons wrote: What if...I hear Tom isn't even married.
April's pregnancy and subsequent baby birth were all an elaborate April Fools joke. There are no pictures of the pregnant mother and her name IS April. Plus, the timing of the birth is mighty convenient...
I hear Tom isn't even real, and that we imagined him into existence.