At 9/13/08 06:05 AM, Xeptic wrote:At 9/13/08 04:55 AM, tommattox wrote:I think that's a bullshit argument. Apple's market share is around 4 to 7% (couldn't find an exact figure). That's millions and millions of computers. Of all the tens of thousands hackers there are in the world you would think there would be at least a few hundred interested in making some serious viruses for the Mac, if only to prove that Macs are not so safe after all.At 9/13/08 02:23 AM, Alpharius120 wrote: Yeah, I agree with you on that... I guess. But then again on the spectrum there's the massive plus of close to no crashes and no viruses.No-one bothers to create or find viruses for Macs. :P Anyways I've only ever used PC's. Don't know why.... I think I'm prejudiced or something.
The lack of viruses for the Mac is partially caused because there aren't a whole lot of them out there (relatively speaking), but I also think it's caused because they're generally safer (specifically designed for the hardware the OS is running on etc.) than your average household pc.
A large proportion of hackers nowadays are 11 year olds which just download virus programs which normally just hack the user. Almost all downloadable viruses that are found just by searching without bothering to type mac in are for PC's.
They probably are quite a bit safer however if someone really wanted to then it wouldn't be hard for them to create a mac virus. I'm guessing that for the most part PC users are a lot more suspectable because most young children will have not Macs but PC's.
Thats my theory anyways. X(