Gameplay footage. No animation
Original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CWzkXiCzRA
Original: http://www.stickempires.com/
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943530 (explicit)
NSFW rated M, should to be rated A
Clip of Spongebob episode
Modifying someone else's animation
At 8/12/24 11:20 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943550
Modifying someone else's animation
Original: https://youtu.be/4pnbchto6B0?feature=shared&t=44
me trying to tell the difference between these 2 screens
At 8/12/24 11:20 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943550
Modifying someone else's animation
Original: https://youtu.be/4pnbchto6B0?feature=shared&t=44
Got reuploaded
Duplicate of this but shorter and without audio, is this allowed?, feel free to ignore if it is
Please stop flagging this
read the author comments. It's for a competition & it's been approved by Tom.
If there's more of them submitted don't flag them either.
At 8/13/24 11:41 AM, gamejunkie wrote:Please stop flagging this
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943535
read the author comments. It's for a competition & it's been approved by Tom.
If there's more of them submitted don't flag them either.
I remember that contest. Wasn't that the one where people got mad about that AI music video winning? Or where people got mad and accused the band of exploiting free labour?
At 8/13/24 12:18 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 8/13/24 11:41 AM, gamejunkie wrote:Please stop flagging this
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943535
read the author comments. It's for a competition & it's been approved by Tom.
If there's more of them submitted don't flag them either.
I remember that contest. Wasn't that the one where people got mad about that AI music video winning? Or where people got mad and accused the band of exploiting free labour?
I found two articles about the AI video - one from AV Club and one from Entertainment Weekly.
Looks like the whole contest ended a while ago, and I was unaware.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943654 (explicit)
NSFW rated M, should to be rated A
Everything in this submission is stolen or modified from something else.
First 2 seconds is the opening of Tangled with an image of Koraidon slapped on top of.
Next several seconds are a slideshow of various fanart and footage from the Pokemon BW2 trailer and the Pokemon Masters EX mobile game.
Then we have figurine images of Nemona and Rosa slapped over various IRL footage and the Nagatoro anime.
Finally, we get copyrighted footage from Pokemon movies 1 and 3.
Edit consisting of still images + stock animated text. No original animation.
Just glitchin' about.
At 8/14/24 08:17 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943746
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/943526
Actually reuploaded by the same user ig
https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
At 8/14/24 08:17 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943746
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/943526
It was his own but reuploading blammed content is against the rules so it still stands
At 8/14/24 08:38 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
one of the first reviews i saw from them was calling the creator of an a-rated audio "gay, a pervert and a feminist" which raises red flags (whats wrong with being gay and a feminist???)
At 8/14/24 08:38 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older account
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
On the other hand, EGB jurisdiction only really covers submissions, not reviews, not threats, not lolcows. This is where you take it straight to the mods!
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
At 8/14/24 01:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
This confuses me, because in the Art Portal, fetish content is rated M. But in the Movie Portal, it's rated A? How does it work?
Just glitchin' about.
At 8/14/24 01:59 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 8/14/24 01:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
They deserve M.
This confuses me, because in the Art Portal, fetish content is rated M. But in the Movie Portal, it's rated A? How does it work?
You're comparing 2 different portals. Different parameters can apply. ...with that being said, see above.
...and, feel free to v0te whatever you like.
At 8/14/24 02:03 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/14/24 01:59 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:They deserve M.At 8/14/24 01:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
...damnit, I should've realised that before posting
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943792 .
thinking that this is a fetish ig
At 8/14/24 02:16 PM, eldonfachas2106 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943792 .
thinking that this is a fetish ig
Fetish confirmed. You win 1 ig. Correctly rated, tho. V0te.
At 8/14/24 02:17 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/14/24 02:16 PM, eldonfachas2106 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943792 .Fetish confirmed. You win 1 ig. Correctly rated, tho. V0te.
thinking that this is a fetish ig
I very nearly went and whistled that after seeing it here.
Will probably take a quick break from Barracks work on my birthday next Wednesday, and take a lengthier one at the start of September. Need some time to recharge.
At 8/14/24 02:22 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:I very nearly went and whistled that after seeing it here.
That's why we say (but get ignored) that one should always fully watch anything posted and not flag just cuz of a post.
Will probably take a quick break from Barracks work
Everyone needs it occasionally.
on my birthday next Wednesday,
Didn't you have one already? Like sometime last year??
and take a lengthier one at the start of September. Need some time to recharge.
At 8/14/24 02:30 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/14/24 02:22 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:Will probably take a quick break from Barracks workEveryone needs it occasionally.
on my birthday next Wednesday,
Didn't you have one already? Like sometime last year??
Yeah, my birthday's on the 21st August. Planning to go on a quick trip to Seahouses for the day.
and take a lengthier one at the start of September. Need some time to recharge.
Also going on the North Coast 500 at the start of September as well, so I'll likely be away from Newgrounds for a couple weeks.
At 8/14/24 12:49 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older account
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
What makes you think it's a possible ban evasion? Listen, I'm one of those people that had another account and in my case, it's that I forgot the password and don't have access to the email (Because it wasn't mine.) for a REALLY old account. Maybe this is why, but I'm just saying for myself and not for the guy that malds over 0 star reviews. Don't get why the OP posted the dude's account in the first place because barely any of his complaints relate to the EGB and most of it would be up to the Review mods, except for threatening because I got no idea on who to contact to.
At 8/14/24 12:11 PM, wolfatthedoor wrote:one of the first reviews i saw from them was calling the creator of an a-rated audio "gay, a pervert and a feminist" which raises red flags (whats wrong with being gay and a feminist???)
Well, if you looked like this:
Then of COURSE being gay and a feminist is bad, albeit this can be all said for right-wing politics. For people who don't get this, this is a man very well known for "FUCKING PRONOUNS.".
Now back to your regularly scheduled program.
It's Go!Animate/Plotagon/FlashThemes animation stuff. Basically shovelware. Though, someone check on this for any unlicensed copyrighted music in here, because the description tells me that there could be another possible violation.
so i had to cut this video short [sic] belive [sic] me this was could have been longer [sic]
videos every 3 weeks or a month [sic] not quitting this series anytime soon [sic] even if the rating is bad
music [sic] muted due to copyright [sic]
And then I realized in my search: "Oh shit, TWO of submissions do that."
This one uses Kanye West's "Stronger" at 5:43.
...And this one uses Pharrell Williams' "Despicable Me" at 3:23.
At 8/14/24 12:49 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 8/14/24 08:38 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older account
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
On the other hand, EGB jurisdiction only really covers submissions, not reviews, not threats, not lolcows. This is where you take it straight to the mods!
Do you know where I can discuss this with the mods? I posted it here instead because I didn't know
