At 8/14/24 08:17 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943746
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/943526
It was his own but reuploading blammed content is against the rules so it still stands
At 8/14/24 08:17 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943746
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/943526
It was his own but reuploading blammed content is against the rules so it still stands
At 8/14/24 08:38 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
one of the first reviews i saw from them was calling the creator of an a-rated audio "gay, a pervert and a feminist" which raises red flags (whats wrong with being gay and a feminist???)
At 8/14/24 08:38 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older account
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
On the other hand, EGB jurisdiction only really covers submissions, not reviews, not threats, not lolcows. This is where you take it straight to the mods!
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
At 8/14/24 01:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
This confuses me, because in the Art Portal, fetish content is rated M. But in the Movie Portal, it's rated A? How does it work?
At 8/14/24 01:59 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 8/14/24 01:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
They deserve M.
This confuses me, because in the Art Portal, fetish content is rated M. But in the Movie Portal, it's rated A? How does it work?
You're comparing 2 different portals. Different parameters can apply. ...with that being said, see above.
...and, feel free to v0te whatever you like.
At 8/14/24 02:03 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/14/24 01:59 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:They deserve M.At 8/14/24 01:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943779
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943778
Both fetish videos rated M
...damnit, I should've realised that before posting
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943792 .
thinking that this is a fetish ig
At 8/14/24 02:16 PM, eldonfachas2106 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943792 .
thinking that this is a fetish ig
Fetish confirmed. You win 1 ig. Correctly rated, tho. V0te.
At 8/14/24 02:17 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/14/24 02:16 PM, eldonfachas2106 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943792 .Fetish confirmed. You win 1 ig. Correctly rated, tho. V0te.
thinking that this is a fetish ig
I very nearly went and whistled that after seeing it here.
Will probably take a quick break from Barracks work on my birthday next Wednesday, and take a lengthier one at the start of September. Need some time to recharge.
At 8/14/24 02:22 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:I very nearly went and whistled that after seeing it here.
That's why we say (but get ignored) that one should always fully watch anything posted and not flag just cuz of a post.
Will probably take a quick break from Barracks work
Everyone needs it occasionally.
on my birthday next Wednesday,
Didn't you have one already? Like sometime last year??
and take a lengthier one at the start of September. Need some time to recharge.
At 8/14/24 02:30 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/14/24 02:22 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:Will probably take a quick break from Barracks workEveryone needs it occasionally.
on my birthday next Wednesday,
Didn't you have one already? Like sometime last year??
Yeah, my birthday's on the 21st August. Planning to go on a quick trip to Seahouses for the day.
and take a lengthier one at the start of September. Need some time to recharge.
Also going on the North Coast 500 at the start of September as well, so I'll likely be away from Newgrounds for a couple weeks.
At 8/14/24 12:49 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older account
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
What makes you think it's a possible ban evasion? Listen, I'm one of those people that had another account and in my case, it's that I forgot the password and don't have access to the email (Because it wasn't mine.) for a REALLY old account. Maybe this is why, but I'm just saying for myself and not for the guy that malds over 0 star reviews. Don't get why the OP posted the dude's account in the first place because barely any of his complaints relate to the EGB and most of it would be up to the Review mods, except for threatening because I got no idea on who to contact to.
At 8/14/24 12:11 PM, wolfatthedoor wrote:one of the first reviews i saw from them was calling the creator of an a-rated audio "gay, a pervert and a feminist" which raises red flags (whats wrong with being gay and a feminist???)
Well, if you looked like this:
Then of COURSE being gay and a feminist is bad, albeit this can be all said for right-wing politics. For people who don't get this, this is a man very well known for "FUCKING PRONOUNS.".
Now back to your regularly scheduled program.
It's Go!Animate/Plotagon/FlashThemes animation stuff. Basically shovelware. Though, someone check on this for any unlicensed copyrighted music in here, because the description tells me that there could be another possible violation.
so i had to cut this video short [sic] belive [sic] me this was could have been longer [sic]
videos every 3 weeks or a month [sic] not quitting this series anytime soon [sic] even if the rating is bad
music [sic] muted due to copyright [sic]
And then I realized in my search: "Oh shit, TWO of submissions do that."
This one uses Kanye West's "Stronger" at 5:43.
...And this one uses Pharrell Williams' "Despicable Me" at 3:23.
At 8/14/24 12:49 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 8/14/24 08:38 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older account
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
On the other hand, EGB jurisdiction only really covers submissions, not reviews, not threats, not lolcows. This is where you take it straight to the mods!
Do you know where I can discuss this with the mods? I posted it here instead because I didn't know
At 8/14/24 05:24 PM, Hoppio wrote:At 8/14/24 12:49 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 8/14/24 08:38 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://moonscott156revival.newgrounds.com/
do we need to keep an eye on this guy?
Has called someone's profile picture ugly as a reply to their review, threatens people who give his stuff low ratings, goes on nsfw posts just to give a low rating and occasionally insult the poster (I understand hating nsfw though)
After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older account
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
On the other hand, EGB jurisdiction only really covers submissions, not reviews, not threats, not lolcows. This is where you take it straight to the mods!
Do you know where I can discuss this with the mods? I posted it here instead because I didn't know
You can DM any moderator about it and they can pass it on, from what I understand.
This is probably stolen from Rayray, since this video has his watermark and is a sonic animation video, which is what he makes videos, but I can't find the original video anywhere, if anyone finds it I would be grateful
Rayray channel: https://youtube.com/@ray_ray478?si=r4hpR50Wkif0_y4c
At 8/14/24 03:41 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 8/14/24 12:49 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:After some digging, I'm certain this guy's under 18, if not under 13, not someone who should be looking at that stuff in the first place. I also discovered by removing "revival", a slightly older accountWhat makes you think it's a possible ban evasion? Listen, I'm one of those people that had another account and in my case, it's that I forgot the password and don't have access to the email (Because it wasn't mine.) for a REALLY old account. Maybe this is why, but I'm just saying for myself and not for the guy that malds over 0 star reviews. Don't get why the OP posted the dude's account in the first place because barely any of his complaints relate to the EGB and most of it would be up to the Review mods, except for threatening because I got no idea on who to contact to.
(possibly a coincidence, possibly ban evasion, I do not know!)
That could also be the case and it could all mean nothing. Unless a moderator can prove otherwise. I could be wrong.
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she
Gameplay footage. No animation
Uploader admits to reuploading someone else's work
Original creator: https://megajamesstudios.newgrounds.com/
At 8/15/24 12:24 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943941
Uploader admits to reuploading someone else's work
Original creator: https://megajamesstudios.newgrounds.com/
Good eye. I was just about to post that one.
Is the full episode "The end" from Eddsworld
Original
Stolen
https://youtu.be/TPCgKYJYi0I?si=r4N5UeuQB5kpPY6F
Original
--------------------------------------------------------------------
No animation
At 8/15/24 09:12 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/944004
Still image. No animation
It's clock day
At 8/16/24 07:08 AM, Simoes1000 wrote:At 8/15/24 09:12 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/944004It's clock day
Still image. No animation
Then why was this one unpublished?
At 8/15/24 03:19 PM, eldonfachas2106 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/943980
No animation - static image
From the description it sounds like he's trying to reupload another AnimatedJames animation. But this one doesn't even open anything.
At 8/16/24 12:31 PM, Chdonga wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/944111
From the description it sounds like he's trying to reupload another AnimatedJames animation. But this one doesn't even open anything.
Seemed to work. You just need to scale the NG Player wingow.
Flagging now!
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she