At 6/12/24 07:38 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:27 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.

Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.

That makes sense if that has been a thing in that past (I know you been on here a while, would love to hear stories of assholes getting mad btw) but it might save time for what is a pretty busy task. i havent seen users get tagged on here for a while.

I for example would not have cared at all to take down my post. And I don't think most people would not be more open to hearing the standards explained more. Maybe a quick peak at the profile to see if they are idk over level 6 and posted more than one thing?

tbh it's pretty daunting to come into the part of the forum (perhaps that is purposeful on the elite guards part) but i cant imagine frequent user would be so upset to have the reasoning explained to them. and for the unreasonable ones it might shut down their bs.

re: leniency. i see a lot of "live action" but i was planning on putting a live action element video on here that is heavy in motion graphics. i was encouraged by other long time users but the posts I have seen recently here are very much not considering motion graphics to be animation and heavily discouraging live action. While i cant see deleted posts, i would like a discussion about "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation."

You were recognized as a good known contributor. I am aware of your positive connection to this website in the past hence why I spoke up and asked someone to reach out (I was at work in the final minutes of break, sorry I didn't personally do so). However it seems a mod elected to remove the submission before that happened. Sorry. :(

As for the suggestion of debating "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation." Maybe that might be a good topic to start over in the animation section of the forum. Not throwing shade, but in my opinion we should probably keep this thread clear for its intended purpose. :)

At 6/12/24 07:38 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:27 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.

Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.

That makes sense if that has been a thing in that past (I know you been on here a while, would love to hear stories of assholes getting mad btw) but it might save time for what is a pretty busy task. i havent seen users get tagged on here for a while.

I for example would not have cared at all to take down my post. And I don't think most people would not be more open to hearing the standards explained more. Maybe a quick peak at the profile to see if they are idk over level 6 and posted more than one thing?

tbh it's pretty daunting to come into the part of the forum (perhaps that is purposeful on the elite guards part) but i cant imagine frequent user would be so upset to have the reasoning explained to them. and for the unreasonable ones it might shut down their bs.

re: leniency. i see a lot of "live action" but i was planning on putting a live action element video on here that is heavy in motion graphics. i was encouraged by other long time users but the posts I have seen recently here are very much not considering motion graphics to be animation and heavily discouraging live action. While i cant see deleted posts, i would like a discussion about "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation."

You were recognized as a good known contributor. I am aware of your positive connection to this website in the past hence why I spoke up and asked someone to reach out (I was at work in the final minutes of break, sorry I didn't personally do so). However it seems a mod elected to remove the submission before that happened. Sorry. :(

As for the suggestion of debating "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation." Maybe that might be a good topic to start over in the animation section of the forum. Not throwing shade, but in my opinion we should probably keep this thread clear for its intended purpose. :)

At 6/12/24 07:46 PM, tox wrote:

At 6/12/24 07:38 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:27 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.

Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.

That makes sense if that has been a thing in that past (I know you been on here a while, would love to hear stories of assholes getting mad btw) but it might save time for what is a pretty busy task. i havent seen users get tagged on here for a while.

I for example would not have cared at all to take down my post. And I don't think most people would not be more open to hearing the standards explained more. Maybe a quick peak at the profile to see if they are idk over level 6 and posted more than one thing?

tbh it's pretty daunting to come into the part of the forum (perhaps that is purposeful on the elite guards part) but i cant imagine frequent user would be so upset to have the reasoning explained to them. and for the unreasonable ones it might shut down their bs.

re: leniency. i see a lot of "live action" but i was planning on putting a live action element video on here that is heavy in motion graphics. i was encouraged by other long time users but the posts I have seen recently here are very much not considering motion graphics to be animation and heavily discouraging live action. While i cant see deleted posts, i would like a discussion about "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation."

You were recognized as a good known contributor. I am aware of your positive connection to this website in the past hence why I spoke up and asked someone to reach out (I was at work in the final minutes of break, sorry I didn't personally do so). However it seems a mod elected to remove the submission before that happened. Sorry. :(

As for the suggestion of debating "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation." Maybe that might be a good topic to start over in the animation section of the forum. Not throwing shade, but in my opinion we should probably keep this thread clear for its intended purpose. :)

well aren't you uppidy @PoultrygeistGame
do as much live action as you want as long as there is components of animation added to the piece so that you avoid the

If you want to try live action here, it must be a short film with legit production value and an animation component done in post production.

rule, after that you only have to worry about the production value being high enough for your regular user to rate you over a 2 star rating and it will pass

At 6/12/24 07:50 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 07:46 PM, tox wrote:

lol call me craig p uppityton

also that's good to know. i guess my question to that rule doesnt exactly seem evident by how many post on here are just tagged "live action" bam!

not any posts i have seen have someone quoting that rule in response to someone putting up a suggestion to blam a post for the crime of live action.

At 6/6/24 05:44 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933486[fetish]

What's y'all opinion on this? It's quite clearly fetish content, but it's only rated T. The uploader has made several similar videos in the past that are also rated T. They also have a few M and A-rated videos, but from the few I've seen they go to more extreme lengths than the T rated ones. Should any of this be re-rated? Idk what the exact policy for fetish content is.

At 6/13/24 07:16 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/6/24 05:44 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933486[fetish]

What's y'all opinion on this? It's quite clearly fetish content, but it's only rated T. The uploader has made several similar videos in the past that are also rated T. They also have a few M and A-rated videos, but from the few I've seen they go to more extreme lengths than the T rated ones. Should any of this be re-rated? Idk what the exact policy for fetish content is.

<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934469
anthroblu's done it again - this time, its been rated E

At 6/13/24 07:16 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/6/24 05:44 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933486[fetish]

What's y'all opinion on this? It's quite clearly fetish content, but it's only rated T. The uploader has made several similar videos in the past that are also rated T. They also have a few M and A-rated videos, but from the few I've seen they go to more extreme lengths than the T rated ones. Should any of this be re-rated? Idk what the exact policy for fetish content is.

<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934469
anthroblu's done it again - this time, its been rated E

At 6/13/24 12:10 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/13/24 11:06 AM, freaks-heart wrote:Worth noting, the creator of the animation traced from drawinfunky's art on Deviantart. Original: https://www.deviantart.com/drawinfunky/art/Pumped-Bun-976020546

Well the thing that IS traced is the head itself, though <fetish>this isn't the first case.
Now you bring it up, fucker did trace shit. <fetish>This one here? Zorua, oh my bad, ZOURA's head is traced. But how does this help at all?

At 6/13/24 12:30 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:

At 6/13/24 12:10 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/13/24 11:06 AM, freaks-heart wrote:Worth noting, the creator of the animation traced from drawinfunky's art on Deviantart. Original: https://www.deviantart.com/drawinfunky/art/Pumped-Bun-976020546

Well the thing that IS traced is the head itself, though <fetish>this isn't the first case.
Now you bring it up, fucker did trace shit. <fetish>This one here? Zorua, oh my bad, ZOURA's head is traced. But how does this help at all?

The only relevant question: Is tracing against Movie Guidelines?

At 6/13/24 12:10 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/13/24 11:06 AM, freaks-heart wrote:Worth noting, the creator of the animation traced from drawinfunky's art on Deviantart. Original: https://www.deviantart.com/drawinfunky/art/Pumped-Bun-976020546

Well the thing that IS traced is the head itself, though <fetish>this isn't the first case.
Now you bring it up, fucker did trace shit. <fetish>This one here? Zorua, oh my bad, ZOURA's head is traced. But how does this help at all?

At 6/12/24 11:12 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 10:46 AM, ElRinconDeRodri wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934360
I hate this type of content, most of which are wanking children

I feel like there's some merit to it, but I want somebody to check whether or not the submission has an underage model. While Bmaster is not a first offender, considering Mermaid Factory is a thing I knew and they're taken down, except not for same reason, it's due to shovelware, I feel like the submission is pushing TOO MUCH on the gray area when it comes to underage models and frankly something like a loli or shota suddenly transforming into an adult just makes me disgusted.

At 6/12/24 10:58 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:
This thread's about rule-breaking content, not merely fucked-up content.

But I can say that to literally any submission that contains abusive content, sexualized underage models content, or anything remotely bestiality related. Sure, we have a noob who doesn't understand what the hell is the Board for and probably doesn't understand what are the Movie guidelines, but it doesn't necessarily mean it should be thrown out. Ultimately it's on the Movie moderators to see if I'm on the ball or not.

At 6/13/24 06:23 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/13/24 04:41 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:A quick update on this situation:
Bmaster DMed me asking why it was removed - I told him what I know, and recommended he ask in this thread if he wants answers.
If he turns up here, blame me.

Same. Though if I had to ask, do portal mods talk to other portal mods? Because seeing Pingu as the mod he talks to about the Mermaid Factory YCHs is VERY strange considering that Pingu isn't a mod in any portal he posts in, so exactly why a Forum and Audio moderator if his submissions are mainly within the scope of the Game Portal, the Movie Portal, and also the Art portal to be generous to my memory of what I whistle in NG? The only answer I CAN think of is that they do and Pingu's just a middle man in this situation, that is we're assuming that he didn't read the NG wiki to know what mods he probably should've contacted first. I mean, Exedor was in my PMs about me whistling the wrong reviews and he's a mod in almost everything, aside from the forums of course, so I guess there's a counter to that, but it doesn't hurt to ask anyway.

At 6/13/24 09:38 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/13/24 09:33 PM, BmasterAD wrote:

At 6/13/24 06:23 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/13/24 04:41 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:A quick update on this situation:
Bmaster DMed me asking why it was removed - I told him what I know, and recommended he ask in this thread if he wants answers.
If he turns up here, blame me.

Same. Though if I had to ask, do portal mods talk to other portal mods? Because seeing Pingu as the mod he talks to about the Mermaid Factory YCHs is VERY strange considering that Pingu isn't a mod in any portal he posts in, so exactly why a Forum and Audio moderator if his submissions are mainly within the scope of the Game Portal, the Movie Portal, and also the Art portal to be generous to my memory of what I whistle in NG? The only answer I CAN think of is that they do and Pingu's just a middle man in this situation, that is we're assuming that he didn't read the NG wiki to know what mods he probably should've contacted first. I mean, Exedor was in my PMs about me whistling the wrong reviews and he's a mod in almost everything, aside from the forums of course, so I guess there's a counter to that, but it doesn't hurt to ask anyway.

I thought only mods could talk her based on the first post in the forum saying only members can post, but everyone can post, so I was confused by that.

In the case of the Mermaid factory, Exedor Dmed me at the time asking me to stop posting the mermaid factory, but didn't remove them (I removed them) Pingu was in the chat and gave a second opinion when Exedor asked if he thought the Mermaid factory was Shovelware, so I messaged them at the time since they were on when Exedor wasn't.

At the time of that event Exedor had Dmed me in the middle of the night and I was glad to catch that and cancel the following mornings post that was scheduled as it was requested not to be posted.

In the case of the Mii, I'll respect its removal, but I wish I was Dmed about its removal so that I would know in the future any Default body type Mii would be considered Loli. Based on the description given by @Bickerysebastian any and every female Mii would fall under the "Loli" title. I personally didn't see my Mii as a loli as that is just the character style, I didn't intend said Mii of above average Height to be seen as a loli. BUT AGAIN I respect its removal, I don't EVER mean to break rules. I don't feel like my first "offence" was't an offence it was a warning, that I remedied by removing the content swiftly myself! I follow rules as best I can!

As it stands I will no longer post Default body types of Miis knowing this, and only more exaggerated adult body proportions.

I have honestly never seen the Miis as children nor adults, but just pawns in the games they were meant to play.

At 6/13/24 06:23 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/13/24 04:41 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:A quick update on this situation:
Bmaster DMed me asking why it was removed - I told him what I know, and recommended he ask in this thread if he wants answers.
If he turns up here, blame me.

Same. Though if I had to ask, do portal mods talk to other portal mods? Because seeing Pingu as the mod he talks to about the Mermaid Factory YCHs is VERY strange considering that Pingu isn't a mod in any portal he posts in, so exactly why a Forum and Audio moderator if his submissions are mainly within the scope of the Game Portal, the Movie Portal, and also the Art portal to be generous to my memory of what I whistle in NG? The only answer I CAN think of is that they do and Pingu's just a middle man in this situation, that is we're assuming that he didn't read the NG wiki to know what mods he probably should've contacted first. I mean, Exedor was in my PMs about me whistling the wrong reviews and he's a mod in almost everything, aside from the forums of course, so I guess there's a counter to that, but it doesn't hurt to ask anyway.

At 6/14/24 05:58 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:

At 6/14/24 05:51 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934642
Geometry Dash gameplay footage

https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934643
Reupload of "HELL NAW": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83UF7k08Jck

Note: Don't put "you got trolled" in the description where you can see it. You're not fooling anyone.