<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934797
On the one hand, this is Duke Nukem 3D gameplay footage, on the other hand, this is explicitly showing off a sprite mod. Personally leaning towards not reporting on that front, but I'd like a second opinion.
What I am sure on is this being misrated - the showcase has Rouge explicitly showing her tits, despite not being A-rated (its rated M as of this writing)
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 6/15/24 09:10 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934797
On the one hand, this is Duke Nukem 3D gameplay footage, on the other hand, this is explicitly showing off a sprite mod. Personally leaning towards not reporting on that front, but I'd like a second opinion.
What I am sure on is this being misrated - the showcase has Rouge explicitly showing her tits, despite not being A-rated (its rated M as of this writing)
I removed it.
It's a very short gameplay recording, and a mod, and just showing off a sprite. If he wants to show off sprites, we have the proper category for that in the Art portal. He could even include a short video as part of the submission there.
At 6/15/24 11:02 AM, guthrie wrote:At 6/15/24 09:10 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934797
On the one hand, this is Duke Nukem 3D gameplay footage, on the other hand, this is explicitly showing off a sprite mod. Personally leaning towards not reporting on that front, but I'd like a second opinion.
What I am sure on is this being misrated - the showcase has Rouge explicitly showing her tits, despite not being A-rated (its rated M as of this writing)
I removed it.
It's a very short gameplay recording, and a mod, and just showing off a sprite. If he wants to show off sprites, we have the proper category for that in the Art portal. He could even include a short video as part of the submission there.
That makes perfect sense. Thanks for the explanation.
Anyways:
<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934859
No animation - live-action (also probably stolen)
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/15/24 04:04 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934875
No content - game returns "404 Not Found"
Looks like it's working fine for me.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 6/15/24 05:54 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934878
Shovelware - made with GoAnimate
ah fuck I gave this 2 stars I didn't know
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/15/24 05:55 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/15/24 05:54 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934878
Shovelware - made with GoAnimate
ah fuck I gave this 2 stars I didn't know
You can just change the rating if you want.
At 6/15/24 05:55 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/15/24 05:54 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934878
Shovelware - made with GoAnimate
ah fuck I gave this 2 stars I didn't know
I immediately identified it as GoAnimate just by looking at the guy's face - I can't put my finger on why, but it just had that "Family Guy knockoff" look which made it obvious.
Thinking about it further, you could probably develop an image recognition algorithm to spot GoAnimate videos with relative ease. Considering how, shall we say, "unique" the GoAnimate style is, the risk of false positives should be near-zero, too.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 6/15/24 05:56 PM, Madmazel wrote:At 6/15/24 05:55 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/15/24 05:54 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934878
Shovelware - made with GoAnimate
ah fuck I gave this 2 stars I didn't know
You can just change the rating if you want.
Been that way since 2018, as a matter of fact.
I'll never understand why NG had the old "vote 0-5, review 0-10" system for so long - the 2018 system seems like the obvious thing to do.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 6/15/24 04:04 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934875
No content - game returns "404 Not Found"
The fuck you mean no content?
Nuegronds
At 6/15/24 06:25 PM, Hoppio wrote:At 6/15/24 04:04 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934875
No content - game returns "404 Not Found"
The fuck you mean no content?
The first time around I checked out the game, I got a 404 Not Found error.
Looking back, my dumb ass should have clearly either waited to see if it got fixed or PMed the dev about the issue.
he/they - pretty cool guy
Compilation of a lot of random crap. No original animation
No animation
At 6/16/24 12:19 AM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934925
Animated Loop
what rule does this violate pipe
I thought there was a rule about Loops
At 6/16/24 12:56 AM, tox wrote:At 6/16/24 12:19 AM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934925
Animated Loop
what rule does this violate pipe
At 6/16/24 01:02 AM, AlexToolStudio wrote:I thought there was a rule about LoopsAt 6/16/24 12:56 AM, tox wrote:At 6/16/24 12:19 AM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934925
Animated Loop
what rule does this violate pipe
Not that I recall of. The submission seems decent enough that it'll pass easily. Also helps that this isn't some first-off post with no description.
In terms of loops, mostly poorly made Madness shooting loops end up getting blammed (when the page turns into "Eulogy for X"), and slap-together 1-2 second loops with no audio/description get blammed quickly.
I'd say this one will pass. It's not breaking any rules and it has enough quality to pass easily.
Duplicate uploads, one with audio, one without.
Just glitchin' about.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934954 (NSFW)
Sexual content involving an underage animated character
ElRandomGMD (aka RandomToons)
At 6/14/24 03:37 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934539
Live-action commentary; no animation
Also, a question: are we still reporting videos like this and others (still image, gameplay, music visualisers, etc.) as spam? I noticed the description for the "Spam" reporting option recently changed to specifically mention "Promoting shady links, marketing schemes, blatant ad[s]", and so I'm now wondering if the spam reporting option is only meant to be used for those things.
Does anyone have an answer to this question? It would be much appreciated.
Just glitchin' about.
I'm seeing a huge intake of low quality Stencyl games getting uploaded that are using similar formats and sprites. I think these were created as part of some school assignment using tutorial assets. The Monkey University one is using the same sprite as the Stencyl Monkey Run.
At 6/16/24 01:23 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934963
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934858
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934973
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934977
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934994
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934964
I'm seeing a huge intake of low quality Stencyl games getting uploaded that are using similar formats and sprites. I think these were created as part of some school assignment using tutorial assets. The Monkey University one is using the same sprite as the Stencyl Monkey Run.
I was curious about this too, so I searched "ISU Cauayan" on Google and found a university in the Philippines. So you are most likely correct. I hope their grades won't be affected if their schoolwork gets blammed... :(
At 6/16/24 12:39 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/14/24 03:37 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934539
Live-action commentary; no animation
Also, a question: are we still reporting videos like this and others (still image, gameplay, music visualisers, etc.) as spam? I noticed the description for the "Spam" reporting option recently changed to specifically mention "Promoting shady links, marketing schemes, blatant ad[s]", and so I'm now wondering if the spam reporting option is only meant to be used for those things.
Does anyone have an answer to this question? It would be much appreciated.
The flagging categories are much less important than the notes you write when you submit the flag. Unless it's really obvious, a detailed explanation of why the submission is rule-breaking makes our jobs much easier.
At 6/16/24 04:03 PM, guthrie wrote:At 6/16/24 12:39 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/14/24 03:37 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934539
Live-action commentary; no animation
Also, a question: are we still reporting videos like this and others (still image, gameplay, music visualisers, etc.) as spam? I noticed the description for the "Spam" reporting option recently changed to specifically mention "Promoting shady links, marketing schemes, blatant ad[s]", and so I'm now wondering if the spam reporting option is only meant to be used for those things.
Does anyone have an answer to this question? It would be much appreciated.
The flagging categories are much less important than the notes you write when you submit the flag. Unless it's really obvious, a detailed explanation of why the submission is rule-breaking makes our jobs much easier.
So I should keep on reporting things like blank screens, live-action footage, etc? Sometimes it isn't clear what should be reported vs what should be blammed.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/16/24 04:49 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/16/24 04:03 PM, guthrie wrote:At 6/16/24 12:39 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/14/24 03:37 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934539
Live-action commentary; no animation
Also, a question: are we still reporting videos like this and others (still image, gameplay, music visualisers, etc.) as spam? I noticed the description for the "Spam" reporting option recently changed to specifically mention "Promoting shady links, marketing schemes, blatant ad[s]", and so I'm now wondering if the spam reporting option is only meant to be used for those things.
Does anyone have an answer to this question? It would be much appreciated.
The flagging categories are much less important than the notes you write when you submit the flag. Unless it's really obvious, a detailed explanation of why the submission is rule-breaking makes our jobs much easier.
So I should keep on reporting things like blank screens, live-action footage, etc? Sometimes it isn't clear what should be reported vs what should be blammed.
I'd still keep reporting - flagworthy's flagworthy, whether its an easy blam or a Daily Award contender.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 6/16/24 04:00 PM, Zfert wrote:At 6/16/24 01:23 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934963
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934858
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934973
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934977
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934994
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934964
I'm seeing a huge intake of low quality Stencyl games getting uploaded that are using similar formats and sprites. I think these were created as part of some school assignment using tutorial assets. The Monkey University one is using the same sprite as the Stencyl Monkey Run.
I was curious about this too, so I searched "ISU Cauayan" on Google and found a university in the Philippines. So you are most likely correct. I hope their grades won't be affected if their schoolwork gets blammed... :(
If they're being made for a school assignment, I strongly doubt the teacher's gonna hold their work getting blammed here against the submitter.
The teacher probably doesn't even know Newgrounds exists :P
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 6/16/24 04:51 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/16/24 04:49 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:I'd still keep reporting - flagworthy's flagworthy, whether its an easy blam or a Daily Award contender.At 6/16/24 04:03 PM, guthrie wrote:At 6/16/24 12:39 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/14/24 03:37 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934539
Live-action commentary; no animation
Also, a question: are we still reporting videos like this and others (still image, gameplay, music visualisers, etc.) as spam? I noticed the description for the "Spam" reporting option recently changed to specifically mention "Promoting shady links, marketing schemes, blatant ad[s]", and so I'm now wondering if the spam reporting option is only meant to be used for those things.
Does anyone have an answer to this question? It would be much appreciated.
The flagging categories are much less important than the notes you write when you submit the flag. Unless it's really obvious, a detailed explanation of why the submission is rule-breaking makes our jobs much easier.
So I should keep on reporting things like blank screens, live-action footage, etc? Sometimes it isn't clear what should be reported vs what should be blammed.
Yeah, that makes sense.
As for the reporting vs blamming aspect, my understanding is that if it doesn't *technically* break any rules, but it's still a piece of crap, then you blam. But sometimes, it really isn't clear what you should do. In those cases, would you lean more towards flagging, blamming, or posting the submission here and waiting for a consensus?
Just glitchin' about.
