HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
Live action video over that one screen from Metal Gear Solid. No animation.
Just glitchin' about.
Just glitchin' about.
Recording of Paint 3D timeline; no animation
Speedpaint.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/11/24 08:20 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934222
AI-generated
Oh wow, some of those images actually looked pretty realistic. But watching it back now, yeah I'm starting to see signs of AI shenanigans as well. I'd better keep a closer eye out for these things.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/11/24 08:25 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/11/24 08:20 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934222
AI-generated
Oh wow, some of those images actually looked pretty realistic. But watching it back now, yeah I'm starting to see signs of AI shenanigans as well. I'd better keep a closer eye out for these things.
Just remember that AI stuff is allowed if it is used as a complementary tool
Just glitchin' about.
Recordings of still drawings mixed with gameplay footage; no animation
Just glitchin' about.
Slowed/reverb rip of "Senpai Erect (Kawai Sprite Remix)":
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934270 (NSFW)
Gameplay footage
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/767525 (NSFW)
Not original author, as admitted by submitter
(source unknown, suspected lost)
EDIT: Downloaded and saved both SWFs before they get deleted - will try to work out source later
(its 1:16 AM where I live, as of this writing)
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/11/24 02:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/11/24 02:18 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934258
Still image; no animation
Aw man, this is the guy from troma. Someone want to give him a poke?
Yea. Ive seen stuff on here with less animation. I always thought the barracks was for people who were trying to hurt the site. I'm an active, social, and responsive user who uploaded pencil animation the same day. Mighta been nice to just get a dm vs blam. Nice to meet you @glitchbuddy no hard feelings :)
edit: (also thanks for the heads up @yendorng :) )
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 10:46 AM, ElRinconDeRodri wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934360
I hate this type of content, most of which are wanking children
This thread's about rule-breaking content, not merely fucked-up content.
Anyways,
No animation - still image with text underneath
At 6/12/24 10:46 AM, ElRinconDeRodri wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934360
I hate this type of content, most of which are wanking children
I feel like there's some merit to it, but I want somebody to check whether or not the submission has an underage model. While Bmaster is not a first offender, considering Mermaid Factory is a thing I knew and they're taken down, except not for same reason, it's due to shovelware, I feel like the submission is pushing TOO MUCH on the gray area when it comes to underage models and frankly something like a loli or shota suddenly transforming into an adult just makes me disgusted.
At 6/12/24 10:58 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:This thread's about rule-breaking content, not merely fucked-up content.
But I can say that to literally any submission that contains abusive content, sexualized underage models content, or anything remotely bestiality related. Sure, we have a noob who doesn't understand what the hell is the Board for and probably doesn't understand what are the Movie guidelines, but it doesn't necessarily mean it should be thrown out. Ultimately it's on the Movie moderators to see if I'm on the ball or not.
At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/11/24 02:21 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934253
Recordings of still drawings mixed with gameplay footage; no animation
i think another instance of it being appropriate to tag artist @kingdenda5th they have a lot of more involved character animation. If only "character animation"
is animation, then that is an easy enough line to draw but it excludes already popular ways on making content on the site (e.g. meme content is almost never character animated). I think that if motion graphics aren't animation (which i'd say they are), the stills are not filmed they are photos manipulated in after effects aka animated. I want to tag some of the more active people in discussion elsewhere on the forum where longtime users are encouraging more puppetry and motion graphics while on here it seems like using elements and motion graphics are getting flagged. there may be a disconnect between the user base and the guards on where the lines of "animation" are.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
lol @exedor am i wrong?
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.
At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.
So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?
Again trying to have civil discourse here.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.
So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?
Again trying to have civil discourse here.
because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.
I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.
It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.
All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.
So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?
Again trying to have civil discourse here.
because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.
I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.
It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.
All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.
I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.
At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.
So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?
Again trying to have civil discourse here.
because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.
I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.
It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.
All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.
V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.
So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?
Again trying to have civil discourse here.
because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.
I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.
It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.
All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.
V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.
Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.
That makes sense if that has been a thing in that past (I know you been on here a while, would love to hear stories of assholes getting mad btw) but it might save time for what is a pretty busy task. i havent seen users get tagged on here for a while.
I for example would not have cared at all to take down my post. And I don't think most people would not be more open to hearing the standards explained more. Maybe a quick peak at the profile to see if they are idk over level 6 and posted more than one thing?
tbh it's pretty daunting to come into the part of the forum (perhaps that is purposeful on the elite guards part) but i cant imagine frequent user would be so upset to have the reasoning explained to them. and for the unreasonable ones it might shut down their bs.
re: leniency. i see a lot of "live action" but i was planning on putting a live action element video on here that is heavy in motion graphics. i was encouraged by other long time users but the posts I have seen recently here are very much not considering motion graphics to be animation and heavily discouraging live action. While i cant see deleted posts, i would like a discussion about "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation."
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
