https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935019[NSFW]
Rated M despite visible genitals. Should be rated A.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935019[NSFW]
Rated M despite visible genitals. Should be rated A.
At 6/16/24 04:59 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935019[NSFW]
Rated M despite visible genitals. Should be rated A.
Flagged, I don't know what happens to those people who make porn nowadays?
They only love Furrys, Femboys and Sex, what's wrong with these people, because not only do they do something great, like a Dragon Ball style fight, they can do it, look at me I don't upload porn and I uploaded an animation with action!
At 6/16/24 04:53 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/16/24 04:00 PM, Zfert wrote:If they're being made for a school assignment, I strongly doubt the teacher's gonna hold their work getting blammed here against the submitter.At 6/16/24 01:23 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934963
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934858
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934973
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934977
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934994
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934964
I'm seeing a huge intake of low quality Stencyl games getting uploaded that are using similar formats and sprites. I think these were created as part of some school assignment using tutorial assets. The Monkey University one is using the same sprite as the Stencyl Monkey Run.
I was curious about this too, so I searched "ISU Cauayan" on Google and found a university in the Philippines. So you are most likely correct. I hope their grades won't be affected if their schoolwork gets blammed... :(
The teacher probably doesn't even know Newgrounds exists :P
You would be surprised how often things like this are part of the requirements for an assignment! I’ve heard nightmare stories from both industry folk and students about professors requiring their class to email big studios with beginner work or ask for feedback and advice. My uni had us display our work at local expos, thankfully sparing us from the internet seeing our freshman and sophomore projects lol
At 6/16/24 05:04 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:At 6/16/24 04:59 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935019[NSFW]Flagged, I don't know what happens to those people who make porn nowadays?
Rated M despite visible genitals. Should be rated A.
They only love Furrys, Femboys and Sex, what's wrong with these people, because not only do they do something great, like a Dragon Ball style fight, they can do it, look at me I don't upload porn and I uploaded an animation with action!
...what? What!?
The submitter has taken a clip from the Eddsworld video "Spares" (https://youtu.be/Ie91HF0L9dA, 1:13-1:18) and overlaid their own text onto it. I'm counting this one as stolen.
At 6/16/24 01:23 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934963
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934858
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934973
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934977
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934994
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934964
I'm seeing a huge intake of low quality Stencyl games getting uploaded that are using similar formats and sprites. I think these were created as part of some school assignment using tutorial assets. The Monkey University one is using the same sprite as the Stencyl Monkey Run.
at least it will be easy for us to go back and flag items that came through like this
I'm sure that they can all be flagged under, user not owning the sprites that they are using
so, that leaves the question, does the mod/admin team want to action these games or let them through?
Gameplay footage; no animation
Music visualiser; no animation
Still images with transition effects; no animation
At 6/16/24 05:34 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/16/24 05:04 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:...what? What!?At 6/16/24 04:59 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935019[NSFW]Flagged, I don't know what happens to those people who make porn nowadays?
Rated M despite visible genitals. Should be rated A.
They only love Furrys, Femboys and Sex, what's wrong with these people, because not only do they do something great, like a Dragon Ball style fight, they can do it, look at me I don't upload porn and I uploaded an animation with action!
no *places a hand on your shoulder in a firm but reassuring manner* they have a point.
damn portal has been filled with furry hentai every hour, almost on the hour. It’s unreal. Tom needs to start taxing these motherfuckers. Is the newgrounds database infinite or something?! Oh, and it’s ALWAYS gay natured too. Like dude. The amount of cocks and balls in an afternoon? shit can’t be healthy for my psyche. and I used to moderate a hentai site for crying out loud!
If I could? I’d whistle em all to hell and back. But I can’t. so I’ll internally harbor the pain. (besides this one post)
Using Powerpoint or whatever you kids use nowaday
At 6/16/24 04:49 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/16/24 04:03 PM, guthrie wrote:At 6/16/24 12:39 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/14/24 03:37 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934539
Live-action commentary; no animation
Also, a question: are we still reporting videos like this and others (still image, gameplay, music visualisers, etc.) as spam? I noticed the description for the "Spam" reporting option recently changed to specifically mention "Promoting shady links, marketing schemes, blatant ad[s]", and so I'm now wondering if the spam reporting option is only meant to be used for those things.
Does anyone have an answer to this question? It would be much appreciated.
The flagging categories are much less important than the notes you write when you submit the flag. Unless it's really obvious, a detailed explanation of why the submission is rule-breaking makes our jobs much easier.
So I should keep on reporting things like blank screens, live-action footage, etc? Sometimes it isn't clear what should be reported vs what should be blammed.
I do my best to leave the obvious garbage submissions up so they will blam. This has a few effects that removing through the mod process doesn't:
That's my thought process, anyway.
At 6/17/24 10:50 AM, guthrie wrote:[cut for length]
That's my thought process, anyway.
Kinda wished submissions being removed by a mod also awarded you a blam point. It'd make them far less rare.
At 6/17/24 10:57 AM, Madmazel wrote:At 6/17/24 10:50 AM, guthrie wrote:[cut for length]
That's my thought process, anyway.
Kinda wished submissions being removed by a mod also awarded you a blam point. It'd make them far less rare.
Same here.
One person quoting me in agreement and another reacting with a heart eyes emoji... i am the voice of the silent majority
At 6/17/24 10:57 AM, Madmazel wrote:At 6/17/24 10:50 AM, guthrie wrote:[cut for length]
That's my thought process, anyway.
Kinda wished submissions being removed by a mod also awarded you a blam point. It'd make them far less rare.
Maybe whistle points should be made public in that case? I don't know if that would encourage others to mass-report submissions though...
At 6/17/24 10:57 AM, Madmazel wrote:At 6/17/24 10:50 AM, guthrie wrote:[cut for length]
That's my thought process, anyway.
Kinda wished submissions being removed by a mod also awarded you a blam point. It'd make them far less rare.
I would rather have people vote fairly on crappy submissions
Also consider the huge amount of flags that would result from stat chasers having a new way to game the system.
At 6/17/24 01:40 PM, guthrie wrote:At 6/17/24 10:57 AM, Madmazel wrote:At 6/17/24 10:50 AM, guthrie wrote:[cut for length]
That's my thought process, anyway.
Kinda wished submissions being removed by a mod also awarded you a blam point. It'd make them far less rare.
I would rather have people vote fairly on crappy submissions
I'm not talking about crappy submissions, I'm talking about submissions that break the rules.
Also consider the huge amount of flags that would result from stat chasers having a new way to game the system.
If people flag submissions that don't break the rules it's just gonna cost them whistle points.
No animation - live-action
(My instincts are saying this is also stolen, but I'm not 100% sure)
Stolen from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlouAA8mRZo, no original animation.
A civilian interested in keeping the portal a safer place, anything I can do to help sir?
I'm way late to the party aren't I?
At 6/18/24 05:08 AM, Superboi68 wrote:A civilian interested in keeping the portal a safer place, anything I can do to help sir?
I'm way late to the party aren't I?
It's never too late to help keep the portal a safer place; I myself only joined at the beginning of the month.
Looking at your profile, it seems you don't have a lot of experience, but more importantly, you have 0 B/P points. While it's not technically the sole focus of the EGB, a big part of it revolves around judging new games and movies, rating them fairly, and reporting any that break the rules.
The ROTC, which is sort of the EGB's beginner program, requires at least 400 B/P points (Portal Security rank) and a normal whistle to join, so you have a bit of a way to go. That's completely fine, though; as I said at the beginning, it's never too late to start judging!
If you scroll down to the bottom of Newgrounds, you'll notice two links under "Extra, Extra!": Game Judging, and Movie Judging. Clicking on one of those will give you a list of all the entries that are currently under judgement in that specific category, where you can watch/play through and rate as many entries as you want (you don't have to do them all).
Rating a submission 1.5 or below will contribute towards blamming it, while rating a submission 2 or above will contribute towards saving it. Once a submission has been blammed/saved, then depending on whether you chose to contribute towards blamming/saving it, you will receive a blam/save point, which can be seen on your profile. Be sure to rate submissions fairly though, and don't try to artificially increase your blam/save points, because that's not what the EGB is about!
But that's not all; if you spot a submission that breaks the rules, then you gotta flag it! Click the flag button located to the top right of the submission, then click the category that most closely matches the rule it's breaking and explain why in the text box provided. Doing so successfully will give you whistle points (an invisible stat), enough of which will increase the whistle level seen on your profile. Only flag submissions if you're sure they break the rules!
This is what we do here at the EGB, and you don't have to be a member to post bad submissions into the thread. For more information, take a look at the different pages on the EGB website, and be sure to read through our code of conduct. You're always welcome to ask questions in the thread if you have any!
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935203 (NSFW)
Slideshow of a webcomic. No animation
No animation
No animation - slideshow
No animation - live-action
Reupload of removed submission with no noticeable changes.
Where the original submission?
At 6/18/24 11:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935235
Reupload of removed submission with no noticeable changes.
At 6/18/24 12:54 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:Where the original submission?At 6/18/24 11:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935235
Reupload of removed submission with no noticeable changes.
Ah shit I forgot, thanks for reminding me.
Original submission:
Reupload of blammed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/935123
At 6/18/24 01:28 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/935236
Reupload of blammed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/935123
Does a submission only get a "rip" page if it's been blammed, not if it's been removed by a mod?