At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.

Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.

At 6/12/24 07:38 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:27 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.

Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.

That makes sense if that has been a thing in that past (I know you been on here a while, would love to hear stories of assholes getting mad btw) but it might save time for what is a pretty busy task. i havent seen users get tagged on here for a while.

I for example would not have cared at all to take down my post. And I don't think most people would not be more open to hearing the standards explained more. Maybe a quick peak at the profile to see if they are idk over level 6 and posted more than one thing?

tbh it's pretty daunting to come into the part of the forum (perhaps that is purposeful on the elite guards part) but i cant imagine frequent user would be so upset to have the reasoning explained to them. and for the unreasonable ones it might shut down their bs.

re: leniency. i see a lot of "live action" but i was planning on putting a live action element video on here that is heavy in motion graphics. i was encouraged by other long time users but the posts I have seen recently here are very much not considering motion graphics to be animation and heavily discouraging live action. While i cant see deleted posts, i would like a discussion about "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation."

You were recognized as a good known contributor. I am aware of your positive connection to this website in the past hence why I spoke up and asked someone to reach out (I was at work in the final minutes of break, sorry I didn't personally do so). However it seems a mod elected to remove the submission before that happened. Sorry. :(

As for the suggestion of debating "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation." Maybe that might be a good topic to start over in the animation section of the forum. Not throwing shade, but in my opinion we should probably keep this thread clear for its intended purpose. :)

At 6/12/24 07:38 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:27 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.

Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.

That makes sense if that has been a thing in that past (I know you been on here a while, would love to hear stories of assholes getting mad btw) but it might save time for what is a pretty busy task. i havent seen users get tagged on here for a while.

I for example would not have cared at all to take down my post. And I don't think most people would not be more open to hearing the standards explained more. Maybe a quick peak at the profile to see if they are idk over level 6 and posted more than one thing?

tbh it's pretty daunting to come into the part of the forum (perhaps that is purposeful on the elite guards part) but i cant imagine frequent user would be so upset to have the reasoning explained to them. and for the unreasonable ones it might shut down their bs.

re: leniency. i see a lot of "live action" but i was planning on putting a live action element video on here that is heavy in motion graphics. i was encouraged by other long time users but the posts I have seen recently here are very much not considering motion graphics to be animation and heavily discouraging live action. While i cant see deleted posts, i would like a discussion about "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation."

You were recognized as a good known contributor. I am aware of your positive connection to this website in the past hence why I spoke up and asked someone to reach out (I was at work in the final minutes of break, sorry I didn't personally do so). However it seems a mod elected to remove the submission before that happened. Sorry. :(

As for the suggestion of debating "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation." Maybe that might be a good topic to start over in the animation section of the forum. Not throwing shade, but in my opinion we should probably keep this thread clear for its intended purpose. :)

At 6/12/24 07:46 PM, tox wrote:

At 6/12/24 07:38 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:27 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:19 PM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:14 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:05 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/12/24 02:02 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:49 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:

At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]

Inflation fetish content rated E.

i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.

Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.

Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.

So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?

Again trying to have civil discourse here.

because i think the barracks do a great job cleaning up all the shit here. i periodically check in to see what y'all are saying.

I recently got something taken down so I wanted to see if there was a shift on the boards.

It felt like in reading here there is a little less leniency. Don't know if something shifted in the discussion here or with staff. But again, I've never thought the Elite Guards ever really take down something without reason. Just thought I'd poke my head in and ask what's up from the side of a user who really doesn't participate in the flagging so ofter to get insight on what I post here.

All curiosity and courtesy. Not trying to be confrontational.

I've always personally leaned towards leniency myself - I only flag a submission if I'm 100% sure its rule-breaking.

V cool. Are any of you open to tagging animators when you post them here? Cus the few I am seeing that I was curious about that wanted to make me post were mostly from normal posters (like myself) that wanted to be a little different/lower effort. If someone had tagged me for instance in my post I probably would have modded it quicker than the mods could. I understand being suspicious of new/spammy looking accounts but like it would seem like most frequently posting animators I know on the site are open to having your reasoning presented.

Usually when we post here we personally don't know the submitters. Tagging them invites unneeded arguments and flaming. Anyone can post anything here, but It's ultimately up to the mods who make the call to remove a submission.

That makes sense if that has been a thing in that past (I know you been on here a while, would love to hear stories of assholes getting mad btw) but it might save time for what is a pretty busy task. i havent seen users get tagged on here for a while.

I for example would not have cared at all to take down my post. And I don't think most people would not be more open to hearing the standards explained more. Maybe a quick peak at the profile to see if they are idk over level 6 and posted more than one thing?

tbh it's pretty daunting to come into the part of the forum (perhaps that is purposeful on the elite guards part) but i cant imagine frequent user would be so upset to have the reasoning explained to them. and for the unreasonable ones it might shut down their bs.

re: leniency. i see a lot of "live action" but i was planning on putting a live action element video on here that is heavy in motion graphics. i was encouraged by other long time users but the posts I have seen recently here are very much not considering motion graphics to be animation and heavily discouraging live action. While i cant see deleted posts, i would like a discussion about "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation."

You were recognized as a good known contributor. I am aware of your positive connection to this website in the past hence why I spoke up and asked someone to reach out (I was at work in the final minutes of break, sorry I didn't personally do so). However it seems a mod elected to remove the submission before that happened. Sorry. :(

As for the suggestion of debating "motion graphic animation" vs "character animation." Maybe that might be a good topic to start over in the animation section of the forum. Not throwing shade, but in my opinion we should probably keep this thread clear for its intended purpose. :)

well aren't you uppidy @PoultrygeistGame
do as much live action as you want as long as there is components of animation added to the piece so that you avoid the

If you want to try live action here, it must be a short film with legit production value and an animation component done in post production.

rule, after that you only have to worry about the production value being high enough for your regular user to rate you over a 2 star rating and it will pass

At 6/12/24 07:50 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:

At 6/12/24 07:46 PM, tox wrote:

lol call me craig p uppityton

also that's good to know. i guess my question to that rule doesnt exactly seem evident by how many post on here are just tagged "live action" bam!

not any posts i have seen have someone quoting that rule in response to someone putting up a suggestion to blam a post for the crime of live action.

At 6/6/24 05:44 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933486[fetish]

What's y'all opinion on this? It's quite clearly fetish content, but it's only rated T. The uploader has made several similar videos in the past that are also rated T. They also have a few M and A-rated videos, but from the few I've seen they go to more extreme lengths than the T rated ones. Should any of this be re-rated? Idk what the exact policy for fetish content is.

At 6/13/24 07:16 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/6/24 05:44 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933486[fetish]

What's y'all opinion on this? It's quite clearly fetish content, but it's only rated T. The uploader has made several similar videos in the past that are also rated T. They also have a few M and A-rated videos, but from the few I've seen they go to more extreme lengths than the T rated ones. Should any of this be re-rated? Idk what the exact policy for fetish content is.

<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934469
anthroblu's done it again - this time, its been rated E

At 6/13/24 07:16 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/6/24 05:44 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933486[fetish]

What's y'all opinion on this? It's quite clearly fetish content, but it's only rated T. The uploader has made several similar videos in the past that are also rated T. They also have a few M and A-rated videos, but from the few I've seen they go to more extreme lengths than the T rated ones. Should any of this be re-rated? Idk what the exact policy for fetish content is.

<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934469
anthroblu's done it again - this time, its been rated E