Speedpaint timelapse footage
Gameplay footage. I assume this is a mod or something.
Reupload of blammed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/934029
At 6/8/24 10:04 PM, Booyaaa wrote:Hey lets flag this: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933825
Because
1.) It's bad
and
2.) Program watermark
Dude just give it a zero star rating
Note: I don't condone Augusto Pinochet's or Ion Antonescu's actions. I like naming my villainous (or flat out evil) OCs after evil historical figures.
Just glitchin' about.
Live action video over that one screen from Metal Gear Solid. No animation.
Just glitchin' about.
Just glitchin' about.
Recording of Paint 3D timeline; no animation
Speedpaint.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/11/24 08:20 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934222
AI-generated
Oh wow, some of those images actually looked pretty realistic. But watching it back now, yeah I'm starting to see signs of AI shenanigans as well. I'd better keep a closer eye out for these things.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/11/24 08:25 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/11/24 08:20 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934222
AI-generated
Oh wow, some of those images actually looked pretty realistic. But watching it back now, yeah I'm starting to see signs of AI shenanigans as well. I'd better keep a closer eye out for these things.
Just remember that AI stuff is allowed if it is used as a complementary tool
Just glitchin' about.
Recordings of still drawings mixed with gameplay footage; no animation
Just glitchin' about.
Slowed/reverb rip of "Senpai Erect (Kawai Sprite Remix)":
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934270 (NSFW)
Gameplay footage
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/767525 (NSFW)
Not original author, as admitted by submitter
(source unknown, suspected lost)
EDIT: Downloaded and saved both SWFs before they get deleted - will try to work out source later
(its 1:16 AM where I live, as of this writing)
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/11/24 02:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/11/24 02:18 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934258
Still image; no animation
Aw man, this is the guy from troma. Someone want to give him a poke?
Yea. Ive seen stuff on here with less animation. I always thought the barracks was for people who were trying to hurt the site. I'm an active, social, and responsive user who uploaded pencil animation the same day. Mighta been nice to just get a dm vs blam. Nice to meet you @glitchbuddy no hard feelings :)
edit: (also thanks for the heads up @yendorng :) )
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 10:46 AM, ElRinconDeRodri wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934360
I hate this type of content, most of which are wanking children
This thread's about rule-breaking content, not merely fucked-up content.
Anyways,
No animation - still image with text underneath
At 6/12/24 10:46 AM, ElRinconDeRodri wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934360
I hate this type of content, most of which are wanking children
I feel like there's some merit to it, but I want somebody to check whether or not the submission has an underage model. While Bmaster is not a first offender, considering Mermaid Factory is a thing I knew and they're taken down, except not for same reason, it's due to shovelware, I feel like the submission is pushing TOO MUCH on the gray area when it comes to underage models and frankly something like a loli or shota suddenly transforming into an adult just makes me disgusted.
At 6/12/24 10:58 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:This thread's about rule-breaking content, not merely fucked-up content.
But I can say that to literally any submission that contains abusive content, sexualized underage models content, or anything remotely bestiality related. Sure, we have a noob who doesn't understand what the hell is the Board for and probably doesn't understand what are the Movie guidelines, but it doesn't necessarily mean it should be thrown out. Ultimately it's on the Movie moderators to see if I'm on the ball or not.
At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/11/24 02:21 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934253
Recordings of still drawings mixed with gameplay footage; no animation
i think another instance of it being appropriate to tag artist @kingdenda5th they have a lot of more involved character animation. If only "character animation"
is animation, then that is an easy enough line to draw but it excludes already popular ways on making content on the site (e.g. meme content is almost never character animated). I think that if motion graphics aren't animation (which i'd say they are), the stills are not filmed they are photos manipulated in after effects aka animated. I want to tag some of the more active people in discussion elsewhere on the forum where longtime users are encouraging more puppetry and motion graphics while on here it seems like using elements and motion graphics are getting flagged. there may be a disconnect between the user base and the guards on where the lines of "animation" are.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
lol @exedor am i wrong?
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.
At 6/12/24 01:38 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 6/12/24 01:24 PM, PoultrygeistGame wrote:Bro, there is NO DEFENSE here. It's open and shut case, dude makes inflation porn on his DeviantArt account AND FurAffinity, the evidence is RIGHT in front of the submission, it says InflatableBlu which obviously is his account because oh look, his dA submission links to THAT submission. Can you tell me with that face of yours and seeing both his favorites in his dA and FA account and say "it's not fetish content dude." It deserves the M rating for being a fetish, it's been that way ever since his first upload, albeit it's overrated because I don't see a penis despite being A but it's not an offense to report anyway because the Improper rule is meant to punish people like Anthroblu for failing to rate their content properly by leaving it E or way lower despite of what content there is. If bro submits porn and if it's E, the mods ARE GOING TO make it A.At 6/12/24 04:12 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/934345[fetish]
Inflation fetish content rated E.
i'd like to hear @anthroblu defend themselves. i am not sure that having breasts makes something fetish work as all females have boobs. the user appropriately tagged another animation where it was treated as a sex act but this is just someone being inflated. dig dug isnt fetish art. the tags and descriptions in no way depict fetish work.
Firstly cant tell your vibe, re: if you are not chill. I am coming at this from trying to understand rules/an academic debate. Would like to be v calm.
So that being said, there are lots of intensely popular porn accounts that label clothed version of their characters that are literally cum covered in other posts as "e." That is all I am asking. AND really what I am asking is: "am i, as a newgrounds user, supposed to flag content from a porn creator as "A" even when it is sfw?
Again trying to have civil discourse here.
I podcast, make documentaries, cartoons, games and art. I also hate lawns. Love weasels. Am neutral on Snow Cones. I feel nothing about snow cones. Sometimes they are nice.
