At 6/6/24 01:27 AM, gamejunkie wrote:At 6/6/24 12:52 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:This post was already a few months old by now, but still.
Yeah I have her userpage bookmarked so I can check back occasionally, as I do with many others. I only found that yesterday.
One of the points she made was that if she's going to get punished, dozens of other artists would have to get the same treatment (ie. there's still dozens of lewd art of Gwen Stacy, MHA, or Pokemon characters who are minors), otherwise you'd get called out as a hypocrite because the rule appears to be enforced inconsistently for unknown reasons.
Yes I get that & I explained to her dozens of times that I'm a Game/Movie Portal Mod & that I had (before unpublishing her stuff) already unpublished hundreds of Underage Content movies (many of which were Gwen Stacy) (& FYI dozens more after). She just would not accept it.
Her argument lies on the fact that other people have uploaded the same stuff as you, yet they weren't taken down:
Ideally, you should try to prove that by citing some submissions that weren't removed
If you don't cite them, how are you supposed to prove your point?
But if you do, they too will get reported and their stuff removed because it is against site rules, and full-on illegal in some countries. Yet you don't want to do this for some reason. Does this not seem suspicious?
I even gave her the opportunity to send me links to any offending movies, she declined saying that, 'I'm not gonna Rat out my fellow CP colleagues."
I don't know if she actually said that, or you're paraphrasing, but you can't claim other artists aren't in the wrong when they draw that stuff, whilst also saying they are in the wrong and refusing to provide any links to their work. Why would you withhold something that you think should be all onboard? Can't have it both ways.
This wouldn't fly in a court of law, you're under oath.
a. differences in the Art and Movie Guidelines.
Yes.
There is a difference, Movie/Game says not to look for grey areas, but Art goes into detail on what's not allowed, explaining the judgement is based on the image alone.
I've seen a huge lot of Pokemon, MHA, Gwen Stacy, porn etc. on the Art Portal, from a glance, and I'm uncertain about whether to flag/report them because of this:
I'm worried both types of content might not be enforced equally in this regard, seems like Art is given more leeway than Movies/Games. It'd be nice to know why this is or isn't the case.
c. mods don't have enough time to comb through years of what may or may not be CP.
I do but there's so much of it. I have dozens of userpages bookmarked that I still need to go through hundreds of movies. To be honest I had to stop for a while having watched so many Uderage Content movies in a short time started to give me brain fog. I'll be getting back to all those bookmarked guys very shortly, so expect dozens if not hundreds more movies ti disappear. Anyone who finds a genuine UC movie is more than welcome to send a link to me & I'll go through all that users content to check it.
Things to look for are Gwen Stacy (obviously), anything Pokemon, Genshin Impact, Last of Us - Elle, The Persona series, etc, you guys shouldn't be told what to look for by now.
I appreciate your service. That stuff's a HUGE mess, some have been up for months, if not years.
PS: It seems like at least one of the movies was reinstated following that post.
That may have been me, I was just checking something. TBH I was not aware submitters could block individuals from posting reviews, so I changed profiles to check, then changed back & unpublished it again. She has blocked me from all contact BUT alas she CANNOT block me from unpublishing her Underage content. So regardless, I WIN.
I only know of that one you reviewed, which is still up as of making this post.
Send me a link to what you think may have been re-uploaded by her, I'll check it out soon.
The last two I sent you before didn't count, one instead broke the gameplay rule.
On a similar topic: I recall this one thread where a new author had his Jenny video taken down for what he thought was copyrighted music. I suggested it could be the underage rule, and since then, he's posted it a third time and it's still up as of writing.
