https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933621 (NSFW)
Stolen porn animations. The watermarks of the original creators are still visible throughout the video
Just glitchin' about.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933698[911 footage]
More 9/11 stuff by the same uploader that I caught just now. All this is is audio paired with a picture slideshow.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/7/24 05:01 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/7/24 04:54 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933695[911 footage]
Live-action; no animation
cipherjoe9 is actively uploading 9/11 related material that features no animation or original art in all portals. Requesting artillery support.
Already reported everything and called in support from Audio Portal Cleanup.
At 6/7/24 05:01 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/7/24 04:54 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933695[911 footage]
Live-action; no animation
cipherjoe9 is actively uploading 9/11 related material that features no animation or original art in all portals. Requesting artillery support.
From the user's bio:
"I’m a 9/11 archivist and a digital hoarder. I prefer to upload this stuff on here rather than YouTube because it has less chance being taken down."
This isn't what Newgrounds is for, plain and simple.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/7/24 05:01 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/7/24 04:54 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933695[911 footage]
Live-action; no animation
cipherjoe9 is actively uploading 9/11 related material that features no animation or original art in all portals. Requesting artillery support.
Removed. Yikes, people!
At 6/7/24 05:10 PM, guthrie wrote:At 6/7/24 05:01 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/7/24 04:54 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933695[911 footage]
Live-action; no animation
cipherjoe9 is actively uploading 9/11 related material that features no animation or original art in all portals. Requesting artillery support.
Removed. Yikes, people!
In the interim, I've also politely told Cipher NG isn't the place for his 9/11 archives, and pointed him to the Internet Archive.
Art and Audio mods should mop the rest of his subs in due time.
Hopefully, this should be the last we see of him and his 9/11 archive. (A sentence I hope I never have to say again.)
Rated M and tagged "bloody" despite a complete lack of blood
At 6/8/24 05:17 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933739
Rated M and tagged "bloody" despite a complete lack of blood
Did you even watch the submission?? Like not even at 2:38, 4:22, 4:28, 6:39, and 6:48 and made you think "Yeah, I can see why it gets the M rating." And even then, just because a submission can be rated M for some nudity, it doesn't mean it should be reported for improper ratings. Why is this the case? Because the rule is meant to punish people who fail to rate the content appropriately by underrating it, like for example, a submission rated E despite containing sex, or a submission rated T despite everyone's written by Vivziepop and you hear constant profanity.
At 6/8/24 08:21 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 6/8/24 05:17 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933739Did you even watch the submission?? Like not even at 2:38, 4:22, 4:28, 6:39, and 6:48 and made you think "Yeah, I can see why it gets the M rating." And even then, just because a submission can be rated M for some nudity, it doesn't mean it should be reported for improper ratings. Why is this the case? Because the rule is meant to punish people who fail to rate the content appropriately by underrating it, like for example, a submission rated E despite containing sex, or a submission rated T despite everyone's written by Vivziepop and you hear constant profanity.
Rated M and tagged "bloody" despite a complete lack of blood
I initially reported it back when the sub was only 20 seconds long and lacked any audio.
My dumb ass should've recognised that the uploader was gonna unfuck that movie.
Reupload of blammed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/933611
At 6/7/24 08:25 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:
Stolen: https://ninja-muffin24.itch.io/friday-night-funkin
Did you read the name of the person who posted this
Note: I don't condone Augusto Pinochet's or Ion Antonescu's actions. I like naming my villainous (or flat out evil) OCs after evil historical figures.
At 6/8/24 09:46 AM, Hoppio wrote:At 6/7/24 08:25 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:
Stolen: https://ninja-muffin24.itch.io/friday-night-funkin
Did you read the name of the person who posted this
Note: I don't condone Augusto Pinochet's or Ion Antonescu's actions. I like naming my villainous (or flat out evil) OCs after evil historical figures.
Just glitchin' about.
Hey lets flag this: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933825
Because
1.) It's bad
and
2.) Program watermark
Sir. Michael James Anderson III Esquire M.D.
At 6/8/24 10:06 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 6/8/24 10:04 PM, Booyaaa wrote:Hey lets flag this: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933825
Because
1.) It's bad
and
2.) Program watermark
Neither of these things are rule breaking.
Yeah @Booyaaa, feel free to flag it, but know that all you'll really accomplish is wasting the mod team's time and hurting your whistle status.
If you want to learn more about how to submit good, effective flags, please read through the NG Wiki on movie and game submissions and come back to us with any questions you have. Happy hunting!
At 6/8/24 10:21 PM, YendorNG wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933880
I can't tell if this is a attack on another artist or just stolen stuff.
Your prayers have been answered: it's stolen from Space Goofs, which is an obscure French animated show and I say this not because I know the show, except I know the show from the fact that Xilam worked on Oggy and the Cockroaches and let's say I thought about looking at the Wikipedia around and bam, here we are.
But I don't know the episode it's taken from, so safest bet it's stolen from the show.
ElRandomGMD (aka RandomToons)
Just glitchin' about.
Just glitchin' about.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/8/24 08:36 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/8/24 08:21 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:I initially reported it back when the sub was only 20 seconds long and lacked any audio.At 6/8/24 05:17 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933739Did you even watch the submission?? Like not even at 2:38, 4:22, 4:28, 6:39, and 6:48 and made you think "Yeah, I can see why it gets the M rating." And even then, just because a submission can be rated M for some nudity, it doesn't mean it should be reported for improper ratings. Why is this the case? Because the rule is meant to punish people who fail to rate the content appropriately by underrating it, like for example, a submission rated E despite containing sex, or a submission rated T despite everyone's written by Vivziepop and you hear constant profanity.
Rated M and tagged "bloody" despite a complete lack of blood
My dumb ass should've recognised that the uploader was gonna unfuck that movie.
Can attest to this being the case btw. When BlueMonday1984 posted the submission here initially it was only 4 seconds long and ended at the part where they cut from the green to the blue alien-looking thing.
<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933915
Rated M despite being an animation of someone giving a blowjob
Recording of TV screen; no original animation
Just glitchin' about.
Just glitchin' about.
Stolen from [@]FTVB2K4 on YouTube per uploader's admission. Was unable to find the exact video.
Just glitchin' about.
