At 5/31/24 09:08 PM, tox wrote:I love this description so much that I had to immortalize it

"
This AI short film is roughly based on one of my old comics and is more of an experiment. An attempt to produce a movie with the currently available AI tools. When I realized that any interaction between characters with current AI-to-video generators was almost impossible and would take a lot of effort to accomplish, I decided to finish the short film earlier than planned, which is why there is very little physical interaction and the ending is very abrupt.

I may, if there is enough demand, illustrate my workflow for creating this movie. Enjoy.
"
-geneticeye
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932678

At 6/1/24 11:48 AM, tox wrote:

At 5/31/24 09:08 PM, tox wrote:I love this description so much that I had to immortalize it

"
This AI short film is roughly based on one of my old comics and is more of an experiment. An attempt to produce a movie with the currently available AI tools. When I realized that any interaction between characters with current AI-to-video generators was almost impossible and would take a lot of effort to accomplish, I decided to finish the short film earlier than planned, which is why there is very little physical interaction and the ending is very abrupt.

I may, if there is enough demand, illustrate my workflow for creating this movie. Enjoy.
"
-geneticeye
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932678

Hold on and wait a second!

Why was my report dismissed?

An AI is doing most of the creative work here with the users prompts to tell it how to situate a character or things like that
this can't be a valid use of AI animation

I/we/you can't just write a lengthy paragraph of 30 minutes, spend 20 minutes researching how to get characters to interact, get told it is impossible and then decide to scrap that idea and put out a product that would take months to make in an afternoon

I said I loved it because of how blatant the rule violation was, this kind of thing would set a terrible president for animators

At 6/1/24 12:17 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:

At 6/1/24 11:48 AM, tox wrote:

At 5/31/24 09:08 PM, tox wrote:I love this description so much that I had to immortalize it

"
This AI short film is roughly based on one of my old comics and is more of an experiment. An attempt to produce a movie with the currently available AI tools. When I realized that any interaction between characters with current AI-to-video generators was almost impossible and would take a lot of effort to accomplish, I decided to finish the short film earlier than planned, which is why there is very little physical interaction and the ending is very abrupt.

I may, if there is enough demand, illustrate my workflow for creating this movie. Enjoy.
"
-geneticeye
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932678

Hold on and wait a second!

Why was my report dismissed?

An AI is doing most of the creative work here with the users prompts to tell it how to situate a character or things like that
this can't be a valid use of AI animation

I/we/you can't just write a lengthy paragraph of 30 minutes, spend 20 minutes researching how to get characters to interact, get told it is impossible and then decide to scrap that idea and put out a product that would take months to make in an afternoon

I said I loved it because of how blatant the rule violation was, this kind of thing would set a terrible president for animators

Yeah, that's a bit concerning, especially since they're straight up admitting it in the description. It might be something you have to DM Tom/another senior staff member about.

At 5/30/24 12:31 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:Hi there,
I have been regularly posting unsuitable submissions to the thread for just under a month now, and so I would again like to enquire about an entry into the ROTC. This is something I enjoy doing a lot, and so it would mean a lot to me to be able to join the Elite Guard Barracks.

I've noticed none of the senior officers have posted to the thread since I started posting, so I'm wondering if I will have to wait for one to be available before we can discuss this any further. Aside from that, thank you for having me here so far, and I shall be eagerly awaiting a reply!

At 6/3/24 12:58 AM, Exedor wrote:

At 6/2/24 12:21 PM, Hoppio wrote:(nsfw) https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932953
Almost entirely AI generated

Ugh. Has AI art, but has [stupid] game functions programmed. AI assets in games are allowed. V0te what you like th0.

At 6/3/24 12:51 AM, byteslinger wrote:

At 5/30/24 12:31 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:Hi there,
I have been regularly posting unsuitable submissions to the thread for just under a month now, and so I would again like to enquire about an entry into the ROTC. This is something I enjoy doing a lot, and so it would mean a lot to me to be able to join the Elite Guard Barracks.

I've noticed none of the senior officers have posted to the thread since I started posting, so I'm wondering if I will have to wait for one to be available before we can discuss this any further. Aside from that, thank you for having me here so far, and I shall be eagerly awaiting a reply!

Hello, Glitchbuddy.

Sorry about the delay in getting back to you - was a bit busy IRL these past few days, finally had time to get back to my emails and posts. Upon review of your account, I also think you would be a good candidate for the EGB ROTC program. I will confer with the other members of the Barracks to garner their opinions. I will get back to you in a few days with an answer (most likely yes, but we'll confirm that with the other senior members).

Thank you for your interest and your contributions - you will definitely be hearing back from me soon.

Regards,
EGSC byteslinger,
Chief Barracks Officer.

At 6/3/24 07:58 PM, guthrie wrote:

At 6/3/24 07:55 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933072

I had flagged this submission for using copyrighted audio (a little snippet at the end), but it seems to have stayed up. How come? Was the snippet too short?

Chill dude, it's been a long day for me irl. Remember that we're volunteers and have real jobs so we can't get to most flags immediately after you submit them.

At 6/3/24 08:09 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:

At 6/3/24 07:58 PM, guthrie wrote:

At 6/3/24 07:55 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933072

I had flagged this submission for using copyrighted audio (a little snippet at the end), but it seems to have stayed up. How come? Was the snippet too short?

Chill dude, it's been a long day for me irl. Remember that we're volunteers and have real jobs so we can't get to most flags immediately after you submit them.

I should have mentioned that I flagged the submission at the beginning of the day (~16 hours ago).

At 6/3/24 08:14 PM, Madmazel wrote:

At 6/3/24 08:09 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:

At 6/3/24 07:58 PM, guthrie wrote:

At 6/3/24 07:55 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/933072

I had flagged this submission for using copyrighted audio (a little snippet at the end), but it seems to have stayed up. How come? Was the snippet too short?

Chill dude, it's been a long day for me irl. Remember that we're volunteers and have real jobs so we can't get to most flags immediately after you submit them.

I should have mentioned that I flagged the submission at the beginning of the day (~16 hours ago).

What's the rush? :p

I usually wait a day to see if my reports were dealt with, they almost always are.