ADULT CONTENT
This video is a very minor edit to an existing animation. Due to the heavy compression artifacts when zoomed in I strongly suspect it is not a "remake" as the title suggests. The way the fluid drips in the exact same manner is also suspicious.
At 4/19/24 10:18 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/19/24 10:06 PM, Czyszy wrote:Well, the gameplay footage is around 8 seconds and the total time of the video is 17 seconds...At 4/19/24 10:03 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/19/24 09:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926589
To flag or not to flag? Literally one half of this submission is gameplay footage, and the other half is custom animation.
Its terrible, but not reportable. He's using the game play footage to lead into his parody which makes it fair use I supposed.
It's the age old half-empty vs. half-full dillemma all over again! xD
Is this an original animation with an overly long gameplay intro? Or is this a gameplay clip with an extented animated outro?
Close to an half-ish, but it's not a half unless you round it. Also this is more of proxy, do I look like a nerd? Don't got the time to just find this exact frame or just download it and check the frame count.
So apparently the gameplay footage takes up more than half of the video. 😜
At 4/19/24 10:26 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/19/24 10:18 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/19/24 10:06 PM, Czyszy wrote:Well, the gameplay footage is around 8 seconds and the total time of the video is 17 seconds...At 4/19/24 10:03 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/19/24 09:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926589
To flag or not to flag? Literally one half of this submission is gameplay footage, and the other half is custom animation.
Its terrible, but not reportable. He's using the game play footage to lead into his parody which makes it fair use I supposed.
It's the age old half-empty vs. half-full dillemma all over again! xD
Is this an original animation with an overly long gameplay intro? Or is this a gameplay clip with an extented animated outro?
Close to an half-ish, but it's not a half unless you round it. Also this is more of proxy, do I look like a nerd? Don't got the time to just find this exact frame or just download it and check the frame count.
So apparently the gameplay footage takes up more than half of the video. 😜
Even 9 seconds of animation on its own is pretty miniscule and low-effort, why just pad it up to 17?
Even then, there are only two shots with barely any animation: the above image, which zooms in to the cruddy burger, and this one, where his hand tweens.
Could've done that in 10 minutes!
Music is "Blood and Thunder" by Mastodon, which is copyrighted by Relapse Records:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnwZca8z9II
No animation - slideshow
Pitched-down Hazbin Hotel footage:
he/they - pretty cool guy
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
Well, these are cartoons aimed at kids/people of all ages. I mean, it's not like there are a lot of epsodes of ADGtH TV show that are pure hentai?
This is exactly why I brought up this artist's other uploads (all of which are A rated)! To get a larger context that can often help to decide on how ambiguously sexual material should be rated! I mean, the uploader's target audience is clearly hentai watchers! Heck, the description section of the E rated spanking video itself has links to this artist's NSFW material!!!
At 4/20/24 08:36 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:26 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
Well, these are cartoons aimed at kids/people of all ages. I mean, it's not like there are a lot of epsodes of ADGtH TV show that are pure hentai?
This is exactly why I brought up this artist's other uploads (all of which are A rated)! To get a larger context that can often help to decide on how ambiguously sexual material should be rated! I mean, the uploader's target audience is clearly hentai watchers! Heck, the description section of the E rated spanking video itself has links to this artist's NSFW material!!!
I do agree, more context is needed to show this isn't what we adults like to think it is, and the subscribestar link doesn't help matters. On the side of the animator however... this is probably the most tame and most ORIGINAL thing they've uploaded to NG (the other, being an A-rated, furry thing notwithstanding).
But its not up to us. :/
I agree. But even then the video is clearly:
no matter how you look at it xd
At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
The better explanation is you guys didn't post it here (or we didn't see it if you did), the mod queue is huge, it's a relatively low priority, and we just didn't get to it yet.
No shade, just try to chill out a bit!
At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
I think we can all tell between a sexual spank and a comedy spank.
Some of the best advice I got about flagging materials is to flag the item and then simply move on
If you want to track things then favorite them inside of a tab for yourself and revisit it in a week and see if anything changed
Just remember that mods are volunteers
At 4/20/24 10:21 AM, tox wrote:Some of the best advice I got about flagging materials is to flag the item and then simply move on
If you want to track things then favorite them inside of a tab for yourself and revisit it in a week and see if anything changed
Just remember that mods are volunteers
It turns out I was spoiled by the short waiting times for the results of my content flagging so far! xD
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/20/24 01:35 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 01:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Rip of Universal Studios vanity plate
GartnerKid needs nuked IMO he is clearly part of the whistlefarmer conspiracy.
Here is another one of his:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
do not award me points if possible, thanks
You accidentally posted the same sub twice.
he/they - pretty cool guy
In the interim, I also found this on patrol:
No animation - still image
BGM is "Right Now" by Korn:
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/20/24 01:35 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 01:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Rip of Universal Studios vanity plate
GartnerKid needs nuked IMO he is clearly part of the whistlefarmer conspiracy.
Here is another one of his:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926834
do not award me points if possible, thanks
Whistlefarmer consipiracy?
At 4/20/24 03:11 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 4/20/24 01:35 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 01:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Rip of Universal Studios vanity plate
GartnerKid needs nuked IMO he is clearly part of the whistlefarmer conspiracy.
Here is another one of his:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926834
do not award me points if possible, thanks
Whistlefarmer consipiracy?
This the first time I've heard of it - a quick search of the BBS brought me nothing.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/20/24 03:42 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 03:11 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:This the first time I've heard of it - a quick search of the BBS brought me nothing.At 4/20/24 01:35 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 01:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Rip of Universal Studios vanity plate
GartnerKid needs nuked IMO he is clearly part of the whistlefarmer conspiracy.
Here is another one of his:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926834
do not award me points if possible, thanks
Whistlefarmer consipiracy?
Does it have anything to do with creating alt accounts solely to post stolen content, you know, to claim free whistle points? (very illegal)
At 4/20/24 01:35 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 01:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Rip of Universal Studios vanity plate
GartnerKid needs nuked IMO he is clearly part of the whistlefarmer conspiracy.
Here is another one of his:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926834
do not award me points if possible, thanks
So you're saying someone here is deliberately breaking the NG rules to give someone else or perhaps even an ALT account of theirs free whistle points? Correct? Do you have any evidence to back up your theory? :P
But anyway, this situation feels a bit like an IRL equivalent of the Major Man scam from Powerpuff Girls xD
At 4/20/24 04:15 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 01:35 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 01:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Rip of Universal Studios vanity plate
GartnerKid needs nuked IMO he is clearly part of the whistlefarmer conspiracy.
Here is another one of his:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926834
do not award me points if possible, thanks
So you're saying someone here is deliberately breaking the NG rules to give someone else or perhaps even an ALT account of theirs free whistle points? Correct? Do you have any evidence to back up your theory? :P
As a casual user, we have no way of knowing. A moderator might be able to trace their IP, but in that case, it's just going to be handled privately. Open and shut with none the wiser!
he/they - pretty cool guy
No animation - does not function (checking the link brings me to a still image of a dog)
he/they - pretty cool guy
<MISRATED, VORE>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926937
Rated E despite fetish content
he/they - pretty cool guy
Just Universal's logo. Obviously doesn't belong to the uploader.
At 4/21/24 08:20 AM, freaks-heart wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926952
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926953
Just Universal's logo. Obviously doesn't belong to the uploader.
Gartner's also a repeat offender, having uploaded both of these before.
1997 vanity plate: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926834
2013 vanity plate: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Investigating their reviews, they seem really fucking obsessed with that logo.
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
I hate those logo/numberblock kids
At 4/21/24 08:20 AM, freaks-heart wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926952
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926953
Just Universal's logo. Obviously doesn't belong to the uploader.
At 4/21/24 06:21 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED, VORE>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926937
Rated E despite fetish content
*Rated T despite fetish content
