Reup of blammed. Might get blammed again, but whatever. Usually there's a 50/50 chance this will get taken down or blammed.
No animation. Consists majority of live-action footage.
No way he actually got banned
At 4/17/24 07:43 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:All right this user needs to be banned I just don't care I want him goneAt 4/17/24 02:41 PM, Da-Birb wrote:At 4/17/24 01:46 PM, gamejunkie wrote:I'd like to thank everyone involved in the last 3 pages of drama for making my birthday a great one. Sitting back & watching this drama unfold has been magnificent. Quality stuff indeed.
nice another mod in support of this bs, happy bday buddy
At 4/18/24 04:34 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:No way he actually got bannedAt 4/17/24 07:43 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:All right this user needs to be banned I just don't care I want him goneAt 4/17/24 02:41 PM, Da-Birb wrote:At 4/17/24 01:46 PM, gamejunkie wrote:I'd like to thank everyone involved in the last 3 pages of drama for making my birthday a great one. Sitting back & watching this drama unfold has been magnificent. Quality stuff indeed.
nice another mod in support of this bs, happy bday buddy
After seeing the guy blow his lid and start insulting everyone, I absolutely should have seen this coming.
Anyways...
Reupload of removed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926336
Reupload of blammed sub:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/926487
Generated by Stable Diffusion, as admitted by submitter
AI-generated voices and backgrounds (submitted by the same person behind the Billy Mays AI infomercial)
At 4/18/24 05:01 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:Anyways...
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926541
Reupload of removed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926336
OBJECTION:
There's new music from the Audio Portal. Is that not an improvement, as per the Movie Guidelines?
Do not re-submit your entry after it has been BLAMMED without making noticeable improvements.
(This includes Moderator removals)
At 4/19/24 10:44 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 4/18/24 05:01 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:Anyways...
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926541
Reupload of removed submission: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926336
OBJECTION:
There's new music from the Audio Portal. Is that not an improvement, as per the Movie Guidelines?
I flagged it before Piconjo swapped the music - the visuals are still derivative of placeboing's "Gay Frogs", but the new music's original enough for me to let it through.
At 4/19/24 06:07 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/19/24 05:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:Anyways,
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926714
Speedpaint
Awh man, I really like coconutgun. Now we have to show him a real gun. 🔫
No one's above the law here, no matter how beloved they are.
At 4/19/24 06:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/19/24 06:07 PM, YendorNG wrote:No one's above the law here, no matter how beloved they are.At 4/19/24 05:58 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:Anyways,
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926714
Speedpaint
Awh man, I really like coconutgun. Now we have to show him a real gun. 🔫
Yeah, this is unfortunate. But only about half of the submission was a speed paint so hopefully it comes back soon.
To flag or not to flag? Literally one half of this submission is gameplay footage, and the other half is custom animation.
At 4/19/24 10:03 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/19/24 09:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926589
To flag or not to flag? Literally one half of this submission is gameplay footage, and the other half is custom animation.
Its terrible, but not reportable. He's using the game play footage to lead into his parody which makes it fair use I supposed.
It's the age old half-empty vs. half-full dillemma all over again! xD
Is this an original animation with an overly long gameplay intro? Or is this a gameplay clip with an extented animated outro?
At 4/19/24 10:06 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/19/24 10:03 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/19/24 09:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926589
To flag or not to flag? Literally one half of this submission is gameplay footage, and the other half is custom animation.
Its terrible, but not reportable. He's using the game play footage to lead into his parody which makes it fair use I supposed.
It's the age old half-empty vs. half-full dillemma all over again! xD
Is this an original animation with an overly long gameplay intro? Or is this a gameplay clip with an extented animated outro?
Well, the gameplay footage is around 8 seconds and the total time of the video is 17 seconds...
Close to an half-ish, but it's not a half unless you round it. Also this is more of proxy, do I look like a nerd? Don't got the time to just find this exact frame or just download it and check the frame count.
ADULT CONTENT
This video is a very minor edit to an existing animation. Due to the heavy compression artifacts when zoomed in I strongly suspect it is not a "remake" as the title suggests. The way the fluid drips in the exact same manner is also suspicious.
At 4/19/24 10:18 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/19/24 10:06 PM, Czyszy wrote:Well, the gameplay footage is around 8 seconds and the total time of the video is 17 seconds...At 4/19/24 10:03 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/19/24 09:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926589
To flag or not to flag? Literally one half of this submission is gameplay footage, and the other half is custom animation.
Its terrible, but not reportable. He's using the game play footage to lead into his parody which makes it fair use I supposed.
It's the age old half-empty vs. half-full dillemma all over again! xD
Is this an original animation with an overly long gameplay intro? Or is this a gameplay clip with an extented animated outro?
Close to an half-ish, but it's not a half unless you round it. Also this is more of proxy, do I look like a nerd? Don't got the time to just find this exact frame or just download it and check the frame count.
So apparently the gameplay footage takes up more than half of the video. 😜
At 4/19/24 10:26 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/19/24 10:18 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/19/24 10:06 PM, Czyszy wrote:Well, the gameplay footage is around 8 seconds and the total time of the video is 17 seconds...At 4/19/24 10:03 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/19/24 09:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926589
To flag or not to flag? Literally one half of this submission is gameplay footage, and the other half is custom animation.
Its terrible, but not reportable. He's using the game play footage to lead into his parody which makes it fair use I supposed.
It's the age old half-empty vs. half-full dillemma all over again! xD
Is this an original animation with an overly long gameplay intro? Or is this a gameplay clip with an extented animated outro?
Close to an half-ish, but it's not a half unless you round it. Also this is more of proxy, do I look like a nerd? Don't got the time to just find this exact frame or just download it and check the frame count.
So apparently the gameplay footage takes up more than half of the video. 😜
Even 9 seconds of animation on its own is pretty miniscule and low-effort, why just pad it up to 17?
Even then, there are only two shots with barely any animation: the above image, which zooms in to the cruddy burger, and this one, where his hand tweens.
Could've done that in 10 minutes!
Music is "Blood and Thunder" by Mastodon, which is copyrighted by Relapse Records:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnwZca8z9II
No animation - slideshow
Pitched-down Hazbin Hotel footage:
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
Well, these are cartoons aimed at kids/people of all ages. I mean, it's not like there are a lot of epsodes of ADGtH TV show that are pure hentai?
This is exactly why I brought up this artist's other uploads (all of which are A rated)! To get a larger context that can often help to decide on how ambiguously sexual material should be rated! I mean, the uploader's target audience is clearly hentai watchers! Heck, the description section of the E rated spanking video itself has links to this artist's NSFW material!!!
At 4/20/24 08:36 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:26 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
Well, these are cartoons aimed at kids/people of all ages. I mean, it's not like there are a lot of epsodes of ADGtH TV show that are pure hentai?
This is exactly why I brought up this artist's other uploads (all of which are A rated)! To get a larger context that can often help to decide on how ambiguously sexual material should be rated! I mean, the uploader's target audience is clearly hentai watchers! Heck, the description section of the E rated spanking video itself has links to this artist's NSFW material!!!
I do agree, more context is needed to show this isn't what we adults like to think it is, and the subscribestar link doesn't help matters. On the side of the animator however... this is probably the most tame and most ORIGINAL thing they've uploaded to NG (the other, being an A-rated, furry thing notwithstanding).
But its not up to us. :/
I agree. But even then the video is clearly:
no matter how you look at it xd
At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
The better explanation is you guys didn't post it here (or we didn't see it if you did), the mod queue is huge, it's a relatively low priority, and we just didn't get to it yet.
No shade, just try to chill out a bit!
At 4/20/24 08:12 AM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 08:02 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/20/24 07:55 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/20/24 07:50 AM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926688The comedic aspects probably played a role - this was more overly intended as a shitpost than anything titllating.
I flagged this one about 2 days ago as inappropriate because even though it's "SFW" (which is debatable but whatever), it still features enough sexual themes to be rated higher than E. But so far, it seems my flag had no effect.
Well, I'd say no. This uploader's stuff is almost all A-rated stuff, so IMO it isn't a "shitpost" but rather a teaser for this artist's NSFW hentai content behind the Subscribestar paywall! I think that alone makes this anything BUT an E rated movie!
Ah, but then there is this: EDIT: BETTER REFERENCE
Perhaps, we are wrong.
I think we can all tell between a sexual spank and a comedy spank.
Some of the best advice I got about flagging materials is to flag the item and then simply move on
If you want to track things then favorite them inside of a tab for yourself and revisit it in a week and see if anything changed
Just remember that mods are volunteers
At 4/20/24 10:21 AM, tox wrote:Some of the best advice I got about flagging materials is to flag the item and then simply move on
If you want to track things then favorite them inside of a tab for yourself and revisit it in a week and see if anything changed
Just remember that mods are volunteers
It turns out I was spoiled by the short waiting times for the results of my content flagging so far! xD
At 4/20/24 01:35 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 4/20/24 01:29 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
Rip of Universal Studios vanity plate
GartnerKid needs nuked IMO he is clearly part of the whistlefarmer conspiracy.
Here is another one of his:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926832
do not award me points if possible, thanks
You accidentally posted the same sub twice.
