At 4/21/24 09:06 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 4/21/24 06:21 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED, VORE>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926937
Rated E despite fetish content
*Rated T despite fetish content
Thanks for catching that.
he/they - pretty cool guy
Advertisement - recommend watching the submitter, they seem like a spambot
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/21/24 12:04 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926973
Advertisement - recommend watching the submitter, they seem like a spambot
the link in the bio is malicious too
At 4/21/24 02:56 PM, wolfatthedoor wrote:At 4/21/24 12:04 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/926973the link in the bio is malicious too
Advertisement - recommend watching the submitter, they seem like a spambot
https://peveg47107.newgrounds.com/
indeed, if you click the continue button of their linked websites then you automatically accept the cookie/download/worm or whatever is ready to go inside of that link
https://www.scam-detector.com/validator/verifyuser-org-review/
which when looked into a little more by smarter people, reveals that it's a shell company/website for real phishing websites and malware websites/codes
sooo...
@TomFulp, could you magic this profile up?
I also love that the register name for that domain is
BGM is a pitched-down version of "Break Your Heart" by Taio Cruz, which is copyrighted by Universal Island Records:
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
Gameplay footage. No animation
Modded Friday Night Fuckin gameplay footage. No animation
No animation
Submission missing
No animation - still image
he/they - pretty cool guy
A quick Google search shows that this capybara is not original.
https://tenor.com/view/capydance-gif-8638908081325972925
https://sweezy-cursors.com/cursor/capybara-dancing-animated/
No animation - still image
Repeat offence: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927086
he/they - pretty cool guy
Speedpaint
Specterr visualizer
he/they - pretty cool guy
No animation - music project timelines
(Sidenote: One of the tags on that is epic-battle-fantasy and I have zero clue why)
he/they - pretty cool guy
Reuploading blammed content
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
SPEEDPAINT AND COPYRIGHT MUSIC
At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
At 4/24/24 10:10 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
I just basically reported it for speedpaint. Unless Tom says it's okay, I just don't like this kind of smartass-ery. It could've just been saved without the speedpaint, I mean sure, it's like 9 (or something like 17 seconds if we're counting the end.) seconds, but who cares? Or if it needed that speedpaint aspect, why not just animate the IDEA of speed painting? Example of what I'm talking about is if the final product has a ocean in the background, the animator should draw rain or water being poured down to fill exactly what the final picture looks like.
At 4/24/24 10:49 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/24/24 10:10 PM, Czyszy wrote:I just basically reported it for speedpaint. Unless Tom says it's okay, I just don't like this kind of smartass-ery. It could've just been saved without the speedpaint, I mean sure, it's like 9 (or something like 17 seconds if we're counting the end.) seconds, but who cares? Or if it needed that speedpaint aspect, why not just animate the IDEA of speed painting? Example of what I'm talking about is if the final product has a ocean in the background, the animator should draw rain or water being poured down to fill exactly what the final picture looks like.At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
It's fine to be snarky. The purpose of the submission isn't solely to be a speedpaint so I think it can stay.
At 4/24/24 10:49 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/24/24 10:10 PM, Czyszy wrote:I just basically reported it for speedpaint. Unless Tom says it's okay, I just don't like this kind of smartass-ery. It could've just been saved without the speedpaint, I mean sure, it's like 9 (or something like 17 seconds if we're counting the end.) seconds, but who cares? Or if it needed that speedpaint aspect, why not just animate the IDEA of speed painting? Example of what I'm talking about is if the final product has a ocean in the background, the animator should draw rain or water being poured down to fill exactly what the final picture looks like.At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
But either way, the audio is copyrighted. It's a song by King Gizzard. Hope you don't mind me flagging it as "MUSIC".
At 4/24/24 11:50 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/24/24 10:49 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/24/24 10:10 PM, Czyszy wrote:I just basically reported it for speedpaint. Unless Tom says it's okay, I just don't like this kind of smartass-ery. It could've just been saved without the speedpaint, I mean sure, it's like 9 (or something like 17 seconds if we're counting the end.) seconds, but who cares? Or if it needed that speedpaint aspect, why not just animate the IDEA of speed painting? Example of what I'm talking about is if the final product has a ocean in the background, the animator should draw rain or water being poured down to fill exactly what the final picture looks like.At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
But either way, the audio is copyrighted. It's a song by King Gizzard. Hope you don't mind me flagging it as "MUSIC".
that audio is not copyrighted bud
At 4/25/24 01:08 AM, tox wrote:At 4/24/24 11:50 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/24/24 10:49 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/24/24 10:10 PM, Czyszy wrote:I just basically reported it for speedpaint. Unless Tom says it's okay, I just don't like this kind of smartass-ery. It could've just been saved without the speedpaint, I mean sure, it's like 9 (or something like 17 seconds if we're counting the end.) seconds, but who cares? Or if it needed that speedpaint aspect, why not just animate the IDEA of speed painting? Example of what I'm talking about is if the final product has a ocean in the background, the animator should draw rain or water being poured down to fill exactly what the final picture looks like.At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
But either way, the audio is copyrighted. It's a song by King Gizzard. Hope you don't mind me flagging it as "MUSIC".
that audio is not copyrighted bud
Really? I've read the album containing the song was released by ATO Records? https://www.discogs.com/release/29415718-King-Gizzard-And-The-Lizard-Wizard-Nonagon-Infinity Did the label deliberately put it on public domain?
On the label's website we can read about licensing. Licensing is possible only when the owner holds copyrights over something.
At 4/25/24 01:10 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/25/24 01:08 AM, tox wrote:At 4/24/24 11:50 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/24/24 10:49 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/24/24 10:10 PM, Czyszy wrote:I just basically reported it for speedpaint. Unless Tom says it's okay, I just don't like this kind of smartass-ery. It could've just been saved without the speedpaint, I mean sure, it's like 9 (or something like 17 seconds if we're counting the end.) seconds, but who cares? Or if it needed that speedpaint aspect, why not just animate the IDEA of speed painting? Example of what I'm talking about is if the final product has a ocean in the background, the animator should draw rain or water being poured down to fill exactly what the final picture looks like.At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
But either way, the audio is copyrighted. It's a song by King Gizzard. Hope you don't mind me flagging it as "MUSIC".
that audio is not copyrighted bud
Really? I've read the album containing the song was released by ATO Records? https://www.discogs.com/release/29415718-King-Gizzard-And-The-Lizard-Wizard-Nonagon-Infinity Did the label deliberately put it on public domain?
you linked directly to the music label company that put the audio out 7 years ago
no copyright on that audio, no description information, "official audio"
it's not copyrighted
At 4/25/24 01:16 AM, tox wrote:At 4/25/24 01:10 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/25/24 01:08 AM, tox wrote:At 4/24/24 11:50 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/24/24 10:49 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 4/24/24 10:10 PM, Czyszy wrote:I just basically reported it for speedpaint. Unless Tom says it's okay, I just don't like this kind of smartass-ery. It could've just been saved without the speedpaint, I mean sure, it's like 9 (or something like 17 seconds if we're counting the end.) seconds, but who cares? Or if it needed that speedpaint aspect, why not just animate the IDEA of speed painting? Example of what I'm talking about is if the final product has a ocean in the background, the animator should draw rain or water being poured down to fill exactly what the final picture looks like.At 4/24/24 08:20 PM, YendorNG wrote:Submitter is testing us... is this considered a speedpaint?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927389
It's definitely a bait of some sort.
But either way, the audio is copyrighted. It's a song by King Gizzard. Hope you don't mind me flagging it as "MUSIC".
that audio is not copyrighted bud
Really? I've read the album containing the song was released by ATO Records? https://www.discogs.com/release/29415718-King-Gizzard-And-The-Lizard-Wizard-Nonagon-Infinity Did the label deliberately put it on public domain?
you linked directly to the music label company that put the audio out 7 years ago
no copyright on that audio, no description information, "official audio"
it's not copyrighted
Well that's weird. I mean, the label mentions licensing on their website. I mean, it must be for a reason?
Maybe snotrat purchased a license to use KG&tLW music from ATO, but I highly doubt it.
That's my 2 cents. If my flag is rejected, that's cool. I hope that didn't get me any negative whistle points. Copyrights and licensing can be confusing. ;)
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927402 (NSFW)
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927403 (NSFW)
No animation.
No animation
Comic dub over static images
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/927489 (NSFW)
Comic dub over static images
The short clip of a phone screenshot gives me the suspicion that this is stolen - recommend investigating further.
he/they - pretty cool guy
