Regarding this whole conversation over the last few pages over this video:
From what I understand, it’s an author-created song with an author-created visualiser.
I appreciate there was uncertainty regarding the original rule which was likely prepared for stock visualisers as they’re very easy to produce videos for. If the author started to upload multiple songs with their same custom-made visualiser it would not be allowed, however it would be subject to a different submission rule.
I don’t think anybody is being “gas-lit” and likewise people don’t appreciate being called gas-lighters. I also don’t think the “Tom’s site, Tom’s rules” argument acknowledges the content’s retention.
Ultimately that video is now sitting at a below 3 score, which I think is pretty harsh given that I always found Newgrounds is intended to promote user-made content such as this one. Regardless of who you think is the loser in this argument, it is the content-creator that is taking the hit.
