At 2/15/24 12:07 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Fuck! Gamejunkie's got some 'splainin' to do!
Over-excitement. The conversation may have been heading that way, but we'll see what comes of it soon. :)
At 2/15/24 12:07 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Fuck! Gamejunkie's got some 'splainin' to do!At 2/14/24 08:04 AM, gamejunkie wrote:To all & sundry. Let it be known that from this day forward, our illustrious Leader has stated that 'GoAnimate' stuff is now on the chopping board for Flagging.
Sorry, what's to explain?
The EGB is for reporting Movies & Games, so I expected everyone would understand that Flagging of GoAnimate stuff here applied to Movies.
I guess I could have made that clearer, my apologies.
But this was Tom's comment re: GoAnimate Movies.
'I struggle with these a bit but I don't know if I've ever seen a particularly good GoAnimate movie... It's probably best to just remove those. GMod still has potential for quality works, depending on who is using it.'
Just don't go searching out old GoAnimate submissions, the new policy started yesterday so it only counts for submissions uploaded from yesterday onwards. DO NOT go on a Flagging spree on old content.
(warning: fetish content i guess)
.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918144
Gameplay footage from Bimbo Blaster. https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/900959
At 2/15/24 06:46 AM, freaks-heart wrote:(warning: fetish content i guess)
.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918144
Gameplay footage from Bimbo Blaster. https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/900959
Another submission by the same user. NSFW forewarning.
Gine TF which is an animation named Gine Ozaru by Piterkai. It's locked behind a Patreon paywall, but there's also teasers on the creator's DeviantArt. Here's some links for reference:
Unrelated to my report here and it isn't my intention to fire shots at any authority here (I keep my anarchistic behavior here to a minimum if I can help it), but I feel like the whole approach to revealing the new criteria surrounding GoAnimate could have been done a lot better.
Rather than just a simple announcement, follow up responses to user questions, and having to point out the obvious and stating it isn't open season on that medium as of yet, I feel like y'all should have waited until the said discussions regarding this have concluded and everyone was on the same page. Because to me it just seems like there's a bit of minor disarray going on with.
Then from there doing a big, organized post containing all the information and criteria that was important to the case at hand.
... I guess it isn't the biggest deal ever, but if we're trying to keep an organized thing going on that's just my two cents... and what I would have done personally.
I will remind everyone that things posted to the EGB are based on the realm of inquiry first and flag second. It has always been this way, it will ALWAYS be this way
The movie guidelines have not changed yet to include descriptions about (easy mode) animation programs, if you get dinged for false flags then that's on you
The EGB is for content based on the movies and games portal.... Not the art portal, not the bbs, not the review space, not the audio portal, not user pages, not CNN, not your fridge... Movies and games portals
I realllllly don't understand why people would go to the art portal and start flagging things based on exedor's comments, from something they read here
Comments and critiques of ANY EGB member are discouraged, this is our club, we have a proven track record. Don't like it? click the little X square in the top right of the screen and go enjoy something else for a while
Splatoon gameplay footage
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918178 (NSFW)
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918179 (NSFW)
Both of these uses stolen porn animation but the second also uses IRL porn footage.
At 2/15/24 07:52 AM, onyx wrote:Unrelated to my report here and it isn't my intention to fire shots at any authority here (I keep my anarchistic behavior here to a minimum if I can help it), but I feel like the whole approach to revealing the new criteria surrounding GoAnimate could have been done a lot better.
I've already apologized for not making it perfectly clear re: GoAnimate Movie unpublishing.
I feel like y'all should have waited until the said discussions regarding this have concluded.
It had concluded. The discussion was between myself & Tom in the Moderators Forum. I asked the question, he anwered the question. That was the end of the discussion. He stated categorically 'just delete them'.
Then from there doing a big, organized post containing all the information and criteria that was important to the case at hand.
That needed to be done, because it seemed not everyone understood fully.
Speedpaint timelapse footage
Fucking Elmo's World
Original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3B4XTHlSgo
Also, I wanna throw an accusation out on this user. I think there's a high likely chance that this guy is using 5+ separate accounts to spam these random stolen movies. This is like the 4th submission I've seen with stolen footage from a children's TV show where the description is a link to one random NG account with Lucas in the name and a similarly named title. It's very likely these are all from the same person trying to ban evade or something.
Gameplay "footage," and I put that in quotations as there's not much happening on the screen. But it is just a recording of the MiP App within the Stacking Minigame. Some links for reference:
At 2/15/24 09:11 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:I think there's a high likely chance that this guy is using 5+ separate accounts to spam these random stolen movies.
Lucas is the NG user equivalent of the definition of insanity. Probably thinks he's so sneaky too and whatnot.
At 2/15/24 04:28 PM, gamejunkie wrote:It had concluded. The discussion was between myself & Tom in the Moderators Forum.
I was also keeping in mind what Exedor said with "Discussions among the moderators and admins are not complete yet. We'll fill you in when things are decided," so that's what gave me the impression of things still going on behind the scenes.
But alright.
This appears to be an advertisement for freecreditreport.com - flag or no?
At 2/16/24 09:13 PM, antmaster208 wrote:At 2/16/24 08:01 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:This appears to be an advertisement for freecreditreport.com - flag or no?
its an old internet meme. it can stay
Some memes are just too low-effort and/or cringe to deserve to stay. Some use copyrighted music without permission.
Admits that he's not the original creator. This is a HyperCam recording of Drunk Flies.
NSFW warning. There's some real porn in this submission. Actually, a lot of it.
Music visualizer
No animation - live action
A Koopa's Revenge 2 gameplay footage
No animation - black screen, with music stolen from MDK:
Here's a video of an adorable cat.
Not appropriate for the portal, though.
Reuploading blammed content
Live action; no animation elements. This was actually shown off here last day too - I think BlueMonday1984 brought it up on their post and it got unpublished. Was resubmitted today though; the only difference is that the first introduction sequence has been cut.
At 2/17/24 12:33 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918392
No animation - live action
I think this was it too... wish there was a way to double check. Unless there is, and I'm not familiar with it.
Week 3 stuff restored HTML5 version of:
Week 3 stuff restored SWF version of:
a stolen clip from Chicken Run
It's another one of those "lucas" sockpuppets
Judging by the submission titles and the user's art page they might simply submit whetever they have lying around and use the movie portal as an advertising banner for their fetish requests!
Still image. No animation
At 2/18/24 07:41 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918603
a stolen clip from Chicken Run
It's another one of those "lucas" sockpuppets
And now with more Elmo's World
At 2/17/24 12:33 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918411
Music visualizer
I unpublished it & unpublished it again when it was re-uploaded but since Tom republished it because the guy made the whole thing not just using a premade vizualiser, it's going to be allowed.
At 2/18/24 10:25 PM, gamejunkie wrote:At 2/17/24 12:33 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918411
Music visualizer
I unpublished it & unpublished it again when it was re-uploaded but since Tom republished it because the guy made the whole thing not just using a premade vizualiser, it's going to be allowed.
"Do not submit something that is merely a sound visualizer set to music, or a recording of your music project timeline. If you want to promote your song in the movie portal, it should be set to original animation like a proper music video; otherwise stick to the Audio Portal."
Note the "proper music video" part. Do I see a comma over there. Let's eat Grandpa!
Do also note it doesn't say "third party visualizer." If you made it yourself, it's not allowed:
At 2/18/24 10:28 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 2/18/24 10:25 PM, gamejunkie wrote:At 2/17/24 12:33 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918411
Music visualizer
I unpublished it & unpublished it again when it was re-uploaded but since Tom republished it because the guy made the whole thing not just using a premade vizualiser, it's going to be allowed.
"Do not submit something that is merely a sound visualizer set to music,
Tom gave this a pass. Nuff said. But, v0te however you will.
At 2/18/24 10:40 PM, Exedor wrote:At 2/18/24 10:28 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Tom gave this a pass. Nuff said. But, v0te however you will.At 2/18/24 10:25 PM, gamejunkie wrote:At 2/17/24 12:33 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/918411
Music visualizer
I unpublished it & unpublished it again when it was re-uploaded but since Tom republished it because the guy made the whole thing not just using a premade vizualiser, it's going to be allowed.
"Do not submit something that is merely a sound visualizer set to music,
Clear wording is clearly needed. Tell Tom it's an obvious double standard.
At 2/18/24 10:41 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Clear wording is clearly needed. Tell Tom it's an obvious double standard.
Here's the clear wording: Tom's site. Tom's rules. That's pretty clear, I think. :3
Again, vote however you like.
At 2/18/24 10:44 PM, Exedor wrote:At 2/18/24 10:41 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Clear wording is clearly needed. Tell Tom it's an obvious double standard.Here's the clear wording: Tom's site. Tom's rules. That's pretty clear, I think. :3
Again, vote however you like.
Tom would never make that lame excuse himself.
