At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Sorry I missed two seconds of animation. lol
Equestrian Space - Steel Symphony (newgrounds.com)
Music video with a Still image. No animation.
At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Mostly no animation. There's a small CGI model in the final 4 seconds. That's about it.
Not a good ratio.
At 11/25/23 11:06 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Mostly no animation. There's a small CGI model in the final 4 seconds. That's about it.
Not a good ratio.
I totally agree. Some people need to count to ten before posting. It would really stop people from looking foolish.
At 11/25/23 11:11 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:I totally agree. Some people need to count to ten before posting. It would really stop people from looking foolish.At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
YOU'RE the one who originally posted, foo.
At 11/26/23 12:26 AM, Exedor wrote:At 11/25/23 11:11 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:YOU'RE the one who originally posted, foo.I totally agree. Some people need to count to ten before posting. It would really stop people from looking foolish.At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
dude... shhh... he almost had it
all by himself too
At 11/26/23 12:26 AM, Exedor wrote:At 11/25/23 11:11 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:YOU'RE the one who originally posted, foo.I totally agree. Some people need to count to ten before posting. It would really stop people from looking foolish.At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
Some people around here get very angry for no reason. They should take a chill pill. Thats all I'm saying.
At 11/25/23 11:06 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Mostly no animation. There's a small CGI model in the final 4 seconds. That's about it.
Not a good ratio.
That is true, but it's still a blend of real footage and animation, so it's allowed under the current rules. That doesn't mean it should be protected or blammed; vote however you feel is appropriate. However, this would be an improper flag for "no animation" because there clearly is some animation.
This is just another example of why we need @DoctorStrongbad to be more descriptive with his reports, but we have been telling him this for years.
At 11/26/23 09:59 AM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 11:06 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Mostly no animation. There's a small CGI model in the final 4 seconds. That's about it.
Not a good ratio.
That is true, but it's still a blend of real footage and animation, so it's allowed under the current rules. That doesn't mean it should be protected or blammed; vote however you feel is appropriate. However, this would be an improper flag for "no animation" because there clearly is some animation.
This is just another example of why we need @DoctorStrongbad to be more descriptive with his reports, but we have been telling him this for years.
Does anybody notice that guthrie has been on my case for the last ten years. Dude never says good job or gives me a smiley face ever. Somebody explain, " you get more flies with honey than vinegar " to him.
Also.
Super Mario Flash (newgrounds.com)
Not the original author.
At 11/26/23 05:41 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:At 11/26/23 09:59 AM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 11:06 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Mostly no animation. There's a small CGI model in the final 4 seconds. That's about it.
Not a good ratio.
That is true, but it's still a blend of real footage and animation, so it's allowed under the current rules. That doesn't mean it should be protected or blammed; vote however you feel is appropriate. However, this would be an improper flag for "no animation" because there clearly is some animation.
This is just another example of why we need @DoctorStrongbad to be more descriptive with his reports, but we have been telling him this for years.
Does anybody notice that guthrie has been on my case for the last ten years. Dude never says good job or gives me a smiley face ever. Somebody explain, " you get more flies with honey than vinegar " to him.
Also.
Super Mario Flash (newgrounds.com)
Not the original author.
It is because you don't care about the EGB or its members, you show it every time you post a link to a rule violation and its irritating to more than just Guthrie
Our home is just one more place that you can +1
At 11/26/23 05:56 PM, tox wrote:At 11/26/23 05:41 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:At 11/26/23 09:59 AM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 11:06 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Mostly no animation. There's a small CGI model in the final 4 seconds. That's about it.
Not a good ratio.
That is true, but it's still a blend of real footage and animation, so it's allowed under the current rules. That doesn't mean it should be protected or blammed; vote however you feel is appropriate. However, this would be an improper flag for "no animation" because there clearly is some animation.
This is just another example of why we need @DoctorStrongbad to be more descriptive with his reports, but we have been telling him this for years.
Does anybody notice that guthrie has been on my case for the last ten years. Dude never says good job or gives me a smiley face ever. Somebody explain, " you get more flies with honey than vinegar " to him.
Also.
Super Mario Flash (newgrounds.com)
Not the original author.
It is because you don't care about the EGB or its members, you show it every time you post a link to a rule violation and its irritating to more than just Guthrie
Our home is just one more place that you can +1
Damn right on that, tox.
he/they - pretty cool guy
No animation, just an screenshot, then the capcut watermark appears and the rest of the video is an static, plain black Background.
Looped gif, nothing else. It's also stolen from there
Anyways, I been inactive from there as I got an 1-month long administration on Wikigrounds and I'm busy with that. Also I need to focus on my personal life and my studies which takes away more time.
I'll also try to make the reports longer and put real evidence
At 11/26/23 06:13 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 11/26/23 05:56 PM, tox wrote:At 11/26/23 05:41 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:At 11/26/23 09:59 AM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 11:06 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/25/23 10:53 PM, guthrie wrote:At 11/25/23 10:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:TYPO TEACHES TECHNOLOGY EP #1: DUST! (newgrounds.com)
no animation.
It's literally 18 seconds and you didn't even watch it. Stop posting these bullshit reports.
Mostly no animation. There's a small CGI model in the final 4 seconds. That's about it.
Not a good ratio.
That is true, but it's still a blend of real footage and animation, so it's allowed under the current rules. That doesn't mean it should be protected or blammed; vote however you feel is appropriate. However, this would be an improper flag for "no animation" because there clearly is some animation.
This is just another example of why we need @DoctorStrongbad to be more descriptive with his reports, but we have been telling him this for years.
Does anybody notice that guthrie has been on my case for the last ten years. Dude never says good job or gives me a smiley face ever. Somebody explain, " you get more flies with honey than vinegar " to him.
Also.
Super Mario Flash (newgrounds.com)
Not the original author.
It is because you don't care about the EGB or its members, you show it every time you post a link to a rule violation and its irritating to more than just Guthrie
Our home is just one more place that you can +1
Wow, I had no idea that you guys felt that way. Thanks for letting me know after ten years of trying to be helpful.
Damn right on that, tox.
Thanks, for kicking a guy when he is down.
NSFW Submission Pending Judgement.
This falls against the Movie Guidelines of submitting modified versions of other peoples' work. It's just the same animation but with new sound design thrown over it.
The user who submitted it also just signed up today, so chances of them being aware of this policy is slim-to-nill. Not to mention he tastelessly advertises a business e-mail at the end... on an altered piece of work he obviously didn't have consent to throw together and do solely for public exhibition. But going back on track...
Here's a link to the source to reference within your reports, which is also NSFW.
At 11/27/23 04:24 AM, onyx wrote:NSFW Submission Pending Judgement.
This falls against the Movie Guidelines of submitting modified versions of other peoples' work. It's just the same animation but with new sound design thrown over it.
The user who submitted it also just signed up today, so chances of them being aware of this policy is slim-to-nill. Not to mention he tastelessly advertises a business e-mail at the end... on an altered piece of work he obviously didn't have consent to throw together and do solely for public exhibition. But going back on track...
Here's a link to the source to reference within your reports, which is also NSFW.
Don't worry, I got this.
At 11/27/23 04:34 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/27/23 04:24 AM, onyx wrote:NSFW Submission Pending Judgement.
This falls against the Movie Guidelines of submitting modified versions of other peoples' work. It's just the same animation but with new sound design thrown over it.
The user who submitted it also just signed up today, so chances of them being aware of this policy is slim-to-nill. Not to mention he tastelessly advertises a business e-mail at the end... on an altered piece of work he obviously didn't have consent to throw together and do solely for public exhibition. But going back on track...
Here's a link to the source to reference within your reports, which is also NSFW.
Don't worry, I got this.
You know that you violated the review rules by doing that?
At 11/27/23 08:38 AM, tox wrote:At 11/27/23 04:34 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/27/23 04:24 AM, onyx wrote:NSFW Submission Pending Judgement.
This falls against the Movie Guidelines of submitting modified versions of other peoples' work. It's just the same animation but with new sound design thrown over it.
The user who submitted it also just signed up today, so chances of them being aware of this policy is slim-to-nill. Not to mention he tastelessly advertises a business e-mail at the end... on an altered piece of work he obviously didn't have consent to throw together and do solely for public exhibition. But going back on track...
Here's a link to the source to reference within your reports, which is also NSFW.
Don't worry, I got this.
You know that you violated the review rules by doing that?
Fair enough. Should I have messaged them directly?
Please DO NOT:
Make accusations in the review space. Flag the entry if you believe it is stolen or illegal.
Tell the author their content doesn't belong on Newgrounds. We will determine that.
Live action music video. No animation.
Original:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/908293 (NSFW)
Modded gameplay footage of Beat Banger
Original: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=7526706 (Very NSFW)
Stolen game. This game is common to see on Flash game pages, like this one:
At 11/27/23 02:29 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/908285
Live action music video. No animation.
he/they - pretty cool guy
Stolen https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/908285
real https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO7EtdR3Dyw it's a good thing shazam exists
At 11/27/23 08:53 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/27/23 08:38 AM, tox wrote:At 11/27/23 04:34 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 11/27/23 04:24 AM, onyx wrote:NSFW Submission Pending Judgement.
This falls against the Movie Guidelines of submitting modified versions of other peoples' work. It's just the same animation but with new sound design thrown over it.
The user who submitted it also just signed up today, so chances of them being aware of this policy is slim-to-nill. Not to mention he tastelessly advertises a business e-mail at the end... on an altered piece of work he obviously didn't have consent to throw together and do solely for public exhibition. But going back on track...
Here's a link to the source to reference within your reports, which is also NSFW.
Don't worry, I got this.
You know that you violated the review rules by doing that?
Fair enough. Should I have messaged them directly?
The mods don't really like that kind of business because that's their job, a light hearted heads up is alright but to go about and explain to them rules and regs is another
Usually, you may want to just flag the item and then in your flag description describe what you would like to see as the outcome of the flag to be, and if a mod agrees then they can reach out and assist the user
We don't really have the ability to see the big picture like a mod can
Geometry Dash gameplay footage
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/908300 (NSFW)
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/903947 (NSFW)
Found this that's pending judgement right now; submission solely consists of gameplay from Mario 64, which goes against Newgrounds' Movie Guidelines of submitting game footage. Granted I've just been skipping through it to see if there's anything else to note based on some previous reportings to make sure... but the video's like twenty minutes long, man.
Also the user just registered only a few days ago, so probably just a case of them not being familiar with the policies.
At 11/28/23 04:16 AM, onyx wrote:sm64 bloopers
Found this that's pending judgement right now; submission solely consists of gameplay from Mario 64, which goes against Newgrounds' Movie Guidelines of submitting game footage. Granted I've just been skipping through it to see if there's anything else to note based on some previous reportings to make sure... but the video's like twenty minutes long, man.
Also the user just registered only a few days ago, so probably just a case of them not being familiar with the policies.
Modded Friday Night Fuckin gameplay footage
Image slideshow. No animation
