HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
This is a stolen episode of:
The Mafia Dolls (Spanish: Las muñecas de la mafia), is a Colombian telenovela created by Andrés López
Getting slightly off topic: got a Silver Whistle today.
Special thanks to this place and the Audio Portal Cleanup thread for helping me get there.
At 8/15/23 05:41 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895292
No animation
It's really good you brought this up @BlueMonday1984, congratulations on your silver whistle! You are awesome!
ChrisomaticChaotix has 6 other movies that are made in Gmod: which have passed judgment, therefore presumably have been safeguarded for being within the guidelines: https://chrisomaticchaotix.newgrounds.com/movies
People can make really cool things in Gmod, it takes drive together with lots of training.
https://www.newgrounds.com/search/conduct/movies?sort=score-desc&match=tags&tags=gmod-animation
Please, I would like to be helpful. There are times when I am wrong. Hopefully, if I ever present information which is incorrect: it is good for other people to point that out, I will make sure to write that down. There are many situations that I have not dealt with.
Thank you, I am very happy you are on the team.
Comic dub over a static image with no animation
At 8/15/23 09:57 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 8/15/23 06:55 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895146
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895223
https://fpsblyck.newgrounds.com/
I have a very strong suspicion that this person is not the real FPSBlyck. This person is reuploading the submissions from the real Blyck except they put a Ko-Fi link over the original animation. That link is completely brand new and empty and was never referenced anywhere in the original Blyck's Twitter or animations. In addition, the real Blyck has an NSFW Patreon that this imposter does not link once.
I strongly believe this guy is an imposter trying to make money off the real person.
If you (or anyone here) can contact Blyck about this, that'd be helpful.
I can't message them on Twitter unless I pay Elon Musk that shitty subscription fee.
At 8/16/23 07:52 AM, Aalasteir wrote:At 8/15/23 05:41 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895292
No animation
It's really good you brought this up @BlueMonday1984, congratulations on your silver whistle! You are awesome!
ChrisomaticChaotix has 6 other movies that are made in Gmod: which have passed judgment, therefore presumably have been safeguarded for being within the guidelines: https://chrisomaticchaotix.newgrounds.com/movies
People can make really cool things in Gmod, it takes drive together with lots of training.
https://www.newgrounds.com/search/conduct/movies?sort=score-desc&match=tags&tags=gmod-animation
Please, I would like to be helpful. There are times when I am wrong. Hopefully, if I ever present information which is incorrect: it is good for other people to point that out, I will make sure to write that down. There are many situations that I have not dealt with.
Thank you, I am very happy you are on the team.
I have been told in the past that g-merd animations are not against the rules as long as they present as an animation or creative works and not as a gameplay mod that someone downloaded and is showing off the gameplay of because they thought it was cool
At 8/16/23 08:07 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:I can't message them on Twitter unless I pay Elon Musk that shitty subscription fee.
The minute I quit from Twitter, it gets even worse.
Okay scenario time:
Let's say there's several artworks User A posts. User B THEN posts review that's only one word in each of them. Are they violating the reviewing guidelines and if so, then in which catergory?
For my answer, I argue that it does because it violates this clause in the "Do Not" list:
Post large numbers of low quality / repetitively phrased reviews to boost your review count.
And the reviews is just one word so therefore it is a spam review that uses phrases repetitively.
At 8/16/23 09:17 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 8/16/23 08:07 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:I can't message them on Twitter unless I pay Elon Musk that shitty subscription fee.The minute I quit from Twitter, it gets even worse.
Okay scenario time:
Let's say there's several artworks User A posts. User B THEN posts review that's only one word in each of them. Are they violating the reviewing guidelines and if so, then in which catergory?
For my answer, I argue that it does because it violates this clause in the "Do Not" list:
And the reviews is just one word so therefore it is a spam review that uses phrases repetitively.
Where exactly have you seen that currently?
At 8/16/23 09:57 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Where exactly have you seen that currently?
Well, my 3 art submissions, namely "Jonathan's Adventure!: The 2nd Anniversa...", "Something seems FISHY about this...", and "Anime Yaoi-ish Furry Jonathan." But I didn't want to mention them directly because again, if my memory is correct, the board isn't for review flagging and neither do you see them popping up on this board as much as say Movie and/or Game submissions.
At 8/16/23 10:02 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 8/16/23 09:57 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Where exactly have you seen that currently?Well, my 3 art submissions, namely "Jonathan's Adventure!: The 2nd Anniversa...", "Something seems FISHY about this...", and "Anime Yaoi-ish Furry Jonathan." But I didn't want to mention them directly because again, if my memory is correct, the board isn't for review flagging and neither do you see them popping up on this board as much as say Movie and/or Game submissions.
Fair enough. Would you flag them the same way if they were all 5 star reviews?
At 8/16/23 10:03 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Fair enough. Would you flag them the same way if they were all 5 star reviews?
Yes, because even if I gotten 5 stars for it, an review that violates the guidelines is still a review that is acceptable to be flagged, regardless if the submission gets those stars or not. To not flag them despite them violating the guidelines is a direct dishonor and disgrace to the EGB's conduct.
@BlueMonday1984, is this the same person? Did they reupload a blammed movie?
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/387319/1926#bbspost27747834_post_text
The amogus potion.
Stolen from:
Arcade Craniacs purchased the among us potion from the dark web!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LChInJR4NFQ
Stolen Tiktok meme clip. The meme question:
𝕄𝕖𝕝𝕠𝕟 𝕞𝕖𝕝𝕠𝕟 𝕞𝕖𝕝𝕠𝕟 𝕖𝕩𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕖 𝕞𝕖𝕝𝕠𝕟 𝕞𝕖𝕞𝕖
At 8/15/23 06:55 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895146
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895223
https://fpsblyck.newgrounds.com/
I have a very strong suspicion that this person is not the real FPSBlyck. This person is reuploading the submissions from the real Blyck except they put a Ko-Fi link over the original animation. That link is completely brand new and empty and was never referenced anywhere in the original Blyck's Twitter or animations. In addition, the real Blyck has an NSFW Patreon that this imposter does not link once.
I strongly believe this guy is an imposter trying to make money off the real person.
They are now linking to their own Patreon account that's impersonating the real Blyck. At this point, it's safe to say that this guy is a fake.
At 8/16/23 05:34 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:At 8/15/23 06:55 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895146https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895354
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895223
https://fpsblyck.newgrounds.com/
I have a very strong suspicion that this person is not the real FPSBlyck. This person is reuploading the submissions from the real Blyck except they put a Ko-Fi link over the original animation. That link is completely brand new and empty and was never referenced anywhere in the original Blyck's Twitter or animations. In addition, the real Blyck has an NSFW Patreon that this imposter does not link once.
I strongly believe this guy is an imposter trying to make money off the real person.
They are now linking to their own Patreon account that's impersonating the real Blyck. At this point, it's safe to say that this guy is a fake.
I've emailed support - the account should be banned pretty quickly.
I think that you will want to check your sources on this
they had this material back in 2019 under the right name and everything
adult https://twitter.com/B1yck/status/1203734788642889728?s=20
At 8/16/23 08:46 PM, tox wrote:@BlueMonday1984
@Pokemonpoeguygcn
I think that you will want to check your sources on this
they had this material back in 2019 under the right name and everything
adult https://twitter.com/B1yck/status/1203734788642889728?s=20
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895287
That's not the point I'm trying to make. The issue is that the Newgrounds user is not the same person as the original author. It's someone else that just took the name and are trying to profit by reuploading their work. Notice how the Patreon link on the Twitter post is completely different from the one linked on the Newgrounds user.
At 8/16/23 09:23 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:At 8/16/23 08:46 PM, tox wrote:
it dosent matter anymore lol
they are gooooooneeee!
no more adult material from/for them
Okay, three submissions:
This one's an Adult submission, the submission is a speedpaint video.
The submission has improper ratings, the original rating is E despite blood appearing at 1:45.
The submission has no animation, it is a slideshow video.
At 8/16/23 10:35 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:Okay, three submissions:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895466
This one's an Adult submission, the submission is a speedpaint video.
Flagged.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895450
The submission has improper ratings, the original rating is E despite blood appearing at 1:45.
Flagged. Still a decent submission otherwise,
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895443
The submission has no animation, it is a slideshow video.
It appears to follow some sort of story, even if it seems to be in Russian.
I'd prefer to let the v0ting system decide.
The impersonator is back.
WARNING. Adult material in this link: .https://dolphy1o.newgrounds.com/movies
How should this be handled?
AI Animation
Over-dependent on a computer doing the bulk of creative work.
This is the byproduct of text inputs. Then he uploaded the result.
At 8/17/23 06:03 AM, Aalasteir wrote:@Pokemonpoeguygcn
The impersonator is back.
WARNING. Adult material in this link: .https://dolphy1o.newgrounds.com/movies
Can you please provide some context?
At 8/17/23 07:16 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 8/17/23 06:03 AM, Aalasteir wrote:@PokemonpoeguygcnCan you please provide some context?
The impersonator is back.
WARNING. Adult material in this link: .https://dolphy1o.newgrounds.com/movies
Okay, so a couple of days ago, there's a guy who was impersonating a Twitter artist named FPSblyck while he posted blyck's content over there. Eventually, he got banned and yet there's another guy who's uploading stolen content, which in my opinion, wouldn't be the same guy. I mean sure, there's not much people we know that would upload blyck's content into NG, but that doesn't necessarily mean it must be the same impersonator.
At 8/17/23 07:16 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 8/17/23 06:03 AM, Aalasteir wrote:@PokemonpoeguygcnCan you please provide some context?
The impersonator is back.
WARNING. Adult material in this link: .https://dolphy1o.newgrounds.com/movies
I agree with you @BickerySebastian.
@Pokemonpoeguygcn found someone impersonating FPSBlyck.
Someone is taking videos from the real FPSBlyck. Then puts a link in the description in hopes of enticing coomers to give the Imposter money.
Recent example:
WARNING. Adult material in this link: .https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895482
Stolen most likely from a reupload site:
WARNING. Adult material in this link: .https://www.patreon.com/FPSBlyck
Overwatch | Widowmaker | 1080p (Patreon)
Render_Widowmaker_39_v1 Watermarked_1.mp4
Gameplay footage of Super Mario Maker 2
Example:
Super Mario Maker 2 - All Toad Power-Ups -- 14:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qYNJNLVQ6Q
ROBLOX gameplay footage
Seems like a video of some kid showing his pubes on video. Don't watch this. https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/895553
