HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
Speedpaint.
RuneScape. Let's Play Video.
At 8/8/23 03:43 PM, Aalasteir wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894471
Speedpaint.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894485
RuneScape. Let's Play Video.
Did they really get deleted by moderators this quickly? 24 minutes?
At 8/8/23 04:09 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 03:43 PM, Aalasteir wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894471
Speedpaint.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894485
RuneScape. Let's Play Video.
Did they really get deleted by moderators this quickly? 24 minutes?
Mods are on the ball right now
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
At 8/8/23 08:40 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:32 PM, MalwareShop wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894510
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
I think a Mod mentioned Tom gave a pass on a similar video by the same user. Likely Tom will bend the rules for this one too.
But it's jut real life footage. How is it not against the rules?
At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:43 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:40 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:32 PM, MalwareShop wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894510
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
I think a Mod mentioned Tom gave a pass on a similar video by the same user. Likely Tom will bend the rules for this one too.
But it's jut real life footage. How is it not against the rules?
To quote @Exedor:
So uh, leave it alone?
I know it's Tom's site, but my question was not rhetorical.
At 8/8/23 08:53 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:48 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:43 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:40 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:32 PM, MalwareShop wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894510
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
I think a Mod mentioned Tom gave a pass on a similar video by the same user. Likely Tom will bend the rules for this one too.
But it's jut real life footage. How is it not against the rules?
To quote @Exedor:
So uh, leave it alone?
I know it's Tom's site, but my question was not rhetorical.
I summon @tomfulp: Regarding toonhole's latest live action video, shall we effect the rules of the portal and flag it, or shall it stay per yours, and at the will of the NewGrounds' population?
Man, I don't have any "rules." I was just simply asking why it's not against the rules, if some real life footages are against the rules, but this one is not. You don't really seem to like me at all though.
At 8/8/23 09:10 PM, YendorNG wrote:Yes, the video IS against the rules. HOWEVER, based on a statement by moderator Exedor for Toonhole's previous submission --it is likely Tom will allow it to stay despite any whistle blown.
And then a frog will yell it's hogwash.
At 8/8/23 09:10 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:55 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:53 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:48 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:43 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:40 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:32 PM, MalwareShop wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894510
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
I think a Mod mentioned Tom gave a pass on a similar video by the same user. Likely Tom will bend the rules for this one too.
But it's jut real life footage. How is it not against the rules?
To quote @Exedor:
So uh, leave it alone?
I know it's Tom's site, but my question was not rhetorical.
I summon @tomfulp: Regarding toonhole's latest live action video, shall we effect the rules of the portal and flag it, or shall it stay per yours, and at the will of the NewGrounds' population?
Man, I don't have any "rules." I was just simply asking why it's not against the rules, if some real life footages are against the rules, but this one is not. You don't really seem to like me at all though.At 8/8/23 08:55 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:53 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:48 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:43 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:40 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:32 PM, MalwareShop wrote:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894510
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
I think a Mod mentioned Tom gave a pass on a similar video by the same user. Likely Tom will bend the rules for this one too.
But it's jut real life footage. How is it not against the rules?
To quote @Exedor:
So uh, leave it alone?
I know it's Tom's site, but my question was not rhetorical.
I summon @tomfulp: Regarding toonhole's latest live action video, shall we effect the rules of the portal and flag it, or shall it stay per yours, and at the will of the NewGrounds' population?
Man, I don't have any "rules." I was just simply asking why it's not against the rules, if some real life footages are against the rules, but this one is not. You don't really seem to like me at all though.
Being formally homeless I am predispositioned to not like people and can seem defensive. I am trying to change that but PTSD is a bitch and she wants to continuously fuck me at every opportunity. Don't take it personally. I have no interest in hurting your feelings, I'm just trying to direct you based on previous observations and I don't feel I am getting through, and I think that is where the frustration lies. Thus I am having to bring the other people involved in the decision to keep the video.
But let's examine your question:
Yes, the video IS against the rules. HOWEVER, based on a statement by moderator Exedor for Toonhole's previous submission --it is likely Tom will allow it to stay despite any whistle blown.
Ah man, I'm so sorry about your PTSD. On 2022, may 17, I also got traumatized, when I was almost attacked by 2 older guys on the streets alone. No offence taken, I hope your life will get much better. Take care man, peace.
Hmmm if some times Tom Fulp bends the rules for certain "no animation" submissions then why are people reporting no animation submissions? is it because majority of no animation is like a repost from youtube or somewhere on social media.
Pfft hate won't hurt me
At 8/8/23 10:56 PM, SkProductions wrote:Hmmm if some times Tom Fulp bends the rules for certain "no animation" submissions then why are people reporting no animation submissions? is it because majority of no animation is like a repost from youtube or somewhere on social media.
You answered it yourself: "sometimes Tom Fulp bends the rules for certain "no animation" submissions"
I will also point to this wisdom:
At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:To quote @Exedor:Tom's site. Tom's prerogative.
The fact of the matter is this: the only thing that makes Newgrounds any different from any other video hosting site out there is that Newgrounds focuses on animations and shuns live action content. There are animations on youtube. There are live video sites everywhere. Newgrounds' edge is its animated content. Do you want Newgrounds to remain special, or same as everyone else?
At 8/8/23 11:32 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/8/23 10:56 PM, SkProductions wrote:Hmmm if some times Tom Fulp bends the rules for certain "no animation" submissions then why are people reporting no animation submissions? is it because majority of no animation is like a repost from youtube or somewhere on social media.You answered it yourself: "sometimes Tom Fulp bends the rules for certain "no animation" submissions"
I will also point to this wisdom:At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:
To quote @Exedor:Tom's site. Tom's prerogative.
There's also the upcoming Live Action Jam.
The "no animation" rule is really there to filter out no-effort submissions that are better suited for youtube. Exceptions are often made for videos where it's obvious that the creator actually spent time and effort making something that's relevant to the community.
At 8/8/23 11:45 PM, guthrie wrote:There's also the upcoming Live Action Jam.
Ugh. >.<
The "no animation" rule is really there to filter out no-effort submissions that are better suited for youtube. Exceptions are often made for videos where it's obvious that the creator actually spent time and effort making something that's relevant to the community.
True; heavily altered ones, like this one.
At 8/8/23 08:53 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:48 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:43 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:40 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:32 PM, MalwareShop wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894510
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
I think a Mod mentioned Tom gave a pass on a similar video by the same user. Likely Tom will bend the rules for this one too.
But it's jut real life footage. How is it not against the rules?
To quote @Exedor:
So uh, leave it alone?
I know it's Tom's site, but my question was not rhetorical.
I summon @tomfulp: Regarding toonhole's latest live action video, shall we effect the rules of the portal and flag it, or shall it stay per yours, and at the will of the NewGrounds' population?
It's in a grey area because we generally remove timelapse art videos but because it has a structured commentary, is entertaining and is about the creative process, it feels like it would be wrong to remove them.
The goal is to eventually allow timelapse videos alongside art pieces in the Art Portal, at which point maybe these videos would reside alongside the art pieces they are about. Until then, they've been getting a pass in the movies portal.
At 8/8/23 11:45 PM, guthrie wrote:At 8/8/23 11:32 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/8/23 10:56 PM, SkProductions wrote:Hmmm if some times Tom Fulp bends the rules for certain "no animation" submissions then why are people reporting no animation submissions? is it because majority of no animation is like a repost from youtube or somewhere on social media.You answered it yourself: "sometimes Tom Fulp bends the rules for certain "no animation" submissions"
I will also point to this wisdom:At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:
To quote @Exedor:Tom's site. Tom's prerogative.
There's also the upcoming Live Action Jam.
The "no animation" rule is really there to filter out no-effort submissions that are better suited for youtube. Exceptions are often made for videos where it's obvious that the creator actually spent time and effort making something that's relevant to the community.
This was useful, thanks.
At 8/9/23 07:17 AM, TomFulp wrote:At 8/8/23 08:53 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:48 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:46 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:43 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/8/23 08:40 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 8/8/23 08:32 PM, MalwareShop wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894510
Is this submission against the rules of the video portal?
I think a Mod mentioned Tom gave a pass on a similar video by the same user. Likely Tom will bend the rules for this one too.
But it's jut real life footage. How is it not against the rules?
To quote @Exedor:
So uh, leave it alone?
I know it's Tom's site, but my question was not rhetorical.
I summon @tomfulp: Regarding toonhole's latest live action video, shall we effect the rules of the portal and flag it, or shall it stay per yours, and at the will of the NewGrounds' population?
It's in a grey area because we generally remove timelapse art videos but because it has a structured commentary, is entertaining and is about the creative process, it feels like it would be wrong to remove them.
The goal is to eventually allow timelapse videos alongside art pieces in the Art Portal, at which point maybe these videos would reside alongside the art pieces they are about. Until then, they've been getting a pass in the movies portal.
Hello Tom, I grew up on your games as a kid, I didn't think I would ever send a message to you.
Music with no animation
Reuploading blammed content under a new account
Originals:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/893545
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/893810
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/893960
Reuploading blammed content
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/894475
Stolen
https://www.mostfungames.com/pucca-funny-love.htm
Stolen
Clip stolen from:
Симбочка - Под Окошком
Videos get sent to the portal when their scores are too low. But what about images? Do they just get deleted if they have low scores?
At 8/9/23 06:52 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Videos get sent to the portal when their scores are too low. But what about images? Do they just get deleted if they have low scores?
Are you referring to the art portal? If so, there's no judgment process there - the scouting system is in place instead. So, art submissions keep accumulating their votes however good or bad it is.
At 8/9/23 06:55 PM, guthrie wrote:At 8/9/23 06:52 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Videos get sent to the portal when their scores are too low. But what about images? Do they just get deleted if they have low scores?
Are you referring to the art portal? If so, there's no judgment process there - the scouting system is in place instead. So, art submissions keep accumulating their votes however good or bad it is.
So art images cannot be blammed? Tox tried explaining to me what scouting is exactly, but I don't quite get the hang of it. If I remember correctly, it's about upvoting high quality images and stuff, or something like that.
At 8/9/23 06:57 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Tox tried explaining to me what scouting is exactly, but I don't quite get the hang of it. If I remember correctly, it's about upvoting high quality images and stuff, or something like that.
You should read @Ornery's news post about scouting. It should answer all of the questions you have about the system.
At 8/9/23 07:12 PM, FilmCutterClock wrote:At 8/9/23 06:57 PM, MalwareShop wrote:At 8/9/23 06:55 PM, guthrie wrote:At 8/9/23 06:52 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Videos get sent to the portal when their scores are too low. But what about images? Do they just get deleted if they have low scores?
Are you referring to the art portal? If so, there's no judgment process there - the scouting system is in place instead. So, art submissions keep accumulating their votes however good or bad it is.
So art images cannot be blammed? Tox tried explaining to me what scouting is exactly, but I don't quite get the hang of it. If I remember correctly, it's about upvoting high quality images and stuff, or something like that.
sorry-i-buy-to-chips-want? That's what it sounds like to me when I read this.
What do you mean? Why?
no animation
no animation, copyright material, same user.
Adult Material rated as M
warning: explicit
Is ear rape allowed?
At 8/9/23 08:46 PM, Kehmicle wrote:Is ear rape allowed?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/894638
Surprisingly (to me, at least), screamers/ear rape are not against the rules. But there's almost no chance this survives judgment, so don't worry too much about it.
At 8/9/23 07:02 PM, guthrie wrote:At 8/9/23 06:57 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Tox tried explaining to me what scouting is exactly, but I don't quite get the hang of it. If I remember correctly, it's about upvoting high quality images and stuff, or something like that.
You should read @Ornery's news post about scouting. It should answer all of the questions you have about the system.
https://ornery.newgrounds.com/news/post/388624
At 8/9/23 07:02 PM, guthrie wrote:At 8/9/23 06:57 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Tox tried explaining to me what scouting is exactly, but I don't quite get the hang of it. If I remember correctly, it's about upvoting high quality images and stuff, or something like that.
Not quite. Voting has nothing to do with scouting. Don't "upvote" or "downvote." Vote what you feel the submission deserves. The exception is when you see a red title amongst the purple Under Judgement submissions, which means it's about to be blammed. Throw a 0 its way and remove some trash from the Portal, while getting yourself a blam point earned for your effort.
You should read Ornery's news post about scouting. It should answer all of the questions you have about the system.
And if not, lemme know.
At 8/9/23 08:58 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Is this allowed on Newgrounds?
Vote 0 and find out.
At 8/9/23 09:24 PM, Exedor wrote:At 8/9/23 07:02 PM, guthrie wrote:At 8/9/23 06:57 PM, MalwareShop wrote:Tox tried explaining to me what scouting is exactly, but I don't quite get the hang of it. If I remember correctly, it's about upvoting high quality images and stuff, or something like that.
You should read @Ornery's news post about scouting. It should answer all of the questions you have about the system.
https://ornery.newgrounds.com/news/post/388624
Huh? How did you do this? This is just an empty reply.
