And that's it. The user is also gone. Thanks again.
And that's it. The user is also gone. Thanks again.
A question to Commanders: What do we do with "shitposts" that are clearly spam and not simply low quality, but are not in the spam category? Help drive them to the obits, or any specific form of report?
Submission guidelines:
Do not submit low quality entries with the intent to give users "free blam points."
Examples below. At least they're tagged shitpost, I guess...
(The latter also is a bit disturbing since we have unsuspecting minors - and adults - browsing the site who might fall for it if there is actual data collection involved.)
At 10/12/21 11:04 AM, DeepCrimson wrote:What do we do with "shitposts" that are clearly spam and not simply low quality, but are not in the spam category?
Whatever category something is in, always vote based on the content. Sometimes, a "shitpost" isn't. Sometimes, an "Epic Submission" isn't.
Submission guidelines:
These guidelines allow us to act against users who need action taken against them. However, if we remove every crap submission, no one would get Blam points, and it negates the need for a voting system. Also, users get a short, temporary ban automatically via the system when they get multiple submissions blammed. That doesn't happen when they get mod removed.
(The latter also is a bit disturbing since we have unsuspecting minors - and adults - browsing the site who might fall for it if there is actual data collection involved.)
Asking for personal info isn't cool. Maybe goes nowhere, but maybe not. Removed.
Thanks for the clarification on this kind of content, Commander Exedor. Potential personal data collection material (that isn't an obvious joke) to be filed as spam then? Noted.
Yeah, don't worry, this soldier still remembers the teachings by DM about overblamming as well as excessive reporting. But I guess fellow officers can benefit from this information as well. Thanks for taking the time to highlight this once again!
Did Nickelodeon copyright that one? First posted in 2002. Not the author's submission.
Filed with full details to save the NG moderation team a bit of time.
At 10/11/21 03:07 PM, drizzile wrote:idk what's up with these submissions having an empty flash version, this has been going on for months now. have you ever adressed this, @tomfulp ?
Here's another one, by the way.
#818187: Empty project including the mp4.
http://uploads.ungrounded.net/alternate/1766000/1766229_alternate_157844.mp4
Three findings in one.
Fake PJ Masks "official" account posting a fake music video.
Its only fan is a dead obvious porn spam account.
@Exedor: Requesting a wipe on both once confirmed please, Commander. Thanks!
Might want to check on the "fans" of said fan too. They seem to be rather new accounts.
#818201: User did not create nor add anything to this video.
#815213: Untouched repost of Clicker Ultimate. While open source, still not the user's own submission.
This seems to be more "Adult", rather than "Mature".
At 10/13/21 04:33 AM, Lizzardis wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/818238
This seems to be more "Adult", rather than "Mature".
Again, same thing. Should be Adult, instead of Mature.
At 10/12/21 02:59 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/818180
#818180: Misrated.
Rated E for Everyone, by the way, since it has passed judgment. Unless you see something explicit in there?
818246: Stolen, added Cartoon Network watermark and edited outro.
Original
At 10/13/21 06:38 AM, drizzile wrote:At 10/13/21 06:34 AM, DeepCrimson wrote:undetailed breast expansion. this is a teen rating at the very least.At 10/12/21 02:59 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/818180Rated E for Everyone, by the way, since it has passed judgment. Unless you see something explicit in there?
#818180: Misrated.
Mkay, thanks. Fixed.
#818247: Gameplay footage. Description doesn't matter when it comes to double-checking content.
#818248: See Anonymous-Frog's report above for #818246. I'm way too old for a "Lordy, I hope there are tapes" joke.
Do we have newer rules on stealth edits of reviews for personal attacks in obits as well as submission author reviews?
Also checking if NG moderation team has full access to edit history as this is the easiest form of abuse and confusion.
Just making sure since those cannot be flagged. Thanks!
Edit: Newer as in, well, anything within the last ten years or so that isn't already in the guidelines.
Didn't expect this piece of shit to pass judgement. Yall owe me a blam point
Original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zo4ch_dk6UA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFPqJ9Vjh08
This child is stealing the Raft Wars game yet again with what I believe to be his 3rd account now.
EDIT: Actually, his 6th account, give or take
I don't keep track of B/P points here. If I wanted to get to Sup. Commander, level 60 or promote the whistle directly to Deity, the API tends to have issues understanding queries at times and it's not always easy to diagnose even by looking at the outcome. No need to stress yourself over this, Commander Pokemonpoeguygcn; keep fighting the good fight!
Remember Tom can just wipe all of us and the cosmetic stats, staff included, at any time with a mere SQL query if he feels like it. Or Thanos snap, if I got that reference right, heh.
Back to duty! *salutes*
Edit: Reported the guy who disrespected you as a POC that @TomFulp (gets mentioned so much he has it disabled) still has many, many things to fix even 25 years later.
Quick check on those two. Thanks!
Title is a bit confusing. As for content, no link to subscribe to and author's account is fresh. Doesn't mean they did anything wrong if it's their own content, though - I suppose the how to subscribe part in the second one is acceptable.
Any differences between those two or duplicates with a mere title change? (Not very subtle.)
#818278: Speedpaint.
What do we do with this kind of stuff, Commanders?
#818293: Misrated, that's A, not E. (Adult warning.)
At 10/13/21 04:26 PM, drizzile wrote:an entire account created to harass some rando. we gotta calm the kiddies down around here
oh hate accounts can be brought up on here?
Octillery Social Credit Test DX | Octillery VS Collection
You ever take a rat...cut it open, stick your pee pee in, let it live? You remind me of that rat.
At 10/13/21 04:36 PM, drizzile wrote:At 10/13/21 04:33 PM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:At 10/13/21 04:26 PM, drizzile wrote:an entire account created to harass some rando. we gotta calm the kiddies down around hereoh hate accounts can be brought up on here?
@octillery2hater
sorry to be a party-shitter joey, but antipicofan was made to target a specific user. whatever the hell you linked is obviously a troll account (probably yours)
I mean octillery2hater was targeted at a specific user aswell, which is me. and no I don't own the account.
but whatever.
Octillery Social Credit Test DX | Octillery VS Collection
You ever take a rat...cut it open, stick your pee pee in, let it live? You remind me of that rat.
At 10/13/21 04:26 PM, drizzile wrote:an entire account created to harass some rando. we gotta calm the kiddies down around here
I'm still adding some to my list, but I'm thinking of forwarding it to a moderator instead of casually posting it on the forums for obvious reasons. The BBS is fully public.
I mean octillery2hater was targeted at a specific user aswell, which is me. and no I don't own the account.At 10/13/21 04:33 PM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:sorry to be a party-shitter joey, but antipicofan was made to target a specific user. whatever the hell you linked is obviously a troll account (probably yours)
but whatever.
Harassment is best reported via DMs with evidence so NG moderation can take care of it (adding that part to make sure it does not sound like backseat modding). While users can be triggered with mere submissions, they can also be triggered by attacking them in reviews (usually reported) or author replies to submission reviews. Obit attacks may also cause this, stealth edits aren't exactly invisible to anyone.
At 10/13/21 04:48 PM, drizzile wrote:At 10/13/21 04:38 PM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:At 10/13/21 04:36 PM, drizzile wrote:I mean octillery2hater was targeted at a specific user aswell, which is me. and no I don't own the account.At 10/13/21 04:33 PM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:At 10/13/21 04:26 PM, drizzile wrote:an entire account created to harass some rando. we gotta calm the kiddies down around hereoh hate accounts can be brought up on here?
@octillery2hater
sorry to be a party-shitter joey, but antipicofan was made to target a specific user. whatever the hell you linked is obviously a troll account (probably yours)
but whatever.
o2h was used for like one day and left a review, which wasn't even that incriminating. this antipico guy just went full-on "waaahh i hate this guy and everything he stands for" and get jerked off by other shitty troll accounts like fnfisbad.
it's not even funny it just makes me wish drop-kicking 12-year-old children on a highway was legal
good point
also I agree
Octillery Social Credit Test DX | Octillery VS Collection
You ever take a rat...cut it open, stick your pee pee in, let it live? You remind me of that rat.
At 10/13/21 04:50 PM, tjohnson360 wrote:Gameplay footage
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/818300
edit: checked the footage again and it's not a game, confused at the moment, lets take this to the higher ranks
That's actually a trailer but the Scratchception is confusing. You can edit your report, don't worry.