Octillery Social Credit Test DX | Octillery VS Collection
You ever take a rat...cut it open, stick your pee pee in, let it live? You remind me of that rat.
HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
At 10/9/21 05:28 AM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817756
super mario 63 reupload, i think
It was stolen from another user. I think this is the original upload from 2009, by Runouw:
The reuploader liked it so much that he decided to steal it.
Don't know why the reuploader has an old version though, probably found it on some other website. Runouw's own submission is updated with new features.
At 10/9/21 05:38 AM, Mikoma wrote:At 10/9/21 05:28 AM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817756
super mario 63 reupload, i think
It was stolen from another user. I think this is the original upload from 2009, by Runouw:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/498969
The reuploader liked it so much that he decided to steal it.
Don't know why the reuploader has an old version though, probably found it on some other website. Runouw's own submission is updated with new features.
Thanks for checking. Would this count as a valid submission with new content then?
#817761: No animation.
At 10/8/21 02:10 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817678
Stolen. Thumb is SFW but adult warning.
@Exedor Heads-up on this one please, Commander Exedor?
Pretty sure this is stolen content from the paywalled version in the twitter link.
Either way, not the author's own submission.
At 10/9/21 06:41 AM, DeepCrimson wrote:At 10/9/21 05:38 AM, Mikoma wrote:Don't know why the reuploader has an old version though, probably found it on some other website. Runouw's own submission is updated with new features.Thanks for checking. Would this count as a valid submission with new content then?
You got it backwards, the original upload from 2009 has the new content. The reupload somehow has the old stuff prior to the updates.
And to answer your question: Assuming that a user updated it themselves. No, it is still stolen content. Even if a user adds their own features, they can't just take another person's content.
"Your submission must not be a modified version of someone else's work, including tutorial files."
You got it backwards, the original upload from 2009 has the new content. The reupload somehow has the old stuff prior to the updates.At 10/9/21 05:38 AM, Mikoma wrote:
And to answer your question: Assuming that a user updated it themselves. No, it is still stolen content. Even if a user adds their own features, they can't just take another person's content.
"Your submission must not be a modified version of someone else's work, including tutorial files."
Thanks for the clarification, Mikoma! *salutes*
Reporting if that's not already taken care of. Yeah, I see your point on this one now, the review makes it pretty obvious too.
(Should really not pull all-nighters on Portal Duty. This is not healthy!)
At 10/10/21 01:25 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:Sex Movie (newgrounds.com)
Two frames with no animation.
I fapped.
JK, I v0ted, tho.
Found this Blender tutorial out in the wild. Been out for a few days. Thoughts?
At 10/10/21 04:17 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817565
Found this Blender tutorial out in the wild. Been out for a few days. Thoughts?
Saw this one too and decided to ignore it. Looks like a legit tutorial to me.
The author makes their own Blender stuff, but I'm not sure about the validity of the submission itself.
#817890: 4 seconds, 1 frame. No animation.
@Exedor Do we allow visualizers, Commander Exedor? The author doesn't seem to have submitted it in bad faith but double-checking just in case. Debatable as far as submission guidelines go but I'm not touching it for the time being.
#817902: Gameplay footage of the FNF sex mod. (Username was interesting btw.)
It's a tikTok video. While yes it is animation but I'm not sure if this breaks any rules or not.
At 10/10/21 06:17 AM, DeepCrimson wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817897
@Exedor Do we allow visualizers, Commander Exedor? The author doesn't seem to have submitted it in bad faith but double-checking just in case. Debatable as far as submission guidelines go but I'm not touching it for the time being.
To quote the rules:
Do not submit something that is merely a sound visualizer set to music, or a recording of your music project timeline. If you want to promote your song in the movie portal, it should be set to original animation like a proper music video; otherwise stick to the Audio Portal.
At 10/10/21 09:09 AM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:To quote the rules:
Do not submit something that is merely a sound visualizer set to music, or a recording of your music project timeline. If you want to promote your song in the movie portal, it should be set to original animation like a proper music video; otherwise stick to the Audio Portal.
Looks like I should stop pulling all-nighters reviewing and judging 200+ submissions.
Thanks, Commander Pokemonpoeguygcn! *salutes*
Reported accordingly as this is not a proper MV.
#817912: Someone's going batshit crazy with the NG API here, lol.
Hundreds of queries per second, obviously 429s to high hell but also means both a browser crasher and saturating the NG servers.
Should I ping Herbie (or someone else) about this?
(Jare's games don't ping this hard so they're pretty much safe, this one's kinda dangerous though.)
Edit: Formatting. Left a review in case this was an accident (happened a few times for things like clickers that wrongly use the API - though in this case it pings constantly, not even on a click).
The loop starts on a click and will also break local storage in the browser. Waiting for user to reply to the review, I'll file a malicious report if I get the green light from a NG moderator.
Update: It now spams invalid post score API queries as well, around 50 QPS, directly after the very first click.
(Sorry for multiposting, senior officers, edit timeframe...)
Edit: User fixed the medal, told them they should check on the API calls as well.
At 10/10/21 11:10 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:How often does Jare usually ping?
Depends on the game really, but nothing above 10 QPS from my experience so it'll only really mess with the scoreboard and not post the score if something blows up (as he also limits the playing time).
#817916: Gameplay footage.
#817936: Is that another suicide by cop?
Seeing as the user also hates M-Bot, they probably didn't understand why M-Bot contacted them in the first place.
#817941: https://uploads.ungrounded.net/alternate/1765000/1765073_alternate_157614_r2.zip
Erm... This is a string to me. Technically, of course. Or a path. *coughs*
I guess we know that it was made with Godot, but we have to hack into the user's computer to know what it is. :3
#817954: Embedding an audio recording within an animation now... Is this considered creative?
And stolen from GabDro Ep7, too...
Gab-chan's still cute but nope
#817964: Misrated. Should be E for Everyone.
I'm going to start and keep track of my tokens. Trollgrounds wasn't this bad back in my time but eh, they all say things change and you just gotta adapt. *old female grunt sigh*
Our mission is to make it better, after all...
At 10/10/21 06:39 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:#817964: Misrated. Should be E for Everyone.
Rated E for "Eulogy."
At 10/11/21 01:11 AM, Exedor wrote:At 10/10/21 06:39 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:#817964: Misrated. Should be E for Everyone.Rated E for "Eulogy."
Don't forget to also rate T for 'Too shitty", M for "More of this and I'll blow my brains out" and A for "Awful"
At 8/9/21 09:35 AM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 7/17/21 11:29 AM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 7/4/21 11:37 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 6/16/21 07:07 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 4/15/21 09:25 AM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 1/12/21 11:14 AM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 1/3/21 01:06 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 12/30/20 12:37 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 12/12/20 11:54 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 11/11/20 06:59 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 10/15/20 07:29 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 9/21/20 09:01 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 9/7/20 10:44 PM, GUTHRIE wrote:"dis is a reupload"
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/765218
I have no words.
It's this same fucking game again! Why do people submit this shit so constantly?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/766472
Here it is AGAIN
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/768755
Here it is AGAIN!!
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/771440
Same story, different day.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/774296
Here's the same fucking game again!
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/776231
What is it about this god damn game that causes people to submit it so often?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/776719
It's hard to see, but here it is again! Twice! Fuck!
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/777569
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/777570
Here it is again with a little nazi symbolism (for extra flavor?). Fuck these kids.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/788927
It's back for another round!
Ayyyyyy here it is again!
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/803594
Anybody want to play a little Firey's Candy Bar Adventure?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/805677
One more time, am I starting to like this game?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/809332
(no I am not)
Hi everyone! Anyone miss this old firey friend?
