If anyone finds real porn in these, please flag and let me know. I don't have enough time to dedicate to playing it all through and searching it out, but based on some conversations I've had with the author, I figured I should post about it. Lemme know if you find anything. :\

Youtube is leaking :

I couldn't get that one to play in either Firefox or Chrome. Can you check the others? What browser are you using? https://terminusgenesius.newgrounds.com/movies

That's weird, I'm on Firefox too, and all of those play well, maybe because my browser it's a bit outdated (52 or so).

The remaining 2 videos are the same kind of content.

Yesterday I had problems playing some movies on the judgement section, they stopped a few seconds after starting.

I changed the player's stream quality to 360 and that solved the problem ;)

The site was slow for me as well. It can likely be attributed to the Smash Collab, since the volume of people trying to watch it crashed NG briefly. 71K views in one day.

Stolen from RobenSikk. I didn't do any detective work, I legitimately know the guy who uploaded it. Now he's trying to twll me he has permission from the author to post it, but if you didn't make it, you can't post it, no matter what. I'm not wrong about that, am I?

He submitted work that wasn't his, so no, you're not wrong. It's been removed.

Stop trolling. I doubt he exposed any of your personal info on the forums.

This thread is for reporting rule breaking submissions, not for trolling or trying to start a fight. Don't post here anymore with that drama unless you want a forum ban. Also, don't submit anything that doesn't belong to you. If you haven't noticed, it's against the rules.

You are one negative post away from being banned from this forum. Stop the trolling, upload original work only, and try to mature a bit for 2019 - it'll make your mom proud.

• CBO EGSC byteslinger

It's fine. He won't do it anymore. The personal information was probably referring to me saying I know him.

Literally just an ad for a dating site with a bit.ly link in the description. Haven't seen one of these in a while.

Look a little TOO good. Maybe it's just me being paranoid.

Asides from the typo at the start, yeah it is surprisingly good. I couldn't find anything on it though, so innocent until shown otherwise.

Just because you aren't paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.

He definitely won't because his account got deleted. I wonder if he requested it or if there was another issue with the guy.

Either way, I said what I did because this thread is one of the last places you want to act like a troll. A lot of moderators here, haha. Plus, we're not going to tolerate it.

Not an animation, just music with a clip/fan made gif from an anime called "Durarara". Regardless of which one it is, it's clear that he didn't make it himself.

Here's the source to the animation clip/gif from the show posted about an year ago: https://weheartit.com/entry/273040276

Yes, I'd say it's from the show itself, that place seems to be a sharing platform. However, we can't be sure, and if the person who uploaded that gif did make it, how do we know the uploader of this and them are different people? Though I would guess it's not the uploader's property, because they say they're a music creator, graphic designer (animation doesn't count there, right?) and video editor. I'll place my trust in you this time, because they don't say anything about making it.

I took out the trash. :3

Another dating webzite thing. A guy clicking through a website isn't allowed, right? If so, please leave me some time to flag it. Also, what flag categoy is that? It's not an advertisement.

I think it technically counts as spam (advertisement), since it ultimately serves no other purpose than to bait people into clicking the bit.ly link in the description. The clickbaity title and the "CLICK THE LINK IN THE DESCRIPTION"-text make it total spam

Also it blatantly breaks the site rules.

https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/game-and-movie-guidelines

Your submission must not simply be an ad for your site.



I think it's clear that this counts as an ad to another website.

Yeah, it does advertise the link and its only purpose is to expose the scam of FullBloomFlirt (ugh, typing that makes me feel icky).

But is it this person's website ad is that an important distinction?

Yes, I suppose. Though it's more a dismissal of another. Still though, no original animation.

This is back after being removed yesterday.

Taken off again, thanks for the report.

It is a picture with no animation.

Is this just a redirect to a game from 2015?

Am I missing something here?

That's what I get as well.

Edit: OH I GET IT

The one it links to is still UJ since 2015 somehow.

Edit edit (sorry):

Now, normally I don't bother with these A rated SFM submissions. In this case, the content has a Disney character (Stitch). Thankfully not the kid from the movie, but likely still enough for Disney to go bonkers over.

Stolen from here.

Some companies are pretty chill about fanart since it “grows the brand” (less so for porn, but you know). Disney’s legal department is hellbent on giving notices to small artists. Etsy (handmade goods) has some pretty routine legal action removals of Disney themed goods (including things made with licensed patterned cloth). Nintendo is the same, which resulted in the “no mario sprites” rule.

Seen. I agree that SFM doesn’t seem to have a space in the art portal, because at least the other artists making smut are drawing it themselves vs rendering a model someone else made.

For movies...I don’t know. NG has always been open to A rated material as long as theres some effort. I know the “should NG be more work safe” argument has been had a bunch.

In this case, an alien from a Disney kids movie is having cordial relations with other (adult) characters. I guess thats my line in the sand. Really, it might not break the rules but sometimes I like to pretend I have a moral compass.

I think this lands under the "No loli porn"-rule.

There's also a timelapse animation of this being drawn in the animation portal but It doesn't even play for me.

Well, you don't wanna report that to the Barracks, but anyways, I don't think we have a no-loli rule. Unless you have proof this is an actual minor being represented, I think it has to stay.

I didn't know you needed proof about that, I read the rules in the wiki and it says:

- It depicts a sexually suggestive image of a child (note: this judgement is based on the image alone, regardless of whether you say the subject is 18+ in the comments).

Based on the image alone it would seem like the character is clearly underage, but I'll trust your judgement if you don't agree.

Also, I think the animation of it being drawn does belong to the barracks at least.

Sorry if this post indeed was pointless.

No, no, I agree. I should have read through the rules again. Then again, who would be the authority on this.do we vote it out or what?

God, sorry, I wasn't paying attention, I didn't see the time-lapse. I'm going to flag this, and hopefuly the mods will agree.