It's fine. He won't do it anymore. The personal information was probably referring to me saying I know him.

Literally just an ad for a dating site with a bit.ly link in the description. Haven't seen one of these in a while.

Look a little TOO good. Maybe it's just me being paranoid.

Asides from the typo at the start, yeah it is surprisingly good. I couldn't find anything on it though, so innocent until shown otherwise.

Just because you aren't paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.

He definitely won't because his account got deleted. I wonder if he requested it or if there was another issue with the guy.

Either way, I said what I did because this thread is one of the last places you want to act like a troll. A lot of moderators here, haha. Plus, we're not going to tolerate it.

Not an animation, just music with a clip/fan made gif from an anime called "Durarara". Regardless of which one it is, it's clear that he didn't make it himself.

Here's the source to the animation clip/gif from the show posted about an year ago: https://weheartit.com/entry/273040276

Yes, I'd say it's from the show itself, that place seems to be a sharing platform. However, we can't be sure, and if the person who uploaded that gif did make it, how do we know the uploader of this and them are different people? Though I would guess it's not the uploader's property, because they say they're a music creator, graphic designer (animation doesn't count there, right?) and video editor. I'll place my trust in you this time, because they don't say anything about making it.

I took out the trash. :3

Another dating webzite thing. A guy clicking through a website isn't allowed, right? If so, please leave me some time to flag it. Also, what flag categoy is that? It's not an advertisement.

I think it technically counts as spam (advertisement), since it ultimately serves no other purpose than to bait people into clicking the bit.ly link in the description. The clickbaity title and the "CLICK THE LINK IN THE DESCRIPTION"-text make it total spam

Also it blatantly breaks the site rules.

https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/game-and-movie-guidelines

Your submission must not simply be an ad for your site.



I think it's clear that this counts as an ad to another website.

Yeah, it does advertise the link and its only purpose is to expose the scam of FullBloomFlirt (ugh, typing that makes me feel icky).

But is it this person's website ad is that an important distinction?

Yes, I suppose. Though it's more a dismissal of another. Still though, no original animation.

This is back after being removed yesterday.

Taken off again, thanks for the report.

It is a picture with no animation.

Is this just a redirect to a game from 2015?

Am I missing something here?

That's what I get as well.

Edit: OH I GET IT

The one it links to is still UJ since 2015 somehow.

Edit edit (sorry):

Now, normally I don't bother with these A rated SFM submissions. In this case, the content has a Disney character (Stitch). Thankfully not the kid from the movie, but likely still enough for Disney to go bonkers over.

Stolen from here.

Some companies are pretty chill about fanart since it “grows the brand” (less so for porn, but you know). Disney’s legal department is hellbent on giving notices to small artists. Etsy (handmade goods) has some pretty routine legal action removals of Disney themed goods (including things made with licensed patterned cloth). Nintendo is the same, which resulted in the “no mario sprites” rule.

Seen. I agree that SFM doesn’t seem to have a space in the art portal, because at least the other artists making smut are drawing it themselves vs rendering a model someone else made.

For movies...I don’t know. NG has always been open to A rated material as long as theres some effort. I know the “should NG be more work safe” argument has been had a bunch.

In this case, an alien from a Disney kids movie is having cordial relations with other (adult) characters. I guess thats my line in the sand. Really, it might not break the rules but sometimes I like to pretend I have a moral compass.

I think this lands under the "No loli porn"-rule.

There's also a timelapse animation of this being drawn in the animation portal but It doesn't even play for me.

Well, you don't wanna report that to the Barracks, but anyways, I don't think we have a no-loli rule. Unless you have proof this is an actual minor being represented, I think it has to stay.

I didn't know you needed proof about that, I read the rules in the wiki and it says:

- It depicts a sexually suggestive image of a child (note: this judgement is based on the image alone, regardless of whether you say the subject is 18+ in the comments).

Based on the image alone it would seem like the character is clearly underage, but I'll trust your judgement if you don't agree.

Also, I think the animation of it being drawn does belong to the barracks at least.

Sorry if this post indeed was pointless.

No, no, I agree. I should have read through the rules again. Then again, who would be the authority on this.do we vote it out or what?

God, sorry, I wasn't paying attention, I didn't see the time-lapse. I'm going to flag this, and hopefuly the mods will agree.

The idea of an Art Portal cleanup crew was floated recently, due to the flood of Source Filmmaker (SFM) images.

Can always preform the ritual summoning of an Art mod to clarify. @Exedor @TurkeyOnAStick, can we get some guidance on "how loli is too loli" when it comes to art submissions with characters which appear to be minors? In this case, the art appears to now be deleted, but reference can be found at the Time Lapse (NSFW) which is under judgement.

As for flagging a submission in the Games/Movies portal, or in general, I don't think any mod would want to punish you for a bad report if your intent was good. Can always clarity with them as well, a whole bunch are already here: @byteslinger @gamejunkie @Big-Boss @Asandir.

*the art portal opens and an abomination to mankind appears*

I agree with the item that was deleted.

If something shows what appears to be a child that is either in a sexually explicit pose (groping itself, partially naked or more), or is being penetrated, then I would remove it.

The label “lolicon” shouldn’t factor into it, nor if the character or description is stated as 18+. These aren’t get-out-of-jail-free cards, and if the image was shown to somebody naieve with no context (like a judge!) they would still consider it kiddy porn. Report it based on your opinion that the image alone contains a child and is sexually explicit.

*hobbles back into the art portal*

My gods, what have I done?

And there we have it.

You're welcome to stay, there's lemonade over this-a-way.

Sorry for the delay, all. Been busy during the week, so weekends allow more time to respond at length.

If you come across such a beast, kill it with fire. The Art Portal mods are really good at staying on top of the Art Portal flags. The EGB and the Audio Portal Clean Up threads help speed things up with reports and info, but the art side of things is a bit quicker and easier to police. Art reporting threads get locked up pretty quick, so no need for anyone to tackle that. ;)

I'm verifying this at the moment, but as I understand it, the rules on SFM submissions to the Art Portal has been indefinitely suspended, but if that changes, I will let you all know.

And, that's the key. Tags and author comments do not matter. The basic rule is this: If it looks like a child and is sexual in nature, flag dat shiz. It doesn't matter if they claim the character is 18+, if it looks like a child. And, it doesn't matter if the character is 10 on the show if they do not look underage in the submission.

Correct. It doesn't really matter what flag you use. Mods get the flag and act accordingly. If there''s no report, or the report is way off base, then the user is more likely to be punished.

So should i flag artwork with such situations? Looks under age, sexual in nature, and even if the artist claims they're 18+ though they're underage in the real show. I see some art as such floating around in the portal.

The 'real show' is irrelevant regardless. All that matters is how the character looks in the image. Aged-up art based on a young character would get a pass.

Imma gonna set this here thingie right here:

@Byteslinger it seems NGX is down. What happened? Will you be able to pull the stats for December? Is this just happening to me?