At 4/12/15 12:08 AM, gamejunkie wrote:
At 4/11/15 11:31 PM, ThePulp wrote:
Shovelware
I tend to agree but this kind of 'shovelware' is reasonably acceptable since the author did seemingly put a fair amount of work into it. It certainly is not what you would call 'standard shovelware'. As harsh as I am with my voting, I personally think this deserves to pass judgement. It's at least worth a 2 in my book.
Agreed. It's the kind of shovelware that irks us to no end, because it's not a cookie cutter game, but it's entertainment for the kind of user who hasn't seen 'real' games yet and thus, is impressed enough to rate highly, or by kids of the age that we really don't want them having accounts yet anyway.
I don't remember if I passed or "round scored" it. :\ I will not cry if it gets blammed. Of course, if it passes, the author will be encouraged to make and submit more, and we'll have to review him again someday. :\
BTW, that's also what's been going on with games2jolly and why it's taken so long to get them handled. I've been given approval to "address" them, but have been so busy with health/employment/financial/computer problems that I haven't been able to tackle that yet. It's on my list of things to do, tho. @jonthomson