I reported this user yesterday he had gay porn on his user page, and repeated abusive reviews he claimed he was hacked. Well he has submitted this sick video I reported it warning NSFW

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

The user seems to have tons of alt here but the one I'm concerned about is this user

http://memea.newgrounds.com/

.

Thanks EagleRock for the suggestion.

At 9/20/09 06:39 PM, EagleRock wrote: You used "oldfag," lol. But in all seriousness, the EGB was really close-knit when it was first started. Especially once you hit page 100-200, it was like one mass of voting power working in one elite formation...

Now that i hear about what this place was in the the past, i wish i could have been here to see it and to have been apart of it. We are pretty close today, just not all of the members are actvie all of the time. We do still have alot of people with high voting powers, but they are no longer active.

Plus, the conversations were HILARIOUS at times. I certainly plan on getting the thread back into that kick now that I'll be around for a while.

I hope you do bring this to the table now that you are back posting often now. I do miss Phantoms dry sence of humor where he would be a complete ass to everyone...that was just funny to me.

At 9/20/09 08:42 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: The user seems to have tons of alt here but the one I'm concerned about is this user
http://memea.newgrounds.com/.

That account was yeeked by MherMeiser, or Genderless-Hooker if I'm right about the alt connection. So were chillbro and metaknightPWNS (chillbro got his account back though, while metaknightPWNS was deleted, and then remade by the spammer). Some others too, I think. Be on the lookout for stolen Flash and fileswaps, we all know his reputation.

Gah, it's getting hard to keep track of these guys anymore with everyone being deleted weekly.

At 9/20/09 09:05 PM, SoulMaster71 wrote:

That account was yeeked by MherMeiser, or Genderless-Hooker if I'm right about the alt connection. So were chillbro and metaknightPWNS (chillbro got his account back though, while metaknightPWNS was deleted, and then remade by the spammer). Some others too, I think. Be on the lookout for stolen Flash and fileswaps, we all know his reputation.

Damn it, it makes things really hard to figure out when they keep hacking accounts and then i have to add more names to the equation. Now i don't know who the accounts where before they were hacked. Just normal users, or did they subit flash, or they post alot on the forums? We need to make some connections here, or if they are just going on getting any random accounts. G-H did not seem like such a big probelm, nothing more then garbage submissions.

Was the flash phantomlassuk reported a fileswap or what....theres no way we let that slide by...>.<

Any Dallasfags or New Yorkfags watching the game? Clearly the best one of the week, especially from the 2 plays within the last 1:30 of the second quarter.

At 9/20/09 09:23 PM, idiot-buster wrote: Damn it, it makes things really hard to figure out when they keep hacking accounts and then i have to add more names to the equation. Now i don't know who the accounts where before they were hacked. Just normal users, or did they subit flash, or they post alot on the forums? We need to make some connections here, or if they are just going on getting any random accounts. G-H did not seem like such a big probelm, nothing more then garbage submissions.

Well, I know metaknightPWNS had taken a strong stand against spam, and specifically against Hooker himself, as well as being the very kind of user that spammers dislike most: a video game fanboy combined with a "Newgrounds faggot", if I may use such a term. The rest, I have no idea. But if Hooker's like the spammers of 07/08, he'd take any account if he thought someone would be annoyed by its use.

Was the flash phantomlassuk reported a fileswap or what....theres no way we let that slide by...>.<

It was a stolen submission earlier, I think, swapped to hardcore gay porn after passing, same old Hooker. But it's been deleted, Wade or someone must have got on and got rid of it.

Yeesh...you people are really picking up the convo in here...I like that.

At 9/20/09 07:25 PM, michelinman wrote:

At 9/20/09 06:39 PM, EagleRock wrote: You used "oldfag," lol.

Oldfag BBS wise. I was referring to this "death of newgrounds" theory. I'm STILL the newfag on the EGB forums. Newest member: michelinman. Someone needs to damn join. Haha.

Oh sure, you're a NG oldfag by all rights. I was just laughing at the 4chan terminology...lol

Plus, the conversations were HILARIOUS at times. I certainly plan on getting the thread back into that kick now that I'll be around for a while.

That would be pretty sweet, but it seems to be a trend happening these last few years. I used to laugh my ASS off on the BBS a few years back. Now i chuckle every now and again, but that's about it. A few years ago, the dickneck thread would've sank pretty quickly, because at the end of the day, it's just rippin on one of the hundreds of noobs that did something stupid, whereas nowadays, those type of threads are deleted on sight. There was just so much madness and hilarity in General back then. Now it's a lot like Liz said. People get banned and shit gets locked before anything ever gets really funny. I feel bad for him though because he never got to see the good ol' days.

Yeah, things are a big different around here, though it's not necessarily for the worse. I'll tell you, some of the crap back then was exactly that: crap.

I think that trend is kinda leaking over into the other forums as the standard is kind of being set higher and higher for something to be qualified as a good post. Sure good posts are more beneficial, but the funniest things that happen on this site will ALWAYS be from a large group of people laughing at one asshole. When I look back on my post history, there's so many RIDICULOUS threads that would be instantly deleted today, but they've got pages of posts and are still unlocked. Haha.

Yeah, I think we do need a bit of relaxation in certain threads (General) but keep the rest of the BBS more restricted (Wi/Ht, Politics, C&C) and more non-insane. It'll make for good overall enjoyment. Or at least create a new forum meant for complete hysteria with lax rules.

At 9/20/09 10:05 PM, TheThing wrote: Any Dallasfags or New Yorkfags watching the game? Clearly the best one of the week, especially from the 2 plays within the last 1:30 of the second quarter.

Well, I'm a New Yorkfag, but make that a Yankeefag. I don't watch football, sry.

At 9/20/09 11:29 PM, EagleRock wrote:

At 9/20/09 10:05 PM, TheThing wrote: Any Dallasfags or New Yorkfags watching the game? Clearly the best one of the week, especially from the 2 plays within the last 1:30 of the second quarter.

Well, I'm a New Yorkfag, but make that a Yankeefag. I don't watch football, sry.

Damn, one of the best games in a long while. Ironically, since the Giants - Patriots Superbowl.

Man, I can't wait for tomorrow. It's gonna be AWESOME! I've always enjoyed the Madness collection and Madness Day. Speaking of which, who decided that Madness Day is September 22nd? Was that Tom, Wade, or Krinkels?

At 9/21/09 12:00 PM, SlntCobra1 wrote: Man, I can't wait for tomorrow. It's gonna be AWESOME! I've always enjoyed the Madness collection and Madness Day. Speaking of which, who decided that Madness Day is September 22nd? Was that Tom, Wade, or Krinkels?

Probably Tom and Krinkels, Wade usually doesn't have a say in anything but the portal and accounts.

At 9/21/09 12:00 PM, SlntCobra1 wrote: Man, I can't wait for tomorrow. It's gonna be AWESOME! I've always enjoyed the Madness collection and Madness Day. Speaking of which, who decided that Madness Day is September 22nd? Was that Tom, Wade, or Krinkels?

I've already seen about 2 dozen Madness Day flash, and it's the day BEFORE.

At 9/21/09 12:02 PM, DumbassDude wrote: Probably Tom and Krinkels, Wade usually doesn't have a say in anything but the portal and accounts.

Yeah. Wade's job is just to be an Internet Badass. :-P

Wade's awesome, though. He's a blast to talk to.

I mostly cook breakfast foods, main trouble is flipping eggs without folding it.

Anyway, you should try fried butter-fish (not buttered fish)

At 9/21/09 12:12 PM, EagleRock wrote: Wade's awesome, though. He's a blast to talk to.

He'll go off on the WEIRDEST shit though. He talked to us for like 3 hours about flashlights one night on the stickam chat. :P

At 9/21/09 12:02 AM, TheThing wrote:

Damn, one of the best games in a long while. Ironically, since the Giants - Patriots Superbowl.

Anyone who would rank SB 43 over 42 are idiots, plain and simple.

Ohhh it's not high scoring lol...

I hate those kind of people.

At 9/21/09 12:38 PM, michelinman wrote:

At 9/21/09 12:12 PM, EagleRock wrote: Wade's awesome, though. He's a blast to talk to.

He'll go off on the WEIRDEST shit though. He talked to us for like 3 hours about flashlights one night on the stickam chat. :P

The man is obsessed with them. He used to be obsessed with knives, too, but he's kinda gone off on flashlights now. Since I'm an Eagle Scout, I knew a bunch of pocket knives...I'd say he and I chatted for 6 hours one time on knives, it was awesome.

But yeah, you need a flashlight? Ask him. He'll give you a dissertation on which one you need. :-P

A dissertation on flashlights, lmao. I could give anyone a vast amount of info on Dragons, the M1A1 Abrams, Dragon Skin, a Nimitz class aircraft carrier, the F/A-22 RAPTOR, Greek Mythology, Norse Mythology, and Egyptian Mythology.

And your point is? Also, I don't use Google for that at all. I did my senior english high school paper on military spending and "studied" the Nimitz carriers, Dragon Skin, F/A-22 RAPTOR, and the M1A1 Abrams. I also read a lot of Dragonlance books. That's from where my vast knowledge of Dragons came.

Yes I'm a bit of a Grammar Nazi myself. I'm trying not to end my sentences with prepositional phrases.

Who am I gonna talk with?

FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!! lmao

At 9/21/09 01:48 PM, SlntCobra1 wrote: And your point is? Also, I don't use Google for that at all. I did my senior english high school paper on military spending and "studied" the Nimitz carriers, Dragon Skin, F/A-22 RAPTOR, and the M1A1 Abrams. I also read a lot of Dragonlance books. That's from where my vast knowledge of Dragons came.

While I find your depth of knowledge on the military quite fascinating, you do realize that in this dimension, dragons are ficticious, and therefore, so is all information about them. Now, you can argue that some lizards (no, not Lizzardis ;) ) and some extinct dinosaurs looked like dragons, but they themselves weren't dragons in their own right. Anything you "know" about dragons is simply someone elses imagination - and that information will vary from author to author.

Out of curiousity, who do you use as your source on dragons besides "Dragonlance"? Oddly enough, the concept of dragons as monsters dates back to ancient Mesapotamian times - but the term "dragon" was loosely translated as any large creature the natives had no other name to give it. The ancient Greek, Romans and Chinese all have dragons in their mythos as well.

Oh, and I'll let this little nugget out of the time capsule of my mis-spent youth: In my early teens, I not only played D&D, I was also a DM. It was quite unusual for a "girl" to play back then, but I was a tomboy until high-school, and a geek to boot. Plus, that's where all the smart guys got together - and they were the only ones I really chose to hang out with on a regular basis. I do have many of the original D&D manuals; but I'm not sure who G. Gary Gygax used as a reference for his version of dragons back then. Can't ask him now - he's dead. Guess we'll never know.

Now, maybe in a parallel dimension, there might have been dragons after all....hmmmm...maybe in the sequel...yeah, I can see it now: "The Dragonriders of the EGB"...heheheheh....

Well, I knew that Dragons in this dimension are nothing more that pure myth and whatnot, but they're still badass. I also have a friend who plays D&D and he loaned me his Dragon manual a while. I never really did read it per se.

Also, "Dragonriders of the EGB" that sounds like something I could write if'n you wouldn't mind. 'Course, I'm still writing my own fanfic, but hey, why the hell not, right?

At 9/21/09 02:19 PM, byteslinger wrote: Oh, and I'll let this little nugget out of the time capsule of my mis-spent youth: In my early teens, I not only played D&D, I was also a DM. It was quite unusual for a "girl" to play back then, but I was a tomboy until high-school, and a geek to boot. Plus, that's where all the smart guys got together - and they were the only ones I really chose to hang out with on a regular basis. I do have many of the original D&D manuals; but I'm not sure who G. Gary Gygax used as a reference for his version of dragons back then. Can't ask him now - he's dead. Guess we'll never know.

Awesome. I love girls that are willing to be comfortable with their geekiness. I still say I knew my wife was the one for me the day she wiped the floor with me playing Mario Kart 64... :-P

By the way, if you're looking for a good reference on dragons, here you go :-)

At 9/21/09 02:27 PM, SlntCobra1 wrote: Also, "Dragonriders of the EGB" that sounds like something I could write if'n you wouldn't mind. 'Course, I'm still writing my own fanfic, but hey, why the hell not, right?

Sounds quite Tolkien for me. :-P Not that I hate J.R.R. Tolkien's work, mind you...

At 9/21/09 02:19 PM, byteslinger wrote: While I find your depth of knowledge on the military quite fascinating, you do realize that in this dimension, dragons are ficticious, and therefore, so is all information about them.

Oh yeah, I have a little quip about this one, byte. Is this your brother?

At 9/20/09 07:25 PM, michelinman wrote: People get banned and shit gets locked before anything ever gets really funny. I feel bad for him though because he never got to see the good ol' days.

I won't argue about whether threads being locked quickly is good or not, but I'll just say that mods acting quickly and efficiently doesn't mean that Newgrounds is dying.

At 9/20/09 11:29 PM, EagleRock wrote: Yeesh...you people are really picking up the convo in here...I like that.

Indeed, it looks like whenever I go away for some hours, people start posting at a faster rate than usual.

In other use, I signed up for some kind of robotic sumo contest along with another three friends, it basically consists of programming a box so that it's able to throw another box off a circle. We have one week to do all that, and today we started working on it and it was pretty fun tweaking the code and watching the computer simulator. It's all programmed in JavaScript, and even if I don't know THAT much about Java when compared to our "main programmer", I felt quite useful when I discovered a big flaw in the code that everyone had overlooked.

So yeah, I'll be busy having lots of fun for the next week :D

At 9/21/09 02:19 PM, byteslinger wrote: Out of curiousity, who do you use as your source on dragons besides "Dragonlance"? Oddly enough, the concept of dragons as monsters dates back to ancient Mesapotamian times - but the term "dragon" was loosely translated as any large creature the natives had no other name to give it. The ancient Greek, Romans and Chinese all have dragons in their mythos as well.

The History Channel had a special on dragons a few years back, and one of its hypotheses was that dragons were a combination of some of the most common (and thus feared) predators of humanity's not-quite-human ancestors. Snakes, for example, and different birds of prey. Of course, that's just a guess from the TV.

Oh, and I'll let this little nugget out of the time capsule of my mis-spent youth: In my early teens, I not only played D&D, I was also a DM.

Odd, I was just thinking of D&D myself today. Would someone remind me when the EGB became a nerd hivemind, talking D&D while I was at school reading about a fictional D&D game railroaded to follow the LotR plot and some list of hilarious things that shouldn't be done during a tabletop RPG?

It was quite unusual for a "girl" to play back then, but I was a tomboy until high-school, and a geek to boot. Plus, that's where all the smart guys got together - and they were the only ones I really chose to hang out with on a regular basis.

As for that, you're now working with computers, networking, scripts, whatever; a lot of my college classmates (read:"ghetto people/dumb jocks") might say you're still a bit of a nerd. But who am I to talk, I browse TV Tropes from school.

I do have many of the original D&D manuals; but I'm not sure who G. Gary Gygax used as a reference for his version of dragons back then. Can't ask him now - he's dead. Guess we'll never know.

It's pretty well-known (at least from any sources I read) that he adapted a lot of concepts from Tolkien, maybe that included his dragons. Not having played D&D, I really don't know. Though the thought came to me just hours ago that I should try D&D.

At 9/21/09 02:36 PM, EagleRock wrote: Sounds quite Tolkien for me. :-P Not that I hate J.R.R. Tolkien's work, mind you...

I'm something of a Tolkien fan, to the point of having an unused Quenya (one of the languages of the Elves) course on my computer. I was going to learn the language eventually, but "eventually" came and went. Interestingly enough, according to my local paper today is the 72nd anniversary of the first publishing of The Hobbit. Quite a coincidence that the EGB mentions Tolkien and other facets of geekdom today.

At 9/21/09 02:19 PM, byteslinger wrote: While I find your depth of knowledge on the military quite fascinating, you do realize that in this dimension, dragons are ficticious, and therefore, so is all information about them.

Oh yeah, I have a little quip about this one, byte. Is this your brother?

Fukken saved.

At 9/21/09 02:36 PM, EagleRock wrote: Oh yeah, I have a little quip about this one, byte. Is this your brother?

That's SUPREME COMMANDER Obvious to you, mistah!

What a pic!

Yeah, I've been so engrossed in the alternate-dimension plotlines that sometimes reality escapes me. Oh, wait...reality ALWAYS escapes me. Nah, nevermind. I don't suffer from insanity - in fact, I rather enjoy every moment of it!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *runs off, flailing arms over head, muttering incoherently*

At 9/20/09 10:37 PM, SoulMaster71 wrote: Well, I know metaknightPWNS had taken a strong stand against spam, and specifically against Hooker himself, as well as being the very kind of user that spammers dislike most: a video game fanboy combined with a "Newgrounds faggot", if I may use such a term. The rest, I have no idea. But if Hooker's like the spammers of 07/08, he'd take any account if he thought someone would be annoyed by its use.

Oh that is the reason for that account to be hacked...Though i don't know the difference between hack and yeek? They are becomming more technical savvy more then ever now. When i first joined i never remember the spammers hacking accounts and such. He is just trying to get our attention and he is getting it. I really think Wade should just ban the ip and the name and anything similar to it. This is just getting bad. If i do remember right i don't think yeeking or hacking is legal and you could be arrested for it.

Was the flash phantomlassuk reported a fileswap or what....theres no way we let that slide by...>.<

It was a stolen submission earlier, I think, swapped to hardcore gay porn after passing, same old Hooker. But it's been deleted, Wade or someone must have got on and got rid of it.

It had to be a file swap then, if i know them there will be more file swaps to gay porn or something of the like. I Believe Wade said that he reads through here or something so, it is remeoved and i think the user is as well.

At 9/21/09 04:50 PM, Ismael92 wrote: I won't argue about whether threads being locked quickly is good or not, but I'll just say that mods acting quickly and efficiently doesn't mean that Newgrounds is dying.

Agreed. I still see some pretty awesome threads around here, and I personally think that Newgrounds isn't dying, it's just evolving.

In other use, I signed up for some kind of robotic sumo contest along with another three friends, it basically consists of programming a box so that it's able to throw another box off a circle. We have one week to do all that, and today we started working on it and it was pretty fun tweaking the code and watching the computer simulator. It's all programmed in JavaScript, and even if I don't know THAT much about Java when compared to our "main programmer", I felt quite useful when I discovered a big flaw in the code that everyone had overlooked.

So yeah, I'll be busy having lots of fun for the next week :D

Now THAT sounds like fun. Robotics is always quite interesting, especially these sumobot contests. Good luck to you and your team!

At 9/21/09 05:56 PM, SoulMaster71 wrote:

At 9/21/09 02:19 PM, byteslinger wrote: Out of curiousity, who do you use as your source on dragons besides "Dragonlance"? Oddly enough, the concept of dragons as monsters dates back to ancient Mesapotamian times - but the term "dragon" was loosely translated as any large creature the natives had no other name to give it. The ancient Greek, Romans and Chinese all have dragons in their mythos as well.

The History Channel had a special on dragons a few years back, and one of its hypotheses was that dragons were a combination of some of the most common (and thus feared) predators of humanity's not-quite-human ancestors. Snakes, for example, and different birds of prey. Of course, that's just a guess from the TV.

Oh, and I'll let this little nugget out of the time capsule of my mis-spent youth: In my early teens, I not only played D&D, I was also a DM.

Odd, I was just thinking of D&D myself today. Would someone remind me when the EGB became a nerd hivemind, talking D&D while I was at school reading about a fictional D&D game railroaded to follow the LotR plot and some list of hilarious things that shouldn't be done during a tabletop RPG?

It was quite unusual for a "girl" to play back then, but I was a tomboy until high-school, and a geek to boot. Plus, that's where all the smart guys got together - and they were the only ones I really chose to hang out with on a regular basis.

As for that, you're now working with computers, networking, scripts, whatever; a lot of my college classmates (read:"ghetto people/dumb jocks") might say you're still a bit of a nerd. But who am I to talk, I browse TV Tropes from school.

I do have many of the original D&D manuals; but I'm not sure who G. Gary Gygax used as a reference for his version of dragons back then. Can't ask him now - he's dead. Guess we'll never know.

It's pretty well-known (at least from any sources I read) that he adapted a lot of concepts from Tolkien, maybe that included his dragons. Not having played D&D, I really don't know. Though the thought came to me just hours ago that I should try D&D.

At 9/21/09 02:36 PM, EagleRock wrote: Sounds quite Tolkien for me. :-P Not that I hate J.R.R. Tolkien's work, mind you...

I'm something of a Tolkien fan, to the point of having an unused Quenya (one of the languages of the Elves) course on my computer. I was going to learn the language eventually, but "eventually" came and went. Interestingly enough, according to my local paper today is the 72nd anniversary of the first publishing of The Hobbit. Quite a coincidence that the EGB mentions Tolkien and other facets of geekdom today.

Yeesh...72 years old?? It's amazing how long ago Tolkien actually wrote this stuff. It's still amazing that his son is still putting out some of his unfinished works. Still, The Hobbit was kinda boring to me. Not really my cup of tea. It was as exciting to me as The Silmarillion is an easy read. :-P

At 9/21/09 07:36 PM, byteslinger wrote:

At 9/21/09 02:36 PM, EagleRock wrote: Oh yeah, I have a little quip about this one, byte. Is this your brother?

That's SUPREME COMMANDER Obvious to you, mistah!

Now, now. I asked if that was your BROTHER. I know you're an EGSC, but naturally your surname would make you Supreme Commander Obvious... :-)

What a pic!

One of the best on the Internet IMHO.

Yeah, I've been so engrossed in the alternate-dimension plotlines that sometimes reality escapes me. Oh, wait...reality ALWAYS escapes me. Nah, nevermind. I don't suffer from insanity - in fact, I rather enjoy every moment of it!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *runs off, flailing arms over head, muttering incoherently*

Why did my mind turn to Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm-Flailing Tube Man?

Keep going with that story! I need more of my fix!

Anyone like my new level I do its rather cool Mace it is. I'm looking forward to Madness day tomorrow although over here it is already 22 September gosh times flies this year. Yes the hackers are more harmful then before. I'm hoping to get to Staff Sergeant soon. Dragons always has an interest there.

At 9/21/09 09:02 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: Anyone like my new level I do its rather cool Mace it is. I'm looking forward to Madness day tomorrow although over here it is already 22 September gosh times flies this year. Yes the hackers are more harmful then before. I'm hoping to get to Staff Sergeant soon. Dragons always has an interest there.

It's gonna be crazy, I'll bet. I can't wait to see what happens at 12:01.

Speaking of crazy, I FINALLY got Chapter 28 done! Handy handy linky here: Barracks Under Fire - Chapter 28

I'm kind of upset that I won't be able to be on very much tomorrow as it is Madness Day, but my computer charger broke and the battery is dead so the only time I can get on tomorrow is while I'm at work and on the computer there. Thing is I can't really watch many movies because I'll be working and everything, but I'm going to try and catch a movie or two if I can.

At 9/21/09 10:48 PM, EagleRock wrote: It's gonna be crazy, I'll bet. I can't wait to see what happens at 12:01.

Oh, shit, that's tomorrow. I wonder if its too let to fake a flu so I can get out of school tomorrow. =P

Speaking of crazy, I FINALLY got Chapter 28 done! Handy handy linky here: Barracks Under Fire - Chapter 28

A very good chapter, but damn it Eagle, why must there always be a cliffhanger. You better hurry and post 29, haha.

At 9/21/09 08:50 PM, idiot-buster wrote: They are becomming more technical savvy more then ever now.

I agree, I think that these spammers are taking things WAY TOO FAR. You'd think that they'd take the admins' generosity to not ban them more nobly. As for the legality of hacking, I don't think there's a specific law to ban it, but the accused hackers may breach their ISP's terms of service contract. If thats the case, then I believe all Wade would have to do is report their activities to their ISP, in which case the ISP could refuse to continue their services to the offenders.

It'll be quite interesting to see how this all turns out, and best of luck to those who may have lost their accounts to malicious users.