At 5/16/09 12:01 AM, SlashFirestorm wrote:
In other news, I have locked the review reporting thread in the EGB forums, at least for the time being. I'm starting to become a little less sure that such a thread is a good idea. The potential for incorrect flagging (and thus wasting mods' time) is one of the reasons; that most reviews have a degree of ambiguousness in whether or not they're abusive is another.
I do see your point - it is very easy to get carried away on the "borderline" reviews, and then have a lot of people leech the list and whistle those that are too close to call. The whistle concept was designed to help the mods locate unacceptable flashes and reviews and remove them from NewGrounds. In theory, if everyone paid attention to what is abusive versus useless, then the mods would only get notified of those violators that need to be removed.
IMHO, I think that the general caliber of EGB members present a level of maturity that can handle whistling truly abusive reviews - but only if they stick to very strict guidelines that avoid gray areas, such as:
- Low scoring reviews that say BLAM this, curse the author or are offensive, and contain NO reference to the flash at hand. Example: "Blam this crap!" is abusive. But "The artwork sucked, surprised it wasn't blammed" is not.
- Reviews made up of long spam strings, ascii images or nonsense words that mean nothing are abusive.
- Reviews that promote other websites or programs and have nothing to do with the flash at hand.
...etc...
If we had a condensed and defined set of rules - no more than 10 - with explicit examples, and agreed that to whistle a flash, it must clearly violate these rules, no grey areas. If in doubt, leave it out. EGB members who wanted to add to the abusive reviews list would then have no reason to post borderline reviews. Also, instead of providing a link to a page and saying "a ton here", each one needs to be explicitly linked as to avoid confusion.
Assuming we could work all of this out, there is still the matter of your concern that this fosters "mass voting". Again, I can see and understand your point, but IMHO isn't it our purpose to help clean up the junk from Newgrounds? - and if a member finds something truly abusive, then we should act on it. If we don't, then what do we wait for? We're on the side of good, trying to help things here. We're not mass voters or completely ignorant stat whores that don't care what passes. We are the guard - and as the guard, we work together as a team - and we work well together at that.
I am not, for even a second, trying to undermine your authority here, Slash. Your word is law, and that's not being argued. All I am saying is that those of us under you are on your side, and want to do the right thing - and with the right amount of clarity, we can. The BBS on the "z4.invisionfree" site is mainly for our use. It's not as visible as the forums on Newgrounds. Oh, I am sure a handful of non-EGBers are trolling it, but the bulk of the NG community doesn't even know it exists.
So as long as we keep our house in order, I think the Abusive Review thread was doing more good than harm. But again, that's just my opinion, sir!
*Salutes*
(and then gets off his high horse)