At 6/29/06 11:56 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: Not only is it obvious, it could be misread as suggesting that you want your own account deleted.

Well, with the thread they know that isn't the case.

Maus was right, they're just looking for attention. You should just ignore them.

Meh, lamenumbers posted child pornographic pictures months ago, moderators and administrators were noticed, NOTHING happens.

Unlike some people, I can't stand rape and child abuse.

Be the person who accepts it, fine, but I don't.

At 6/29/06 11:56 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: Not only is it obvious, it could be misread as suggesting that you want your own account deleted.

I did mention that to Andersson, but...Meh.

Maus was right, they're just looking for attention. You should just ignore them.

Maybe we should ignore them, but I really think they shouldn't get away with posting child porn on Newgrounds. I would appreciate it if Wade dealt with those idiots, but I just don't think anything would be done about it soon. :|

At 6/29/06 12:33 PM, gumOnShoe wrote: E-mailing Wade or Pming him would be a better option and probably lead to more happening.

I did that and recently got an respons that proves that reminding them about this sure wasn't a bad idea.

At 6/29/06 12:40 PM, Andersson wrote:

At 6/29/06 12:33 PM, gumOnShoe wrote: E-mailing Wade or Pming him would be a better option and probably lead to more happening.

I did that and recently got an respons that proves that reminding them about this sure wasn't a bad idea.

What did you expect mentioning the SS to Wade?

At 6/29/06 12:48 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: What did you expect mentioning the SS to Wade?

Haha.

Well if people show that it is in their intrest that someone prioritates this, then I am sure that we'll see a lot more being done than if everyone's silent about it.

And the Star Syndicate already knows that they get attention from what they're doing, but when their main accounts now are voted for deletion, it isn't as funny anymore.

At 6/29/06 01:33 PM, gumOnShoe wrote: Obviously I didn't want to try it.

that's always been outwar style stuff.

At 6/29/06 01:09 PM, gumOnShoe wrote: I think we've all learned that the SS members who are causing the mischief don't give a rat's ass about any account they own on newgrounds.

The thing has been that they have an account that stays intact. Sure, those aren't deleted as of now because they need to gather all information the account got before they can delete it (This is obviously to track down alternative accounts in the futre, aswell as taking legal action against the spammers).

Anyways, even though this is the case, most of the accounts and so on are "on hold". That we care shows them that they need to prior this and with effort they'll be able to delete alternative accounts directly, instead of hanging onto them for the information.

What I am still waiting for though, is that Wade will completely ban the whole and every association to the Star Syndicate (Poor Tremour), and that way keep Portal corruptness at distance, and make it harder for them to fool through submissions and so on.

At 6/29/06 07:25 PM, gumOnShoe wrote: You are forgetting that Denvish is also technically a member.

Meh. In that case, almost every moderator is a member. XP

I don't think Wade could delete all the members or that he would since he has trusted some of them with spots such as moderator on this site.

Yeah, but those people who were trusted the spots as moderator and so on also didn't work up devious ideas to ruin the good experience of Newgrounds.

At 6/29/06 12:52 PM, Andersson wrote:

At 6/29/06 12:48 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: What did you expect mentioning the SS to Wade?

Haha.

Well if people show that it is in their intrest that someone prioritates this, then I am sure that we'll see a lot more being done than if everyone's silent about it.

And the Star Syndicate already knows that they get attention from what they're doing, but when their main accounts now are voted for deletion, it isn't as funny anymore.

here's an little clipping of the rules with the key infrmation bolded:

The "Big Ones"

There are two huge rules that you simply must follow. Breaking these rules is an automatic suspension. No warning, no nothing. You will most likely get the maximum suspension, too (currently 30 days) for breaking these simple rules.

a) Do NOT post porn or any "questionable" material on the NG BBS; if you would be uncomfortable or get into trouble for viewing it at work or at school, do not post it here.

I really think kiddi porn shouldnt be posted since it's illegal, impractical, and immoral. Repeat offences should really be delt with severely, even more so than a 30 day ban. Though if they try to use and alt to do it again, than all accounts will be gone for ever.

At 6/30/06 12:34 AM, MasterStalker wrote: I really think kiddi porn shouldnt be posted since it's illegal, impractical, and immoral. Repeat offences should really be delt with severely, even more so than a 30 day ban.

Yeah, well Tom and Wade are guilty to inform the FBI about this, which I am pretty sure they will.

Andersson, stop taking the actions of a very select few as representative of the entire SS.

At 6/30/06 06:18 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: Andersson, stop taking the actions of a very select few as representative of the entire SS.

The selected few who happens to be those running the Star Syndicate.

Say, in battle, the manner soldiers fight the war reflects upon their commanders. But nevertheless shall you expect, that wickedness of leaders means wickedness of men who join them by free will.

whats the deal with the pedophile signiture?

At 6/30/06 08:19 PM, Andersson wrote:

At 6/30/06 06:18 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: Andersson, stop taking the actions of a very select few as representative of the entire SS.

The selected few who happens to be those running the Star Syndicate.

Say, in battle, the manner soldiers fight the war reflects upon their commanders. But nevertheless shall you expect, that wickedness of leaders means wickedness of men who join them by free will.

What the fuck are you rattling on about? I know a lot of very good friends who are members of the SS, and they would never post child pornography. If you think that there is some kind of war going on, you are seriously mistaken. Stop trying to apply a war theme to this, and quit all the excessive hyperbole, it's fucking annoying. >:(

At 7/1/06 03:21 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:

At 6/30/06 08:19 PM, Andersson wrote: Say, in battle, the manner soldiers fight the war reflects upon their commanders. But nevertheless shall you expect, that wickedness of leaders means wickedness of men who join them by free will.

What the fuck are you rattling on about? I know a lot of very good friends who are members of the SS, and they would never post child pornography. If you think that there is some kind of war going on, you are seriously mistaken. Stop trying to apply a war theme to this, and quit all the excessive hyperbole, it's fucking annoying. >:(

I'm not picking sides here, but I think it was an example. And in alot of cases it's a true example. If the soldiers reflect on the officer, then it makes the officer look bad. But what if the officer reflects the whole group down to the lowest man? I think that were he's coming from.

Here's my version of it:

Say you're a teacher. All your students are scoring lowly. What are people going to see? Are you a bad teacher, or is the whole class just bad in general?

At 7/1/06 03:21 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: What the fuck are you rattling on about? I know a lot of very good friends who are members of the SS, and they would never post child pornography.

Good for you. I know people who are members of the Star Syndicate aswell. I don't hate them for being members of the SS either, but on the other hand, those aren't active to fag up the forums nor the Portal.

THEREFORE, they couldn't be forbidden when associating to Newgrounds since their activity within this group stays within the group and not all over this site to make unpleasant appearances.

If you think that there is some kind of war going on, you are seriously mistaken. Stop trying to apply a war theme to this, and quit all the excessive hyperbole, it's fucking annoying. >:(

It's called a metaphor.

Andersson, I hate to say it, but you are a prime example of why the Star Syndicate is a successful group. You're an internet dramatist.

At 7/1/06 02:10 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: Andersson, I hate to say it, but you are a prime example of why the Star Syndicate is a successful group. You're an internet dramatist.

If that is your final argument in this unagreement.

I don't want to argue more about the subject, my point of view remains.

The Star Syndicate aren't hurting anyone right now. So long as they don't post kiddy porn and make a big fuss on the BBS, I have no problem with their existance.

On another note, I've returned from a camp, only to leave for another in two days. I have an excuse....

And, does anyone know whatever happened to "new levels"? Do we have a date? Are we certain they'll arrive?

At 7/5/06 02:52 PM, DaSadGirl wrote: I'm not going to try to get into the whole SS problem. I just think that if anyone submits child pornography, they should get their account deleted. We can't blame the SS for fucking up the portal, just certain members.This is one of my new favorites, btw.

( 20

Daily secks.

Happy birthday gumOnShoe!

My birthday as well. :P

At 7/10/06 07:54 AM, gumOnShoe wrote: btw, unlike the edit button this actually happened.

do you have an unedited version?
because of your windows bar thing was there and stuff it looks more like a problem with yourcomputer loading stuff.

At 7/12/06 08:32 AM, gumOnShoe wrote: So..... who is making the thread ? ? ? >8)

there is no need for a thread, birthday threads are so annoying.

At 7/12/06 08:32 AM, gumOnShoe wrote:

At 7/12/06 06:54 AM, Bahamut- wrote: Happy birthday gumOnShoe!

My birthday as well. :P

Happy birthday Bahamut-

XD

So..... who is making the thread ? ? ? >8)

Oops, I didn't read this thread before I made bahamut's birthday thread, or I would've included you in it, sorry :(

At 7/12/06 09:33 AM, gumOnShoe wrote:

At 7/12/06 09:19 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: Oops, I didn't read this thread before I made bahamut's birthday thread, or I would've included you in it, sorry :(

Just an internet thread :)

Yeah, but just to spite madknt, it's a really good and purposeful internet thread.

Bah, sorry gumOnShoe and Bahamut- for not congratulating you untill now... =(

Happy belated birthday to you two!

At 7/12/06 01:41 PM, Andersson wrote: Happy belated birthday to you two!

It's still their birthday for another 6 hours or so. :\

At 7/12/06 01:45 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: It's still their birthday for another 6 hours or so. :\

True. I'm tired, be easy on me.

At 7/12/06 09:40 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:

At 7/12/06 09:33 AM, gumOnShoe wrote:

At 7/12/06 09:19 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: Oops, I didn't read this thread before I made bahamut's birthday thread, or I would've included you in it, sorry :(

Just an internet thread :)

Yeah, but just to spite madknt, it's a really good and purposeful internet thread.

love you to BBM, ill give you spite >:(
nah, its all good..
BIRTHDAY THREADS FOR ALL!

At 7/12/06 01:41 PM, Andersson wrote: Happy belated birthday to you two!

Thanks, but that was nothing belated. XP Yeah, my birthday is over now, but I got myself loads of money (£125).

And thanks for making that birthday thread for me BBM.