At 12/3/04 06:18 PM, agatio wrote: Ladies and gentelmen, as of now, I am now an Elite Guard Sergeant 1st Class. And my voting power is now 7.19 votes.

Soon I will break 4000 votes. I will report back once I do that.

Shit! I meant 4000 blams! You'd think Wade Fulp would give us an "Edit Post" option.

At 12/3/04 06:22 PM, agatio wrote: Shit! I meant 4000 blams! You'd think Wade Fulp would give us an "Edit Post" option.

No, that would really screw up the BBS.

I finally unlocked the third secret. Yay for me.

At 12/3/04 06:22 PM, agatio wrote:

Soon I will break 4000 votes. I will report back once I do that.

Shit! I meant 4000 blams! You'd think Wade Fulp would give us an "Edit Post" option.

1)It would Lijim's job.
2)He will never do it and he already typed why approximately 150 times.
Don't even bother asking him again.

If people could modify their posts, they could type something like:

-I like this mod.

the next person to post types: -me too

then the first poster changes his post to the opposite:

-I hate blahblah

the second sentence is still : - me too

then they get both banned even if the second guy didn't deserve it.

I could continue showing many situations where an edit button would be more trouble than anything else so I'm sure that a mistake in a post isn't that bad compared to what could happen with an edit button.

a good idea would be to give an edit post option to specific users, but if they abuse that then they can just have that removed. i'm sure liljim is capable of doing that. But only users who are trustworthy can have the option to edit their posts.

At 12/3/04 06:48 PM, EKRegulus wrote:

At 12/3/04 06:22 PM, agatio wrote:

Soon I will break 4000 votes. I will report back once I do that.

Shit! I meant 4000 blams! You'd think Wade Fulp would give us an "Edit Post" option.

1)It would Lijim's job.
2)He will never do it and he already typed why approximately 150 times.
Don't even bother asking him again.

I didn't ask Liljim anything.

If people could modify their posts, they could type something like:

-I like this mod.

the next person to post types: -me too

then the first poster changes his post to the opposite:

-I hate blahblah

the second sentence is still : - me too

then they get both banned even if the second guy didn't deserve it.

Damn, that would really suck. An innocent being punished for someone else's actions

I could continue showing many situations where an edit button would be more trouble than anything else so I'm sure that a mistake in a post isn't that bad compared to what could happen with an edit button.

I had no idea that adding an edit button would cause so much trouble. I withdraw my statement about adding the damn thing.

At 12/3/04 07:01 PM, YoinK_VineS wrote: a good idea would be to give an edit post option to specific users, but if they abuse that then they can just have that removed. i'm sure liljim is capable of doing that. But only users who are trustworthy can have the option to edit their posts.

Nope, he won't trust anyone. The best idea that we gave him was to be able to edit but the old message would still appear so they know what was your first reply. The message and the edit would both have a date so the mods and admins would know if the users that responded to him replied before or after the edit.

He said many times and that he won't even trust the mods so forget your idea. :D

At 12/3/04 07:07 PM, agatio wrote: I didn't ask Liljim anything.

I know but I thought that you would do it so I stopped you before you did :). I have no idea why you typed Wade, Lijim would be the guy that implements that kind of stuff for the forum because he's the programmer.

Damn, that would really suck. An innocent being punished for someone else's actions

Indeed, that example was given by Lijim. I just typed one of his arguments.

I had no idea that adding an edit button would cause so much trouble. I withdraw my statement about adding the damn thing.

hey, everyone makes that mistake :P Guess how many times it was asked? hahaha

Or maybe have an edit post for everyone.. but only have the edit button for 5 minutes after the post and then after 5 minutes then a user cannot edit their post. Sometimes after viewing the post after it has been posted makes people aware that they've made a mistake. I know i've made a few mistakes in my posts in the past and so has several others.

At 12/3/04 07:25 PM, YoinK_VineS wrote: Or maybe have an edit post for everyone.. but only have the edit button for 5 minutes after the post and then after 5 minutes then a user cannot edit their post. Sometimes after viewing the post after it has been posted makes people aware that they've made a mistake. I know i've made a few mistakes in my posts in the past and so has several others.

It takes 5 seconds to post a short reply and it also takes 5 seconds to edit a post . A short discussion could turn out into something ugly if the first edits right after a few replies his post and the second one typed that he agrees before the edit. The second guy might be busy or posting somewhere else so he might not notice it before an admin or a mod.

The mod or the admin that will see the posts has no idea about what was modified so he doesn't know to what the second guy agrees. He will probably assumes that they second would agree with the offensive post that wasn't one before the edit and he will ban both.

My example was for 2 people but more could agree and more will unfairly banned.

Whenever they will try to explain themselves to an admin or a mod, the admin or the mod won't believe him because the proof that he was agreeing to something else would be gone.

.. so Yoink, is it still a good idea? :P

At 12/3/04 07:56 PM, EKRegulus wrote: Whenever they will try to explain themselves to an admin or a mod, the admin or the mod won't believe him because the proof that he was agreeing to something else would be gone.

.. so Yoink, is it still a good idea? :P

Disposing of the evidence so to speak (lol). Hey Regulus, would editing a post affect bandwidth in the same manner as posting does? Would the addition of an edit button cause the system to run slower?

At 12/3/04 08:14 PM, Recon_Rebel wrote: Disposing of the evidence so to speak (lol). Hey Regulus, would editing a post affect bandwidth in the same manner as posting does? Would the addition of an edit button cause the system to run slower?

pfff my post has a few mistakes. I type "they" and then "him" O_o. I still maintain my position though. I would prefer to check my posts instead of using an edit button. I had one good suggestion where both messages (first and the edited parts) stay there but ummm I dunno, it could still give some trouble to the admins, especially for a reason: the posts would start getting mega-long. No solutions seem perfect :(

oh yeah that paragraph wasn't a reply to you recon. haha

Reply to Recon:
Well, I guess it would slow it down a little bit but that's a question that you should ask to Lijim. I never maintained a forum so I don't know.

OMG GFOX DOES A BIT OF CATCHUP FROM PRE-THANKSGIVING (PAGES 842-846ISH)

First off... congrats on making the top 50, Bonus. I meant to say that awhile ago, but it never came up in any of our back-n-forths in my topics. I noticed you crowing about it in here while catching up. #;-}>

And... congrats to SK on Praporshchik and to _altr_ on THE HOLY LEVEL 24 ICON... and... Congrats to everyone else on every other cool achievement, too!

At 11/21/04 01:20 AM, EKRegulus wrote: I vote 0 when
A)It's against the rules ex: stolen, malicious, etc.

You shouldn't vote 0 on stolen flash unless the FLASH ITSELF deserves it. As the whistle text lets you know, you should vote what the movie deserves and let the WHISTLE tell the admins it's stolen, not your vote, capisce? Just wanted to clarify that for you and anyone else who automatically hits 0 on stolen flash, however GOOD the flash is.

If the stolen flash is later reassigned to the REAL author, he's going to be hurt by your 0 votes, so that's why that's a rule.

If he deserved it then good job. He shouldn't lower the score of good submissions for no reason or for the lame reasons he probably had.
Did he learn from that situation or did he just walk away? Anyway, don't tell me who it was, I guess that it doesn't concern me.

His name is AnusBoy. I finally remembered it. aka sanderail or TheSander.

At 11/21/04 08:52 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: It was like that for me around there but im glad im in my #144 spot, also today i finnaly got another vp point so now im at 9.99 maybe in another week ill hit the big 10.00 and probably level 18 aswell only need 37 more experience till then, and as for reviews i hit 9,400 today cool cool...

I was right about that back on 11/21, BTW... FINALLY moved up from 160/159 to 158 a week ago or so, then to 157 by passing Zenxin (WOW) when he missed two deposits... and NOW... I'm going to be moving up to 156 and 155 either tomorrow or soon (me = 7760, two people who haven't moved in a few days = 7770)... and after that, there's even MORE slow/non-moving people to pass.

I should hit the top 150 in January. I HOPE, at least. I'm coming for you and Crono, X! BEWARE! #;-}>

At 11/21/04 09:04 AM, BonusStage wrote: I swear on it, when i came, round April's time, or it may have been May by the time i understood b/s heh, fixit already had the 49501 (with the other 2 points coming after the huge Wade deletion thatmade d0gma leave for a time :) and ramagi had again started, since she wasn't at 36000, but the lead was at least 11,000, but i remember 12,000, but hey maybe i'm wrong *shrugs*

Well, okay. But I'd wager it was in the 11-12k range, not over 12k. If I really MUST do so, I'll go check my files. I have almost EVERY day's top 50 b/p list saved, so I can find out how far apart the both of them were during that period, if I MUST do so to resolve that. #;-}>

... okay, that's it. :::ends reply to Bonus due to overinsanity:::

YOU BASTARD ))):::<<<<

Whoops!

At 11/22/04 02:09 PM, MPA wrote:

At 11/22/04 06:19 AM, BonusStage wrote: OMG NOT ANOTHER ONE *DIES*

Am I missing some? (after a quick think, i got) Denvish, Carmel, Syme and I are the only pipes around these parts and Denvish only has a few days left. Or maybe you're a pipe hater and any new pipe is bad news, yes that's probably it.

Of COURSE any new pipe is bad news. I won't be happy until ALL the regs around here are levels 15+. Sadly, that will NEVER happen. ;_;

At 11/23/04 05:23 PM, _matt_ wrote: OMFG I GOT THAT LINE UNDERNEATH MY TRIANGLE BADGE OMFG!!!

TRIANGLE badge?!? Oy... that's called a CHEVRON, or at the very least, a stripe.

:::shakes head sadly:::

At 11/23/04 07:58 PM, BonusStage wrote:

At 11/23/04 04:09 PM, EKRegulus wrote: and then gfox educated us about reviews. It was boring. :D

indeed :D

OMG!!! YOU TWO ARE BANNINATED!!!

Wow, the post that I just typed is stupider than anything I typed before.
Anyway, *post it*.

Pfft, gfox = better at silly posts ^.^

That's right. You tell him!

Next time, though, stick up for me when he says my pedantic rants are boring, okay? #;-}>

Then you won't be banninated!

At 11/27/04 04:46 AM, Acid-Rain wrote: Yes, I'd say that the whistle is not that much of a big deal. What use is it anyways? Plus its nearly impossible to even get gold, which leaves open diety. I'm not quite sure, does gfoxcook have the diety or gold? I guess I had better check on that.

I am as close to gold right now as I have ever been...

but I have never HAD gold or deity. I was normal for the first two days of the whistle system and then became silver on the third day. And I've been silver ever since. Just increasing my power and getting closer and closer to gold ever since.

I think that Wade should add some more whistle ranks such as platinum, tin, aluminum, just to vary the users alittle more. It may make users want to get better whistles and actually care about them (thinking they actually have a chance at a new rank). It will cut back on all of these abusive reveiws coming in.

That would be nice, yes.

Also I hate the fact that people can write horrible/spammy reveiws, on movies that are going to be blammed, and get away with it. Any commentary?

They don't get away with it ALL the time. Only when no review mods are online. Just ask BonusStage about that.

At 11/28/04 04:00 PM, Denvish wrote:

At 11/28/04 03:46 PM, Inuzuka-Kiba wrote:

Everyone has his own style.

Not me, my posts suck. ;_;

I preferred your posting before you started all this gfox/Bonus business of multi-replies. I used to read your posts, now, I'm not sure I can be bothered; it's too intense

;_; Does this mean you don't read my posts, either? Or when I do it... is it not too intense? #;-}>

Besides, you can't call his style, at least up to that point... gfox/Bonus style. gfox + Bonus actually space their multi-quote replies properly, they don't run them all together carmel-style like Inuzuka does/was doing. #;-}>

At 11/28/04 06:01 PM, BonusStage wrote:

At 11/28/04 04:54 PM, Inuzuka-Kiba wrote: Also, for those of you who don't like how I don't add spaces...too bad. >=P My posts would look too empty if I put spaces between quotes and such. >_< Too much grey/gray. =(

Hmm, gfox likes it that way, so it must be right :D, but Kiba likes it this way ... but its not gfox's way, so it must be wrong *OMG DIES*

It's not MY way. It's THE way.

Ever since usenet started in the late 70s and early 80s... all SANE users of a BBS/newsgroup have been typing WITH SPACES BETWEEN PARAGRAPHS. It's the only way to do it and preserve the sanity of the READERS you're presumably typing your messages to. Otherwise, what's the point? O_O

At 11/28/04 10:41 PM, Recon_Rebel wrote: I'm trying to post using a combination of both single and multiple replies Denvish. Usually my first post in the lounge is gfox style and then after that I turn it down a notch. Mix is good (and this is coming from a raspberry cider fan).

That's exactly right.

And that's how I post in MY topics and other topics I post in often enough that I can make one BIG multi-quote reply to catch up... and then "turn it down a notch" for replies later that day, for instance.

The problem is that I don't post in level up! often enough anymore to really stay caught-up long enough to ease into a less-lengthy post mode here. I come here every week or so and post big catch-up posts... and maybe I'll follow it up with ONE reply to someone who replies shortly afterwards... and then I'm gone for dozens of pages again, so of course the next time I return, it's another big gfox-style catch-up post. :::shrugs:::

DONE WITH THE CATCHUP! HOOOOORAY!

At 12/1/04 07:33 PM, Inuzuka-Kiba wrote: Hmm, Ramagi, I wasn't here that early to see Wade a such a high level. It was most likely early on when it was easy to level up correct? For he's now only level 18. What was the highest he had? Just curious. He must have been slacking in the depositing area to drop that far back. O_o

I remember him best at level 21. I can't remember the highest I ever SAW him at... but I'm pretty sure he was in the high 20s once. Back when the profile system was fresh in 2000.

Dammit gfox, you always seem to get to things like that before I do. First you end up having already located all the older profiles with low ids,

that's true... sorry about that one.

and now you're ahead of me trying to read through this thread. >_< I've gotten through 1-189 and 689-862. Bah, everytime when I think I'm doing something no one else has bothered with I always find out you've already done it. ;_;

Hey now. I didn't suddenly DECIDE to read everything. I've been ACTIVELY POSTING IN THIS THREAD since like page 90. I started posting in here in March 2003. I didn't NEED to go back and read everything. I was hanging OUT in here all the time, hard as that may be to believe with how rarely I drop by nowadays.

Anyway, I'm caught up on 842-862 now, thankfully.

189-689 had some pretty good times in it, man. You should definitely read that chunk, too. :::nods:::

But it's funny seeing people like Recon say things like "I'M A LEVEL 11 NOW!!!". Probably because I'm so used to them being at high levels.

How is it that you didn't notice my posts back in that 1-189 page chunk, eh? #;-}>

ANYWAY. 7400. Woot woot.

Congrats to agatio for EGSFC, SK for 2k saves, DDG for 5k posts and gfox for posting in here once in a while.

At 12/3/04 07:28 AM, Slightly_Crazy_Dude wrote: Qwoxyl, thanks for putting a downer on me buddy, no more hands till 06, man, the gauntlet better be worth it when we get there :D

I'm looking more forward to level 16 than the shiny gauntlets. They are sweet, but with the nunchaku will at least make 2005 enjoyable, at least the end of it since the pipe isn't enjoyable.

At 12/3/04 11:02 AM, Tom_s00 wrote:

At 12/3/04 01:17 AM, Qwoxyl wrote: LEVEL UP!

Huge congrats Qwoxyl, i hate to say it but level 13 in here has become like the level 9 of the general forum. not to make it any less cool than it is though.

Yeah, too many bats around, but it's the first weapon, and General doesn't have such a high bat to regular user ratio, so if I could (but probably won't) go there.

And we all know the main reason why level 13 is so good.

?

Don't tell me you haven't seen any posts from anyone becoming level 13. "I've got ...." should be a very very very very huge hint.

At 12/3/04 10:39 PM, gfoxcook wrote: You shouldn't vote 0 on stolen flash unless the FLASH ITSELF deserves it. *The rules*

If the stolen flash is later reassigned to the REAL author, he's going to be hurt by your 0 votes, so that's why that's a rule.

I usally just whistle those. I actualy don't vote on those for the most part there are a few stolen ones I'll vote 2-5 beacause I didn't know at the time they were stolen.

I am as close to gold right now as I have ever been...

Hey I havn''t marked a review today. :)
I been doing other things, I did ban a couple of morons.

At 12/3/04 10:39 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 11/21/04 01:20 AM, EKRegulus wrote: I vote 0 when
A)It's against the rules ex: stolen, malicious, etc.

You shouldn't vote 0 on stolen flash unless the FLASH ITSELF deserves it. As the whistle text lets you know, you should vote what the movie deserves and let the WHISTLE tell the admins it's stolen, not your vote, capisce? Just wanted to clarify that for you and anyone else who automatically hits 0 on stolen flash, however GOOD the flash is.

I never whistle flashes simply because I don't trust my judgement :O. I'm never sure so I prefer to ignore the whistle for flashes. It's better to ignore it than to whistle flashes that don't deserve it, right? so I don't take the risk.
Most whistles that I gained where from abusive reviews linked in the abusive reviews thread.

I rarely vote 0 for that reason because ... I rarely realize that the flash is stolen or malicious :O. I mostly watch the flash and vote the quality. I don't think about the malicious, stolen, whatever could it be unless it's very obvious.

If the stolen flash is later reassigned to the REAL author, he's going to be hurt by your 0 votes, so that's why that's a rule.

Don't they usually get blammed and then the real author submits it? so the admins can transfer a flash from one person to another? What the hell did you mean?

His name is AnusBoy. I finally remembered it. aka sanderail or TheSander.

I didn't ask for his username ;O. I just wanted to know what happened.

At 11/23/04 07:58 PM, BonusStage wrote:

At 11/23/04 04:09 PM, EKRegulus wrote: and then gfox educated us about reviews. It was boring. :D

indeed :D

OMG!!! YOU TWO ARE BANNINATED!!!

Oh really? testing right now :D

Wow, the post that I just typed is stupider than anything I typed before.
Anyway, *post it*.

Pfft, gfox = better at silly posts ^.^

That's right. You tell him!

I thought that it was my worst post ever but I beat it lately. Awesome, isn't it? .. oh wait.. it's not :(

Next time, though, stick up for me when he says my pedantic rants are boring, okay? #;-}>
Then you won't be banninated!

OGMOGMGOGM we are banninated O_o :D

By the way, why do you reply to my old posts? I don't even remember posting that. :O

At 12/3/04 07:56 PM, EKRegulus wrote: .. so Yoink, is it still a good idea? :P

or perhaps a way in which a user can just delete their own post rather than editing it to save the trouble. Then if the post is deleted, who cares if the original post was against bbs rules?

At 12/4/04 01:05 AM, YoinK_VineS wrote:

At 12/3/04 07:56 PM, EKRegulus wrote: .. so Yoink, is it still a good idea? :P

or perhaps a way in which a user can just delete their own post rather than editing it to save the trouble. Then if the post is deleted, who cares if the original post was against bbs rules?

I sure the Mods and NG staff do. I never liked the idea of an edit button. Due to the potential abuse.

At 12/4/04 01:05 AM, YoinK_VineS wrote: or perhaps a way in which a user can just delete their own post rather than editing it to save the trouble. Then if the post is deleted, who cares if the original post was against bbs rules?

Bad idea, some important information would be lost. People couldn't follow the topic because posts that contribute and that were quoted aren't there anymore.

Even worse: a user could bash bigtime another one. Piss the other user off until it becomes a really ugly flamewar and before a mod or an admin notices it, he deletes all his posts. Then he says that nothing bad happened and the mods won't have a good reaon to ban him because they don't know what happened. Sure, the quotes could help but some parts will miss and that could be an advantage for the user that abused the system.

You could add a timer to that deleting option but it can still be abused.

At 12/4/04 01:05 AM, YoinK_VineS wrote:

At 12/3/04 07:56 PM, EKRegulus wrote: .. so Yoink, is it still a good idea? :P

or perhaps a way in which a user can just delete their own post rather than editing it to save the trouble. Then if the post is deleted, who cares if the original post was against bbs rules?

The person who responded to that post.

Example.

At some time, I wrote:

At 12/4/04 01:06 AM, YoinK_VineS wrote: Hateful comment

You shouldn't be so mean. Blah blah blah.

Then you delete your post, and someone sees me responding to a post that isn't there. They come to the (wrong) conclusion that I wrote "At 12/4/04...." and flame me for making a fake post so I could tell you off or try to get you banned (this actually happens already when a mod deletes a post). Then someone tries to get me banned, even though I haven't done anything wrong.

I just found out EK said this and more, but I still think that editing posts is a bad idea. If you want to do something about your posts, spell check them before posting. It's been said a billion times, but prevention is the best solution.

At 12/4/04 01:13 AM, ramagi wrote:

At 12/4/04 01:05 AM, YoinK_VineS wrote:

At 12/3/04 07:56 PM, EKRegulus wrote: .. so Yoink, is it still a good idea? :P

or perhaps a way in which a user can just delete their own post rather than editing it to save the trouble. Then if the post is deleted, who cares if the original post was against bbs rules?

I think thats a pretty good idea, as if they stuff up theyre post, they delete it, then post it again with the correct version, but ppl should just check they post b4 they post it. It makes sense.

I sure the Mods and NG staff do. I never liked the idea of an edit button. Due to the potential abuse.

The edit button should never be introduced to NG BBS, ppl will be spamming away.

Woah, nice job Foxsphere. 13,000 is a lot. Also when I clicked onto your profile I noticed you had 3,800 protects as well. Du bist auf dem Ball. =D

Nice job Gooch. I may be ahead in experience, but you're creaming me in that b/p department. I'll catch up, just you wait. =D

Yeah Ramagi, it does seem that there has been a steady flow of random users coming in here and making useless comments, many have been alts....*cough*BonusStage*cough**hack**wheeze*choke*die* ;_;

Qwoxyl (sp?) great job earning the bat. It's pretty hard to get out of there annoying hands nowadays. But you've gotten along just fine. =D

Well congrats SK. 2,000 protects is a lot. In fact it's not too far off from me. STAY BACK. >=( Hehe, keep up the good work, just don't pass me.

Well congrats DareDevilGuy on your successful posting. 5,000 is a lot, and it take a ton of patience. Too bad you skipped the screenie. Looks as if you'll have to wait for 5,555 posts then. =D

Happy late 17th birthday -TRA-! =D I disabled that. =P

Nice job tottie. 5,000 blams is a lot of work and effort, yet you managed to miss the screen too. 5,555 for all!! =D

Well SCD nice to know that you don't have to deal with a malfunctioning computer anymore. That's always good news. =D

Congrats on your rank up agatio. B/ping always seems to be harder as you get up there, but every rank makes that vp rise threw the roof. Hope to see your 4,000 blams soon. =D

Dammit, you just had to bring up the edit button thing again. Here's the bottom line: We haven't had it, we don't have it, and we never will have it. >=(

Yes yes gfox I know to read the rest. That's what I'm in the process of doing. I'm sure it'll be a "light" read for this Sunday. XD

I don't whistle flash very much, I'm not good at locating stolen flash, and the malicious junk I just blam. Whistle points are dead to me.

Well there's my late update for today. I'm sorry I totally didn't even make a post on the 3rd itself. But this is basically my post for December 3rd. For I woke up late this morning and had no time to post and then after school I had to go visit my mom who just had surgeury. ;_; Well nothing really special happening with my NG account.

Side note to SK: I told you. It always happens. You start to get closer to me in b/p then drop back. Like I said; hovering. =D

At 12/4/04 02:17 AM, Inuzuka-Kiba wrote: Side note to SK: I told you. It always happens. You start to get closer to me in b/p then drop back. Like I said; hovering. =D

I prefer to call it a distraction. Namely, I've gotten really active with Retrogade lately, and it's caused my b/p rate to tumble. So nyah! :-p

At 12/4/04 04:11 AM, ShittyKitty wrote: I prefer to call it a distraction.

...or obsession ;-D

Well done to the following peeps:

SlowBro - 3000 exp
Inuzuka-Kiba - Top 150 BP rank
_altr_ - Level 24
BonusStage - 5555 posts
EKRegulus - EG First Lieutenant
Slightly_Crazy_Dude - Top 500 BP rank, working computer!!!
carmelhadinosaur - RL Birthday, many happy (belated) returns
Foxphere - 13000 blams
Gooch_20-04 - Level 11
Qwoxyl - Level 13
ShittyKitty - 2000 saves
DareDevilGuy - 5000 posts
deck_head_tottie - 5000 blams
agatio - EG Sergeant First Class
-king-o-games- - Level 9 (?)

---------------------------------------------

At 12/3/04 10:41 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 11/28/04 04:00 PM, Denvish wrote: I preferred your posting before you started all this gfox/Bonus business of multi-replies. I used to read your posts, now, I'm not sure I can be bothered; it's too intense

;_; Does this mean you don't read my posts, either? Or when I do it... is it not too intense? #;-}>

Your posts aren't as intense, because you add spacing. My main difficulty with reading your stuff is the sheer volume of it (ie. 1-3 loooong posts in pretty much every topic) when you play your catch-up game. I generally ignore the review-related ones anyway, but it can still be quite intimidating keeping up with your catchups.

---------------------------------------

Once again, nothing of major interest to declare. Slowly working my way up the top 50 BP, hit 1500 posts yesterday, but neither really deserves celebration or even acknowledgement

At 12/4/04 12:36 AM, ramagi wrote: I usally just whistle those. I actualy don't vote on those for the most part there are a few stolen ones I'll vote 2-5 beacause I didn't know at the time they were stolen.

Ahh. Well, I tend to vote first and then whistle. I often miss out on the whistle that way, though. If I remember to, I whistle first and THEN vote, but I don't usually remember to. #;-}>

I am as close to gold right now as I have ever been...

Hey I havn''t marked a review today. :)
I been doing other things, I did ban a couple of morons.

By as close as I've ever been... I meant: "not very." #;-}>

And yeah, I noticed your banninations, just as you noticed at least one of my 4. It seems like you and I are the only review mods using the review mod log topic anymore. ;_;

And yeah and yeah, I did notice you didn't mark the reviews of the morons I noticed you'd banned... some reviews were still at 0/0, but don't worry... I fixed that nice and quick.

Still, even if you retire from super-marking duties, the chances of me hitting gold before... say... hitting level 19... are very, very low. #;-}>

At 12/4/04 12:45 AM, EKRegulus wrote: I never whistle flashes simply because I don't trust my judgement :O. I'm never sure so I prefer to ignore the whistle for flashes. It's better to ignore it than to whistle flashes that don't deserve it, right? so I don't take the risk.
Most whistles that I gained where from abusive reviews linked in the abusive reviews thread.

I understand your fear. I tend to only whistle when I'm sure as well. That's why I don't whistle very much flash. But I do mark a lot of abusive reviews, so that's why I do okay when it comes to WP...

Anyway, I was just responding to your "I vote 0 when A)It's against the rules ex: stolen, malicious, etc." thing from a couple weeks ago, that's all. Wanted to make sure you knew not to vote 0 on stolen flash by default, and for anyone else who was doing it at all.

Don't they usually get blammed and then the real author submits it? so the admins can transfer a flash from one person to another? What the hell did you mean?

:::shrugs::: man, I wouldn't know, I'm not an admin. I'm just telling you what the admins say to do. After you whistle a stolen movie, it TELLS you to vote what you think the movie itself deserves, and not to try to punish the thief with a 0 vote. That's all I'm saying.

His name is AnusBoy. I finally remembered it. aka sanderail or TheSander.

I didn't ask for his username ;O. I just wanted to know what happened.

I didn't say you asked for it. I wanted to say it back in November and couldn't think of it. I have since run across the name again so now I remember. Voila!

OMG!!! YOU TWO ARE BANNINATED!!!

Oh really? testing right now :D

hahahahaha. no.

Then you won't be banninated!

OGMOGMGOGM we are banninated O_o :D

THIS TIME I'LL LET IT SLIDE.

MAYBE.

By the way, why do you reply to my old posts? I don't even remember posting that. :O

Because that's called "catching up."

Of course you posted it, ya big silly amnesiac! I don't forge quotes.

At 12/4/04 04:11 AM, ShittyKitty wrote:

At 12/4/04 02:17 AM, Inuzuka-Kiba wrote: Side note to SK: I told you. It always happens. You start to get closer to me in b/p then drop back. Like I said; hovering. =D

I prefer to call it a distraction. Namely, I've gotten really active with Retrogade lately, and it's caused my b/p rate to tumble. So nyah! :-p

Ahhhh, the wonders of adminhood.

Just take a look at how many people you passed on today's top 500 VP list due to a b/p rankup.... and then tell me that you don't care about b/p because you're too busy with RG.

GO ON! I DARES YA.

RG ain't got NOTHING like the thrill of a VP climb. Of course, I suppose you could change that, Mr. Admin. #;-}> Adding VP to the PS Portal would be pretty nifty... you already added review responses and (not)helpful review marking, after all.

At 12/4/04 04:59 AM, Denvish wrote: Your posts aren't as intense, because you add spacing. My main difficulty with reading your stuff is the sheer volume of it (ie. 1-3 loooong posts in pretty much every topic) when you play your catch-up game. I generally ignore the review-related ones anyway, but it can still be quite intimidating keeping up with your catchups.

Yeah, it was after I wrote my faux-upset response that I realised that's what you meant by intense, not the size of the overall post.

However intimidating my catchups are... they don't compare to trying to read 20 pages of level up! like I just did yesterday. Hmph. #;-}>

Once again, nothing of major interest to declare. Slowly working my way up the top 50 BP, hit 1500 posts yesterday, but neither really deserves celebration or even acknowledgement

Passing 12 people in VP ranks is nothing of major interest?!?!? #;-}>

At 12/4/04 04:14 AM, RedCircle wrote:

At 12/4/04 04:11 AM, ShittyKitty wrote: I prefer to call it a distraction.

...or obsession ;-D

I would say RC that SK's RG was an addiction :P :) Not an obsession.

At 12/3/04 11:36 PM, Qwoxyl wrote: Yeah, too many bats around, but it's the first weapon, and General doesn't have such a high bat to regular user ratio, so if I could (but probably won't) go there.

It is a step up in the levels by being the first weapon, i think you get bit more respect around the BBS if your level 13 upwards.

Don't tell me you haven't seen any posts from anyone becoming level 13. "I've got ...." should be a very very very very huge hint.

Ohhhhhh yer sorry i must have miss understood your first post.

At 12/4/04 08:27 AM, BonusStage wrote: woah woah woah, two of my posts .... they were just deleted while i was typing that last post o.0, that may be the most errie thing i've seen a a while :\. As for the picture i was supposed to have last time :). A two pair and how about dueces be wild ;)

That confused me for a second , i clicked your profile to see this PPD number, when i saw your post count was at 5555, in your profile but on the page it was 5554, most weird.

At 12/4/04 06:49 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

By as close as I've ever been... I meant: "not very." #;-}>

And yeah, I noticed your banninations, just as you noticed at least one of my 4. It seems like you and I are the only review mods using the review mod log topic anymore. ;_;

And yeah and yeah, I did notice you didn't mark the reviews of the morons I noticed you'd banned... some reviews were still at 0/0, but don't worry... I fixed that nice and quick.

Still, even if you retire from super-marking duties, the chances of me hitting gold before... say... hitting level 19... are very, very low. #;-}>

I'm not really retired, I am actually taking the time I would use to mark reviews for other things. I still get a few here and there. I just want to spend my time doing otehr things. Since the title is mostly secure.

At 12/3/04 11:36 PM, Qwoxyl wrote:
I'm looking more forward to level 16 than the shiny gauntlets. They are sweet, but with the nunchaku will at least make 2005 enjoyable, at least the end of it since the pipe isn't enjoyable.

Yeah well, im not fussy, i dont really vcare what level im at, aslong as it is up the way :) Nunchuks are cool, but i like the pipe aswell, its kinda growing on me for some reason. Meh, gauntlet by 06 doesnt sound to bad :)

At 12/4/04 04:59 AM, Denvish wrote:
Slightly_Crazy_Dude - Top 500 BP rank, working computer!!!

Fucking aye !!! Thanks alot for your help buddy, it was kinda your fault its working, so i thank j00.