At 8/3/04 09:39 PM, j00bie wrote:
I dont think I plan on JUST blamming anytime soon, I dont think it's worth ignoring save points and trying to JUST get blam points.
I think i'll stick with my current method of simply trying to rank up as fast as I can, :D.
At 8/3/04 11:06 PM, BonusStage wrote:
but i DEFINETELY probably won't be getting on either of the % lists, with the numbers you just presented to me, that would take forever it seems, anyways i always try to vote according to what i see, and what i see has so far brought me to my current percentages, too bad ^_^
In the long run, IMO, it's better off continuing with voting on everything as you have decided. I wanted to at least present the idea of making one of the percentage lists, just in case it was more important to you to make another list. Since you didn't "get it" when I first brought it up, well ... two novellas later, there ya are ;)
By the way, does
DEFINETELY probably
have any relation to a "possible maybe?" ^^
At 8/3/04 11:12 PM, j00bie wrote:
Depending on when you do your next update, I doubt ill get a double rank up >:(/
This weekend, as I mentioned last page :-P~~~
At 8/4/04 04:22 AM, FlGMENT wrote:
Besides, who says the ranks will continue on from EGSC? They might mix a few minor ones into the mix and still have EGSC as the final rank. After all, Supreme Commander is an awesome name for the final rank.
IMO I think this is the route they will take if they do add more ranks. It's entirely possible a Field Marshall or some such will get inserted between General and Supreme Commander, but I think that's the highest they would insert a new one. What the values required to reach a rank in any new system is an open question, but a lot of them would be going up ... in the worst case scenario, scaling against the SC. The real headache for them would be developing a new VP bonus system for them if they wished to maintain 60% as the max ... along with all the people who start whining about lost VP when it is implemented.