At 9/17/03 04:51 PM, jonthomson wrote:At 9/17/03 04:37 PM, demon0 wrote:as I said in the post RIGHT before I pasted the listSorry about that. No its alright you dont have to update anything, or go out of your way, Ive been a pain already.
"Here's an updated chart. If anyone else wants on it (or wants to update their info), reply with total reviews and responses, please:"
So anyway, if you want me to change you to 920, you've got to tell me how many have responses, too. Hm?
... no you haven't. I just don't like it when people completely miss a major point of my post. (For hopefully the last time:) PLEASE tell me your response number along WITH your review number (which I can always find out on my own if necessary, but I can't find out your responses easily) if you want to be on the list.
Up to 604/42 now... I've slowed down a bit, what with creating the list (now around 270 people) and IE giving me random WSOD's when loading flash meaning I can't load some flash (esp. stuff in the <200 list). I've had at least two reviews with responses deleted recently.
THERE we go. Thank you for including all relevant info in your request for an update, jon. Lightning seems to want me to post the list in your thread. You okay with that? I told him I wouldn't unless you wanted them there.
At 9/17/03 05:29 PM, XkwiziTOnE wrote:At 9/17/03 04:35 PM, gfoxcook wrote:Hoow do I rank among the you with the review and response ratio????.........
... ARGHGHGHGH! I don't know, man. You've got to....
TELL
ME
YOUR
RESPONSE
NUMBER
(from your grounds gold screen)
since I can't see it myself. capisce? #;-}>
gfox // wi/ht?#9 // defunct PentaList (final update: 3/15/2008) // Cyberdevil's HexaList!
a long, long time ago: 60000 b/p (#2) // 36000 blams (#3) // 24000 saves (#1)