well i leveled up last week to lvl 11. I guess i'll be on lvl 12 in about 2 mouths...lol.

At 9/16/03 07:55 PM, SuperDragon wrote: well i leveled up last week to lvl 11. I guess i'll be on lvl 12 in about 2 mouths...lol.

LOL...i meant to say months and not mouths...sorry

At 9/16/03 10:23 AM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 9/15/03 06:55 PM, Jimong5 wrote: I noticed Newgrundling reached L13, congrats to him!

didn't that hapen a few weeks ago??

shouldnt have.. L 12 ends at 2919 exp, and NGling has 2930.

Hey gfoxcook, just now I checked out the Last 50 Deposits page, and I saw a user with the name 'gfox'. I just found that interesting, as it's very close to your username. If you want to pull this person's profile up their ID number is 33159.

At 9/16/03 07:55 PM, SuperDragon wrote: well i leveled up last week to lvl 11. I guess i'll be on lvl 12 in about 2 mouths...lol.

Congrats but hey, you signed up before me. hehe.

At 9/16/03 09:40 PM, Jimong5 wrote: shouldnt have.. L 12 ends at 2919 exp, and NGling has 2930.

yes be it get's higher every day to when the level 30 deposits

At 9/16/03 07:55 PM, SuperDragon wrote: well i leveled up last week to lvl 11. I guess i'll be on lvl 12 in about 2 mouths...lol.

Let me see... I levelled up to l11 going from 1612-1622 exp... I'm at 2102 now so that's 48 days, plus another 20 or so to go... will be nearer two and a half months. I don't know if I can make l13 by the end of the year. Probably not.

At 9/17/03 12:45 PM, _lightning_ wrote: yes be it get's higher every day to when the level 30 deposits

That humantarget is a plague.
Hahaha, I'm sure he's paying people to deposit for him and all. After all, all this system is so hard because of HIM ! :-O

At 9/17/03 01:01 PM, alexsmolik wrote:

At 9/17/03 12:45 PM, _lightning_ wrote: yes be it get's higher every day to when the level 30 deposits

That humantarget is a plague.
Hahaha, I'm sure he's paying people to deposit for him and all. After all, all this system is so hard because of HIM ! :-O

and the problems never ends if he would stop pimp would take his place =(

At 9/17/03 01:07 PM, _lightning_ wrote: and the problems never ends if he would stop pimp would take his place =(

And pimp would also pay people for deposits.....

At 9/17/03 01:01 PM, alexsmolik wrote: Hahaha, I'm sure he's paying people to deposit for him and all.

Now why would I go and pay people, eh.. why would he go and pay people...

-->JDOG

At 9/17/03 02:39 PM, PimpMasterJDOG wrote: Now why would I go and pay people, eh.. why would he go and pay people...

-->JDOG

you can say that all you wan but no ones going to beleave your humantarget. well me be some dumasses who just joined up =P

At 9/13/03 03:56 AM, PimpMasterDDOG wrote: I've seen spancker on MSN a few times, but I don't really enjoy talking to him...so...yeah...

I just think g, with his long spouted essays, during every reply, is more qualified as a leader. IMO.

... so my longwinded analosity is what makes me a good leader? Wow. I'll have to try promoting that quality at my next job interview. #;-}>

heh... anyway, thanks. It's nice to know that you're objective about me, despite our FIERCE MORAL BATTLES of the past... yes...

At 9/17/03 03:12 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 9/13/03 03:56 AM, PimpMasterDDOG wrote: I just think g, with his long spouted essays, during every reply, is more qualified as a leader. IMO.

... so my longwinded analosity is what makes me a good leader? Wow. I'll have to try promoting that quality at my next job interview. #;-}>

i think josh bend should be our new leader

At 9/17/03 02:43 PM, _lightning_ wrote: some dumasses who just joined up =P

Thats what I'm going for, I've said "HOW DO YOU GET BLAMS/SAVES" in some topic before... and a level 5 guy with about 30 blams/saves "explained" how to get them to me...

-->JDOG

At 9/14/03 01:50 AM, JamesTheExploiter wrote: reviews -- responses -- % reviews responded to -- name
097 -- 027 -- 27.835% -- gfoxcook
5990 -- 506 -- 8.447% -- XwaynecoltX
18 -- 006 -- 33.333% -- JamesTheExploiter

At 9/13/03 12:57 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Do i count

And here's Mr #1 Reviewer! Sure you count, but as you can see, your % is extremely low!

His % is low, yes, but 500 responses is still a lot. It just pales in comparison to his 1000s of reviews.

Gfox, I know your total number of reviews has gone up to a nice round 100, but of those your profile does not tell me how many have been replied to, so I can't put any new numbers into the above calculations. All I know is, my % is shooting up!

Sadly, I haven't had any responses lately. One of my reviews was right next to reviews with TWO responses, yet I didn't get a response. Goddamnit! Oh well. Here's an updated chart. If anyone else wants on it (or wants to update their info), reply with total reviews and responses, please:

reviews -- responses -- % reviews responded to -- name
0018 -- 006 -- 33.333% -- JamesTheExploiter
0101 -- 027 -- 26.733% -- gfoxcook
0800 -- 143 -- 17.875% -- demon0
0307 -- 054 -- 17.590% -- _lightning_
0086 -- 011 -- 12.791% -- alexsmolik
5990 -- 506 -- 08.447% -- XwaynecoltX
0500 -- 034 -- 06.800% -- jonthomson

also, I've reordered it based upon %age, since that's what we're mostly talking about here.

Now why would I go and pay people, eh.. why would he go and pay people...

-->JDOG

I really doubt that youre humantarget. And why did you change your name, twice?! TheJoe was a cool name.

At 9/14/03 02:51 AM, PimpMasterJDOG wrote:

At 9/14/03 02:46 AM, D0GMA wrote: I swung down to that end of the list a few days ago for a couple hours, then NG started lagging. After that I bagged the whole vote-up thing, since it was taking over a minute just to get one vote to process.

I just voted on about 800 128's, only 480 to go

Last I checked, 130 was almost the minimum now (Aside from new movies under 130, of course)... but our "pages cleared per day" is dropping insanely as the top end (180-199 votes) is increasingly being cleaned out with no way to get things up to 200 anymore. It really bites. I'm beginning to agree with those that were asking for liljim to change the b/p mark to 125 votes, but..

actually, it might be enough to just change it to 150 once we get everything about 150, but people have GOT to start voting on the low vote stuff, not the high vote stuff. Maybe we should ask liljim to reverse the order of the list... from 100 all the way to 199 on the last page. That might help.

reviews -- responses -- % reviews responded to -- name
0018 -- 006 -- 33.333% -- JamesTheExploiter
0101 -- 027 -- 26.733% -- gfoxcook
0800 -- 143 -- 17.875% -- demon0
0307 -- 054 -- 17.590% -- _lightning_
0086 -- 011 -- 12.791% -- alexsmolik
5990 -- 506 -- 08.447% -- XwaynecoltX
0500 -- 034 -- 06.800% -- jonthomson

Well, nice list, but your # are off, at least for me, 920 reviews, not 800. Not a problem though, its not that important that I can get pissed about it.

At 9/17/03 03:23 PM, gfoxcook wrote: but our "pages cleared per day" is dropping insanely as the top end (180-199 votes) is increasingly being cleaned out with no way to get things up to 200 anymore.

I'm only hella-active in voting on the weekends (Last weekend I voted all of the 120-somethings up to the next number, and then the next day, half of those up to the next.

At 9/17/03 03:20 PM, gfoxcook wrote: Sadly, I haven't had any responses lately. One of my reviews was right next to reviews with TWO responses, yet I didn't get a response. Goddamnit! Oh well. Here's an updated chart. If anyone else wants on it (or wants to update their info), reply with total reviews and responses, please:

me be you should post that in that review top # thread

At 9/17/03 12:26 AM, JamesTheExploiter wrote: Hey gfoxcook, just now I checked out the Last 50 Deposits page, and I saw a user with the name 'gfox'. I just found that interesting, as it's very close to your username. If you want to pull this person's profile up their ID number is 33159.

um, no it's not. 33159 is the thread ID of level up!

gfox = my alt account. I created it to hold "gfoxcook" for me when I was "gfoxclock" for Clock Day. Now he just sits there and gets exp, in case my girlfriend ever wants an account (I meant to keep it at 0 blams and 0 saves, but accidentally got a blam a couple days ago, ah well... at least I know where to check for how many people have 1 blam or save from his rank, at least).

At 9/17/03 03:32 PM, gfoxcook wrote: gfox = my alt account. I created it to hold "gfoxcook" for me when I was "gfoxclock" for Clock Day. Now he just sits there and gets exp

Thats what my alt is for... except for the exp, don't really care about that. Didn't even make a profile for it.

-->JDOG

At 9/17/03 03:24 PM, demon0 wrote:

reviews -- responses -- % reviews responded to -- name
0018 -- 006 -- 33.333% -- JamesTheExploiter
0101 -- 027 -- 26.733% -- gfoxcook
0800 -- 143 -- 17.875% -- demon0
0307 -- 054 -- 17.590% -- _lightning_
0086 -- 011 -- 12.791% -- alexsmolik
5990 -- 506 -- 08.447% -- XwaynecoltX
0500 -- 034 -- 06.800% -- jonthomson

Well, nice list, but your # are off, at least for me, 920 reviews, not 800. Not a problem though, its not that important that I can get pissed about it.

as I said in the post RIGHT before I pasted the list:

"Here's an updated chart. If anyone else wants on it (or wants to update their info), reply with total reviews and responses, please:"

I could have looked at everyone's total reviews and updated that on the list, but what would be the point? The list's point is to show how our responses relate to our reviews, and I can't find out anyone's responses if they don't tell me themselves (I'm not going to look through all 92 pages of your reviews to find out how many have responses, yaknow? #;-}>).

So if I started changing review counts but not response counts, it would just lower everyone's %, and that's no good. Better to leave it outdated, but at least CORRECT for some point in time.

So anyway, if you want me to change you to 920, you've got to tell me how many have responses, too. Hm?

At 9/17/03 03:27 PM, _lightning_ wrote: me be you should post that in that review top # thread

It doesn't have much to do with # of reviews, though. It's more about responses and the resulting %age of total reviews they yield. I don't want to clog up jon's thread with that unless he tells me to paste the list there. For one thing, this is not an official list I'm keeping up. It's inaccurate, it only features a few people that have stated what their response count is, etc. etc.... just for fun, not for seriousness, hence it being in level up! (which is where all this talk of responses vs. reviews came up in the first place! #;-}>)

At 9/17/03 03:51 PM, gfoxcook wrote: It doesn't have much to do with # of reviews, though. It's more about responses and the resulting %age of total reviews they yield. I don't want to clog up jon's thread with that unless he tells me to paste the list there. For one thing, this is not an official list I'm keeping up.

i know but seeming the poeple going to that thread like review stats more would be better and i thought me be jon would like a the review info he could find

It's inaccurate, it only features a few people that have stated what their response count is, etc. etc.... just for fun, not for seriousness

what do you mean this is a very serious thread =P

At 10/6/02 02:56 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote: IM A LEVEL 11 NOW
SO IM MAKING THIS TOPIC FOR EVERYONE THAT GOES LEVEL UP 2 LET US KNOW
AND JUST 2 TELL ALL U LEVEL 10'S AND UNDERS THAT IM HIGHER THEN U!!
LOL

well YOU, can stop your bitching. there is no doubt, it is a good thing to level up, but boasting to members who simply havent been on NG as long as you have is just sad.

At 9/17/03 04:14 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 9/17/03 03:51 PM, gfoxcook wrote: It doesn't have much to do with # of reviews, though. It's more about responses and the resulting %age of total reviews they yield. I don't want to clog up jon's thread with that unless he tells me to paste the list there. For one thing, this is not an official list I'm keeping up.

i know but seeming the poeple going to that thread like review stats more would be better and i thought me be jon would like a the review info he could find

Well, perhaps, perhaps. Like I said, I'll post it there if he asks me to. But I ain't holding my breath. #;-}>

It's inaccurate, it only features a few people that have stated what their response count is, etc. etc.... just for fun, not for seriousness

what do you mean this is a very serious thread =P

I said the little response % list isn't serious, not this thread. But come on. #;-}>

At 9/17/03 04:27 PM, mrjam640 wrote:

At 10/6/02 02:56 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote: IM A LEVEL 11 NOW
SO IM MAKING THIS TOPIC FOR EVERYONE THAT GOES LEVEL UP 2 LET US KNOW
AND JUST 2 TELL ALL U LEVEL 10'S AND UNDERS THAT IM HIGHER THEN U!!
LOL

well YOU, can stop your bitching. there is no doubt, it is a good thing to level up, but boasting to members who simply havent been on NG as long as you have is just sad.

READ... THE... TIME... STAMP... GOD... DAMN... IT!

you're almost a year late with that reply.

as I said in the post RIGHT before I pasted the list:

"Here's an updated chart. If anyone else wants on it (or wants to update their info), reply with total reviews and responses, please:"

So anyway, if you want me to change you to 920, you've got to tell me how many have responses, too. Hm?

Sorry about that. No its alright you dont have to update anything, or go out of your way, Ive been a pain already.

At 9/17/03 04:37 PM, demon0 wrote:

as I said in the post RIGHT before I pasted the list:

"Here's an updated chart. If anyone else wants on it (or wants to update their info), reply with total reviews and responses, please:"

So anyway, if you want me to change you to 920, you've got to tell me how many have responses, too. Hm?

Sorry about that. No its alright you dont have to update anything, or go out of your way, Ive been a pain already.

Up to 604/42 now... I've slowed down a bit, what with creating the list (now around 270 people) and IE giving me random WSOD's when loading flash meaning I can't load some flash (esp. stuff in the <200 list). I've had at least two reviews with responses deleted recently.

At 9/17/03 04:35 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

Hoow do I rank among the you with the review and response ratio????.........