err tyrant i wasnt fighting i was trying to get you to understand that the old ussr is dead its supporters desrted it the only way for the revolution to survive is to unite and adapt in a few decades maybe we can storm the gates but not in todays political climate also there is no such thing as a communist mafia accept it its a simply fact

but i wish to remain friends so i'll leave with these words
socalism will never die it just didnt work THIS TIME ROUND (said the day the wall fell

p.s you dont have the rank requried to accept new recruits you qualify for promotion so ask and i'll make it offical.ohh and why do you still have a hitler sig

At 9/18/05 10:57 AM, marchingtyrants wrote:

At 9/18/05 10:54 AM, redglare1 wrote: p.s you dont have the rank requried to accept new recruits you qualify for promotion so ask and i'll make it offical.ohh and why do you still have a hitler sig

i have owls for a sig..... and i'll ask for a promotion if general bison gets here.

I'd approve of the promotion - and also, the sig is much better...

At 9/18/05 10:17 AM, redglare1 wrote:

At 9/18/05 09:46 AM, Nomader wrote:

At 9/18/05 09:21 AM, Emumember wrote: Can I join?

You have my vote for approval - so right now you can consider yourself an "unoffical" member (you need the other 3 generals' approval at this point)

of course you can join if you promise to post often we'll start you off with 1st class pprivate and nomader you have the power to accept people on your own just make sure they'll post often and saithead it looks like you want to join do you?

I'm back. So here is the list. But first, I (GeneralMBison) here by make marchingtyrants from the rank of Sergeant Major to the rank of Major General.

Ranks (This will update a lot of times):
Supreme Commander: GeneralMBison (founder)
General: redglare1, ChurroNG
Lieutenant General: Nomader
Major General: marchingtyrants
Brigadier General:
Colonel:
Lieutenant Colonel:
Major:
Captain: seventy-one
Lieutenant:
Second Lieutenant:
Sergeant Major:
Master Sergeant:
First Sergeant:
Gunnery Sergeant:
Staff Sergeant:
Sergeant:
Corporal:
Lance Corporal:
Private First Class: Emumember
Private: KjartanT, -bloodskater, thegodofwolves

In Tuseday I'll add so more topics to be posted about.

For now, *random but oh well*, General, may I suggest not deleting the privates?

At 9/18/05 01:32 PM, Nomader wrote: For now, *random but oh well*, General, may I suggest not deleting the privates?

dont see why not they all deserted and weres churro havnt heard from him recently

also heres a topic to get us through tuesday

what weapon do you think is the best in a war

for me its the ak itsimpossible to break in an accident and can be used in all terains even underwater its fought revolutions coups and cuvil wars i saw a fighter with dead rats in the firing chamber and it still worked

At 9/19/05 11:16 AM, redglare1 wrote:

At 9/18/05 01:32 PM, Nomader wrote: For now, *random but oh well*, General, may I suggest not deleting the privates?

dont see why not they all deserted and weres churro havnt heard from him recently

Here I am! Sorry I haven't been here for a while, but now I'm back.

also heres a topic to get us through tuesday

what weapon do you think is the best in a war

I think that it depends on which type of enemy you're facing. But in something like World War 1 anything with a fast fire rate would be effective.

At 9/15/05 11:16 AM, marchingtyrants wrote: hey what about me? i was o-ne of the first to join this club.... ishould be the major or colonel or something.

(intense anger)

Now I am pissed. redglare1 did say that you've got to post in order to gain rank and I completely agree. You deserve severe court marshall for not reading the earlier pages. And you were lucky to have came back when you did, or you're account would have been deleted.

(/intense anger)

Sorry for the double-post.

At 9/19/05 11:16 AM, redglare1 wrote:
what weapon do you think is the best in a war

The most affective is the hydrogen bomb, but the weapon that had the most impact in any war would probably be the catupult, or maybe the cannon.

what type of catapult anyway good to see you again 71

At 9/19/05 06:10 PM, redglare1 wrote: what type of catapult anyway good to see you again 71

Not really a catupult, but the trevache (sp?) had a major impact.

Good to be back.

At 9/19/05 06:15 PM, seventy-one wrote:

At 9/19/05 06:10 PM, redglare1 wrote: what type of catapult anyway good to see you again 71

Not really a catupult, but the trevache (sp?) had a major impact.

Good to be back.

ahh the french one well it wasnt very powerful in the conventional sense but it was perfect for biological warfare they usually slung rotten animal carcases over the walls to spread diese(not sure how you spell that)

Here is some new topics:

Which gun do you think is good for a war?

What type of guns would you go for? Pistols, Rockets, Machines, Shotguns, Rifles or Snipers.

At 9/19/05 10:32 PM, GeneralMBison wrote:
Which gun do you think is good for a war?

Is it sort of like the previous question, as which gun was the most effective? If so, then hands down the Kentucky Long Rifle it won the Revolution.

...so, could i join then?

At 9/19/05 10:32 PM, GeneralMBison wrote: Here is some new topics:

Which gun do you think is good for a war?

What type of guns would you go for? Pistols, Rockets, Machines, Shotguns, Rifles or Snipers.

I would go for uzis but if their not allowed I'll choose snipers. Uzis aren't really suited for war anyway. Though you can't afford to waste all your snipers by throwing them out on the front line, though. The most effective way to use a sniper is to hide him so the enemy won't know they're being targeted.

At 9/19/05 11:06 PM, SHAITH_HEAD wrote: ...so, could i join then?

sure if you promise to post often you can be sergent major or somthing the commander will decide later

At 9/19/05 10:32 PM, GeneralMBison wrote: Here is some new topics:

Which gun do you think is good for a war?

I'd definitly go for the good ol' handy dandy M16 - it's an all around weapon, can be switched to burst or auto, and is great for range.

i dont know the m4 is fast replacing the m16 still cant beat an ak though

I'm a fan of the M1 garand, it just feels (in video games) better.

At 9/20/05 06:45 PM, seventy-one wrote: I'm a fan of the M1 garand, it just feels (in video games) better.

seventy-one - I cannot stress this enough - make your next post in the Wi/Ht? level up lounge. Go!

At 9/19/05 11:06 PM, SHAITH_HEAD wrote: ...so, could i join then?

Yes, you are in the crew. Now I, GeneralMBison, Supreme Commander of the War Crew, hear by make seventy-one to the rank of Brigadier General. Here is the update on the ranks:

Ranks (This will update a lot of times):
Supreme Commander: GeneralMBison (founder)
General: redglare1, ChurroNG
Lieutenant General: Nomader
Major General: marchingtyrants
Brigadier General:
Colonel:
Lieutenant Colonel:
Major:
Captain: seventy-one
Lieutenant:
Second Lieutenant:
Sergeant Major:
Master Sergeant:
First Sergeant:
Gunnery Sergeant:
Staff Sergeant:
Sergeant:
Corporal:
Lance Corporal:
Private First Class: Emumember
Private: KjartanT, -bloodskater, thegodofwolves, SHAITH_HEAD

At 9/20/05 07:06 PM, GeneralMBison wrote:

At 9/19/05 11:06 PM, SHAITH_HEAD wrote: ...so, could i join then?

Yes, you are in the crew. Now I, GeneralMBison, Supreme Commander of the War Crew, hear by make seventy-one to the rank of Brigadier General. Here is the update on the ranks:

Brigadier General:
Captain: seventy-one

You need to um... move him to Brigadier General... just a suggestion...

hey nomader 71 how you guys get a 5 xp?|

At 9/21/05 12:44 PM, redglare1 wrote: hey nomader 71 how you guys get a 5 xp?|

*sigh...*

It's the most annoying thing ever. I can never reach 1,000 etc.

This is why.

When I signed up, instead of checking no boxes for newsletters and such (via. email), or checking all boxes (would give 10 exp), I checked... one box (5 exp points)

It all has to do with when you make an account. So I shall always have this on my account... *sighs*

At first when i read the title i thought this was just some club that talked about how cool war is. I took a look at your posts and i am intrested in joining. I'd like to point out something about WW2 i find that alot of the countries who put huge efforts into defeating facism and fighting Nazi Germany, Mussoluni Italy and Imperial JApan where largely ignored. I happen to be a canadian and my grandfather was in WWII as an artillery officer on D-day so it would bother me more directly. At the moment im in a International School In Istanbul that uses British Textbooks.I was reading the history boo today and It just annoys me how unwilling they are to mention Canadas war effort What they mentioned in the text book was "British, north american and Commonwealth troops attacked on d day"

Before i countinue heres some facts about it:

500,000 people in uniform by the end of the war out of a population of 11,000,000

The First assult on the Alantic Wall was in 1942 was performed by several regiments of the 2nd Division methinks and 4 companies of British Comandos. (i was in the Imperial War museum in London and there was an american magazine of the time its headline read "we and the British Assult france" The fact was there were 32 american soldiers invovlved.

Canadian 1st army landed at D-day, fought in France, Belgium, and liberated much of Holand. then In the Rhineland.

1st canadian corps fought in Italy.

Commonwealth Air Training Plan which trained 50, 000 Allied pilots was run by and in Canada.

Also the Navy was responsible for Half the Atlantic for 3 years. Im not sure on naval statistics so i wont go there.

Also im unsure about war manufaction numbers.

Also The war efforts of Australia and New Zealand are ignored jsut as much. If you feel the same way as i do tell me. I just dont ike seeing my grandfathers sarifices and acomplishments ignored nor the sacrifices of all his comrades ignored either.

1 more thing. If you ask me who won the war i'd say it has to be Russia

At 9/20/05 06:49 PM, Nomader wrote:

At 9/20/05 06:45 PM, seventy-one wrote: I'm a fan of the M1 garand, it just feels (in video games) better.

seventy-one - I cannot stress this enough - make your next post in the Wi/Ht? level up lounge. Go!

Sorry about that, I was waiting for something big to post in, then I just said fuck it and posted in the first thread that I had an urge to post in.

Sorry for the double post....

At 9/21/05 06:02 PM, seventy-one wrote:

At 9/20/05 06:49 PM, Nomader wrote:

At 9/20/05 06:45 PM, seventy-one wrote: I'm a fan of the M1 garand, it just feels (in video games) better.

seventy-one - I cannot stress this enough - make your next post in the Wi/Ht? level up lounge. Go!

Sorry about that, I was waiting for something big to post in, then I just said fuck it and posted in the first thread that I had an urge to post in.

I just realized you said the level up lounge, I'll post in it when I move up a rank in bp points, which should be now.........

At 9/20/05 07:31 PM, Nomader wrote:

At 9/20/05 07:06 PM, GeneralMBison wrote:

At 9/19/05 11:06 PM, SHAITH_HEAD wrote: ...so, could i join then?

Yes, you are in the crew. Now I, GeneralMBison, Supreme Commander of the War Crew, hear by make seventy-one to the rank of Brigadier General. Here is the update on the ranks:

Brigadier General:
Captain: seventy-one

You need to um... move him to Brigadier General... just a suggestion...

Whoops! Next time I update the ranks his name will be in the Brigadier General area.

At 9/21/05 03:31 PM, canada_rocker wrote:

Also The war efforts of Australia and New Zealand are ignored jsut as much. If you feel the same way as i do tell me. I just dont ike seeing my grandfathers sarifices and acomplishments ignored nor the sacrifices of all his comrades ignored either.

I agree, the Anzacs did do well but were largely ignored because everyone was to busy looking at the achievements of USA and UK.

1 more thing. If you ask me who won the war i'd say it has to be Russia

I agree, Stalingrad was <quote>" the beginning of the end for the Nazis" </quote>
Apparently 200,000 Nazis and 1,000,000 Soviets died in that battle.

So do you want to join?

yep i'd be glad to. Thanks for including me, and sry for getting you off topic you were talking about which weapon was the most important in conflict or something. One of you said the kentucky long rifle. Personally i disagree with that.m The contienental army didn;t win the war because of the rifle it actually had little to do with their victory. I think the reasons for american victory where atributed to the distance between britain and the 13 colonies. Also Britains armies were in no state to fight a war. The americans won because of their numerical suporiority and they were fighting on their own soil. They disnt have trsupply problems such as the british expirenced and they had were able to make dicesions much more efficently than the british