At 9/22/05 07:46 PM, liljim wrote:
Whut? You were neither. I haven't responded to the majority of posts in this thread, that doesn't mean that I haven't read or taken stock of them.
True, but again, and no offense, this wasn't a question only you could have answered. Anyone who has been reading the thread could have easily told me about the Search Revision on the first page that apparently is in the works/being considered.
I was going to search through it in the begining, and am about to anyway now, but the reason i didn't earlier was because of how tiring it would be, this topic being full of large posts and Ctrl+F presumably useless, as I expected to see posts along the lines of "Search through the topic. It's already been suggested," etc. to be in high quanity.
I am being a bit demanding, I see now, but I did I expected some sort of response in four days, I must admit.
I've told you, I read everything in this thread. Your idea hasn't changed, you just elaborated on it the second time around. If I didn't understand you the first time, I would have left a note at the time I first read it.
Where are you seeing this idea of mine? I still don't get it. I just searched through this entire topic and the only idea I posted before this one was one for bottom-page navigation on the forums.
This post...
At 9/18/05 08:46 PM, Pure_LionHeart wrote:
I noticed an "Advanced BBS Search" is still under contemplation, according to the first post in the topic. I'm just curios if it's already been rejected/accepted and maybe some details. I was going to make a suggestion regarding little search change, but I don't want to rehash old ideas.
...is not an idea. I clearly state that I am curious about information on the search update since it is already mentioned on the first page of the topic. I mention I have an idea, but I said nothing of it at all. It isn't an idea. Even were it to be construed as one, I think my elaboration would have been welcomed, instead of me just saying "change the search" or whatever.