BOUT TIME WE DID SOMTHING ABOUT THESE ASSHOLES!!!

At 12/6/04 06:42 PM, SlyTom202 wrote: BOUT TIME WE DID SOMTHING ABOUT THESE ASSHOLES!!!

Sounds like one little rebel has had too many movies blammed.

Wade Fulp scares me....

Wade, i am the one who you e-mailed
and two words
Thank you!

)

At 12/6/04 06:43 PM, Pilot-Doofy wrote:

At 12/6/04 06:42 PM, SlyTom202 wrote: BOUT TIME WE DID SOMTHING ABOUT THESE ASSHOLES!!!

Sounds like one little rebel has had too many movies blammed.

actually nope, dont do flash. just still art.... but iv seen good entrys be thrown away, fightin for the flashers

I was just on the verge of humping Wade's leg. Alot of crap Flash (Mine included, needless to say), have passed judgment. All the people who watch the Flash and vote to blam it are stripped of a BLAM point each time this happens. And the same for quality Flash, which is suffering greatly due to the carelessness of others. Hopefully the new changes will fix this. We shall wait and see. o_O

So do we have to watch the WHOLE movie?

Because once I see a stick figure movie AND the person doesnt have any movies submitted AND theres no icon AND theres no preloader.

I just blam it :P

Is that cool? I don't want my points deleted lol ^__________^

At 12/6/04 06:58 PM, Yoshi-1up wrote: So do we have to watch the WHOLE movie?

Because once I see a stick figure movie AND the person doesnt have any movies submitted AND theres no icon AND theres no preloader.

I just blam it :P

Is that cool? I don't want my points deleted lol ^__________^

id like to know the same thing, somtimes iv seen the movie allready submitted and vote on it half way through

At 12/6/04 06:26 PM, WadeFulp wrote: Most sites like Newgrounds.com already do this, so I don't see what the big fucking deal is. Log in if you don't want to see it, don't expect us to remove it becuase you're to fucking lazy to log in.

i never said i didn't want to see it, but thanks for hurting my feelings with your obscene and unnecessary words. i actually enjoy its nice little music clip and fade in. i was asking why it was there, that's all. no need to go into attack mode.

At 12/6/04 06:32 PM, Bob_Friskit wrote: look; maybe some of your "daily toons" are good, I wouldn't know cause I have seen any, but how do the crappy ones pass judgement if people out there aren't mass voting??

they actually suck, but that's not what i'm trying to prove. there are (at the most) 7 or 8 active star syndicate members on at a time. even if we went out of our way to gather up every possible member we could to be ready for a toon which we were about to submit, there would probably be only about 30 people ready to vote. it's impossible, really.

also, there's just no reason for us to waste our time gathering people up at different times each day for a stupid dailytoon. they're just for fum! it's not like we're putting something world moving onto newgrounds. like i said, we aren't stealing awards by use of any type of mass voting from people who deserve them more than us, nor are we trying to take over newgrounds with our shitty flash. just relax, vote 0 or whatever you want to vote on them, and move on. the same goes for the anti-toon clubs which are aparently forming now. mass voting on a shitty cartoon to get it blammed is still mass voting.

that's all i can say.

At 12/6/04 05:55 PM, Canadian-Beer wrote: why not have the vote bar attached to the flash file? then you have to see the whole god damn animation and the vote on it

thats not a bad idea.... although it may be tricky. like in places where you might want to go back to one part (scene selection) b4 deciding on what ur vote should be...

hmm....what about this?

i gotta question, if im in a rish, and gotta deposit quick, am i aloud to go to submissons i already veiwed, like some on the top 50, and vote on them without watching them again

and i know how you said your watching who is voting 0 all the time, well i practically do vote zero alot on the underjudment movies, but i do watch them, and they deserve it, is this ok, i vote fair on fair submissons though, and i always watch the whole thing before voting

At 12/6/04 11:08 AM, pythagoras- wrote:
You say this is where a submission really deserves a fair vote, yet this is where users are rewarded for voting one way or another.

You havent been around since yesterday, and you have your own respectable site, so you should what your talking about.

If I vote Five on "LOLWTFPORNGAMES" and It is a Removeable score, I do NOT get rewarded.

If I read what you said wrong, elaborate.

At 12/6/04 06:44 PM, TheChaosDemon wrote: Wade Fulp scares me....

It's ok, he's not a pedophile. He's not going to hurt you.

At 12/6/04 06:33 PM, -Gooie- wrote:

At 12/6/04 11:45 AM, liljim wrote: Is that right.

yeah, it really is. God forbid I have standards that I hold people's work to. If I don't see it, I blam it. Besides, I highly doubt that's even my voting rank. I don't even vote 5 or 0, so nice try

You stupid ass. LilJim is not the type of person who would make up a graphic to pretend we aren't tracking your stats. I should terminate your worthless account just for doubting anything he says. We have many different stats logged. The particular graphic LilJim showed you was a listing of under judgment entries you have voted on. However, most of those entries you saw were entries that have been flagged for review, and could be a month old or more. At the time LilJim screen grabbed that, there may not have been any entries under judgment, so the entries in your listen were all old. This doesn't mean we don't have other logs showing your voting history, it was just an example.

At 12/6/04 07:02 PM, madhatt3r wrote:
also, there's just no reason for us to waste our time gathering people up at different times each day for a stupid dailytoon. they're just for fum! it's not like we're putting something world moving onto newgrounds. like i said, we aren't stealing awards by use of any type of mass voting from people who deserve them more than us, nor are we trying to take over newgrounds with our shitty flash. just relax, vote 0 or whatever you want to vote on them, and move on.

I like Daily Toons, and I fully back the Star Syndicate up on the fact that there is NO mass voting going on involving them.

And even if something was happening, like Hatter said, at most they would have 30 members on. thats only like, 35% of the votes needed to pass.

People vote higher on DailyToons, because they are pointless, but funny as hell.

OK WHAT THE HELL?

At 12/6/04 07:28 PM, WadeFulp wrote: You stupid ass.

Sorry, I'll vote conservative next time.

LilJim is not the type of person who would make up a graphic to pretend we aren't tracking your stats.

With the history of our run-ins, I wouldn't put it past him.

I should terminate your worthless account just for doubting anything he says.

Wrongful termination. that's cute.

We have many different stats logged.

Yeah, the thing is, I don't remember that at all, so either it was an error, or someone is using my name after me. Come to think of it, I let my students use it so maybe they are voting, too. I told them not to. Oh well.

Either way, Wade, you're being abrasive, sporadic and harsh.

At 12/6/04 07:02 PM, madhatt3r wrote: i never said i didn't want to see it, but thanks for hurting my feelings with your obscene and unnecessary words. i actually enjoy its nice little music clip and fade in. i was asking why it was there, that's all. no need to go into attack mode.

Sorry, I didn't think I could hurt the feelings of someone, with my silly words, who has a picture of a girl with a face full of cum as their profile image.

So now you enjoy the NG intro Flash? Funny, from your initial comment about it I was under the impression you didn't like it:

"what's with the new NG logo before every flash that comes up before the actual preloader, but only if you're not logged in? the only problem i have with this is that i rarely log in, spare to deposit a couple of times a month, or to post something, and i noticed that it can sometimes ruin the mood of a flash."

At 12/6/04 07:32 PM, BonusStage wrote: Today has been a great day to begin to vote fairly all the time, i've gotten AT LEAST 5 more saves and a couple more blams due to it, YEAH FOR LETTING IT LOAD :D

In the end it benefits everyone.

-You get to see more movies, and even if it is crap, you can laugh at how terrible it is

-The flash artist has a better chance of getting a fairer vote to get acrosss the portal

At 12/6/04 07:34 PM, -Gooie- wrote: Yeah, the thing is, I don't remember that at all, so either it was an error, or someone is using my name after me. Come to think of it, I let my students use it so maybe they are voting, too. I told them not to. Oh well.

Wade and Liljim would not lie about an issue as small as this. As a newbie html/php coder, I can see that NG was very well built and they probably log the smallest stuff like what time you signed on/off (if they have the storage space).

Shut up, Wadolf.

At 12/6/04 07:51 PM, ForrestKnight wrote: Shut up, Wadolf.

Thats ignorant.

But it should be heeded.

I gave myself a dark aura, but I tend to be fair according to my own standards. I'm going to vote according to the way I want to vote.

I'm going to vote zeros on movies that I don't like. I'm going to try to blam sprite movies that many would feel are decent enough to pass, because I don't like sprites. (There are exceptions, I often can tell the better ones from the crappier ones and I vote 2's and 3's on those that usually make it onto the daily top 5.) I vote zeros on flashes that have below-average graphics or no preloader orsound. I also vote zeros on mediocre flashes, knowing that they very likely would get passed. I also vote zeros on top50 entries because that I think do not deserve being in the top 50.

Is that ok?

At 12/6/04 07:34 PM, -Gooie- wrote: Either way, Wade, you're being abrasive, sporadic and harsh.

Yeah, and you're being a pain in the ass. Keep in mind you started up with me by bringing my political views into this. Let's look at some of the things you've said and see who is really being the asshole:

"Besides, I highly doubt that's even my voting rank. I don't even vote 5 or 0, so nice try"

then you state:

"Come to think of it, I let my students use it so maybe they are voting, too."

However, you fail to apologize for basically calling LilJim a liar. Maybe YOU didn't vote that way, but if your students are using YOUR account to vote that way we can only assume it is YOU. You are responsible for the activity that takes place from your account.

"Wade is being such a dick to me. He explained that the picture liljim used wasn't accurate of my posts, but he said he wants to terminate my account. This wouldn't be the first time he's pulled something like that.

Yeah, I still remember him doing it years ago and I hate him for it."

My suggestion of terminating your account, which is really just me fucking with you and joking around, had nothing to do with your voting record, it had to do with the fact that you are calling us liars and when we try and present you with facts you doubt them and take shots at our credibility.

Some of your comments about LilJim, who is one of the finest people I have ever met:

"He's full of shit because I never vote 5 or zero. I always put 4 or 1, unless I really like the flash."

Then of course from your first post, after I warned people that we are watching, and we are, you come up with:

"I highly doubt that, Wade-poo. Mostly everyone does it, and no, this isn't a confession."

So if the police come out and say "We will be watching highway so and so from December 12th to the 14th" would you say to them: "I highly doubt that, everyone speeds through there, not that I do of course!" ?? The police have the technology to catch speeders, but they can't be everywhere at once, and now and then they make a big effort to crack down on problem areas.

We are doing the same thing. We've let this problem go for a while, and I decided it was time to crack down. We've always had the technology to do it, we just have been to busy with other things.

So why don't you take your typical liberal conspiracy theories and shove them up your ass.

Sorry if you feel I'm being mean to you, but I don't care for people who call me a liar and talk shit about my friends.

Just a question - if i've seen the movie and voted on it, can I vote again without having to rewatch it?

For instance, I voted "Dad's Home" a 5 a couple of days ago without watching it because i've seen it before...so is that a no with the new system?

At 12/6/04 08:09 PM, cjrs wrote: Just a question - if i've seen the movie and voted on it, can I vote again without having to rewatch it?

For instance, I voted "Dad's Home" a 5 a couple of days ago without watching it because i've seen it before...so is that a no with the new system?

Its a great movie, and deserves the recognition.

The point of this topic is the people that vote Zero or Five, based on what the person has posted prior, as opposed to viewing the movie and voting fairly.

Wade you really opened the light for me,now i understand how hard flash artists work on their movies (some of them) im just so used to idiots making bullshit accounts on 1,000s of accounts just to make blam points for their REAL accounts but ill make sure to watch all of the movies from now on,unless its a bullshit stick flash ^_^ thanx again wade for showing the good and the truth to me

At 12/6/04 08:09 PM, cjrs wrote: Just a question - if i've seen the movie and voted on it, can I vote again without having to rewatch it?

I said it before, and I'll say it AGAIN. This only applies to entries that are under judgment. If the movie isn't under judgment and you want to come back and vote on it without watching it, that's fine.

Gooie doesn't respond well to criticism }8-}

That made my day, wade.