WADE!!!! IF A SUBMITION IS SENT TWICE BECAUSE IT WAS BLAMMED BEFOR, AND U REALIZE ITS THE SAME SUBMISSION, CAN U IMEDDIATLY BLAM OR PROTECT IT????
WADE!!!! IF A SUBMITION IS SENT TWICE BECAUSE IT WAS BLAMMED BEFOR, AND U REALIZE ITS THE SAME SUBMISSION, CAN U IMEDDIATLY BLAM OR PROTECT IT????
Oh wade, since you online, could you have a look at my Movie , it was flagged unfairly, its not real porn!! thanks <3
LSD!
At 12/6/04 09:50 PM, SlyTom202 wrote: WADE!!!! IF A SUBMITION IS SENT TWICE BECAUSE IT WAS BLAMMED BEFOR, AND U REALIZE ITS THE SAME SUBMISSION, CAN U IMEDDIATLY BLAM OR PROTECT IT????
haha, how many times was that answered. Just check for any improvement, if it's the same, vote what you voted.
If it has some improvement, judge it again and vote what it deserves.
Believe or not, some blammed flashes which are submitted again were improved.
At 12/6/04 09:36 PM, -Gooie- wrote: Well, you COULD have done something, like emailed me about this instead of going out on a limb to make it into a "Gooe vs. the Admins" flame, but whatever.
Oh, I see. So it's okay for you to insult us and screw with us in public, but in order to respond back at you we have to do it privately?
If you try to make us look like idiots in public with baseless accusations we are going to tear you apart publicly.
Now, let it be known I don't hold grudges and if you stop taking cheap shots at me, and other NG admins, I will forget this and have no issue with you.
I guess I shouldn't be worried about this safety measure... I usually take a few seconds (5-15) before blamming, but sometimes the graphics are just TOO horrible. (beyond salvation, even if it has the best plot ever, it won't save the movie)
I wonder if Wade has ever went into my log to see if I've been bad. (probably)
At 12/6/04 09:50 PM, Mr_Fluffykins wrote: Oh wade, since you online, could you have a look at my Movie , it was flagged unfairly, its not real porn!! thanks <3
I just set all whistle entries to be cleared tomorrow morning. So resubmit it once you get the notice it has been removed.
At 12/6/04 09:44 PM, Dobio wrote: lol Gooie, you should throw in the towel. Fighting admins is bound to get you shot or something. O:-)
lol you do have a point Dobio,fighting with the administratiors is like arguring with the cops YOU WONT WIN lol
Wade you guys should have a warning system set up to crack down on people who create mass accounts and break other rules
At 12/6/04 09:56 PM, WadeFulp wrote:At 12/6/04 09:50 PM, Mr_Fluffykins wrote: Oh wade, since you online, could you have a look at my Movie , it was flagged unfairly, its not real porn!! thanks <3I just set all whistle entries to be cleared tomorrow morning. So resubmit it once you get the notice it has been removed.
oh no i will not resubmit it, its horrible, it was just a joke, so thanks goodnight<3
LSD!
O great Wade,
I just have one question:
I hate the Star Syndicate for obvious reasons (stupid crappy daily toons) and I try everyday to blam their movies, but they still get about 2.3, am I wrong to vote 0?
At 12/6/04 09:58 PM, soulrifter wrote: Hmm, ok then. I was just hoping you would take the time to individually email offenders. Thanks.
If I see questionable activity I would most likely send a warning. I have sent warnings in the past to people.
At 12/6/04 10:01 PM, NazelbikAuthor wrote: O great Wade,
I just have one question:
I hate the Star Syndicate for obvious reasons (stupid crappy daily toons) and I try everyday to blam their movies, but they still get about 2.3, am I wrong to vote 0?
I haven't seen many of these yet, but the one I saw wasn't blam material. Some maybe, some may not be. So you should watch enough of them to determine if they should stay or go. As long as they are taking Portal awards they don't deserve, I'm not to worried about them.
At 12/6/04 10:06 PM, WadeFulp wrote: As long as they aren't taking Portal awards they don't deserve, I'm not to worried about them.
Which begs the question about way back in January when illwillpress won the turd of the week award. Will there be something done about such widespread abuse of the system?
They DO deserve ONE portal award though: the "Turd Of The Week" award.
At 12/6/04 10:06 PM, WadeFulp wrote: I haven't seen many of these yet, but the one I saw wasn't blam material. Some maybe, some may not be. So you should watch enough of them to determine if they should stay or go. As long as they are taking Portal awards they don't deserve, I'm not to worried about them.
I gotta admit Wade, that some of the Daily Toons are blamworthy
<---- One of the few people who collab them
But some are worthy of passing.
It's because that there are the blam/protect consciece people around who are voting to protect them, despite how poor they might be.
Surely enough, the star syndicate gets accused of 'mass voting' (which I feel is a damn stupid term/accusation).
Theyre not passing because we have a shit load of members voting them through, there's only about 30 members in total, most being inactive, and 1/3 of the actives living in Australia.
No, they are not winning unfair awards, so i really dont see any problem.
At 12/6/04 08:17 PM, -Michael- wrote: Gooie what have you've done?! You've ticked off Wade with your prepubescent whining!
I'm older than you >:(
You'll be happy to know that Ruby Tuesday's fired me. Great idea, Mike.
Come on Gooie, get in your bear suit.
1) that's a high school picture of me
2) fix my blog >:(
At 12/6/04 08:16 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Gooie doesn't respond well to criticism }8-}
After you get laid off, you aren't really in a bad mood.
That made my day, wade.
I'm glad.
Wade and Jim, I sent you an email.
At 12/6/04 09:50 PM, SlyTom202 wrote: WADE!!!! IF A SUBMITION IS SENT TWICE BECAUSE IT WAS BLAMMED BEFOR, AND U REALIZE ITS THE SAME SUBMISSION, CAN U IMEDDIATLY BLAM OR PROTECT IT????
If you read the whole topic you would allready know the answer to this. I will quote Wade response to my question earlier. Look back at the bottom of page 4 for the whole Q and A post.
At 12/6/04 11:24 AM, WadeFulp wrote: You should watch it to see if the author made any improvements. However common sense comes in to play here. If it's blammed and the author resubmits it minutes later, he probably didn 't change anything, but you never know if the author was making improvements while his entry was under judgment for several hours, or wahtever. So you should check for improvements. If you keep blamming their stuff, they will get banned for 30 days. If they start up from another account it's probably best to just keep blamming.
I think that clears that up quite well.
I will admit, I have given out 1's before, and I have given out the occasional 5, but I tend to vote (when I do, which is very rarely) mor ein the middle I think. I just gave something a 0 though, but purely because of the fact the screen was far too small, a profile pic is much bigger even, how can you play the game, or see it.
Bellum omnium contra omnes
Finally! All those dumbass people who submit gay content that should have a negative score that get in the 1.0-3.0 range, ITS REDICULOUS.
I know some you should ban already, some of the star syndicate!
At 12/6/04 10:11 PM, Evark wrote:At 12/6/04 10:06 PM, WadeFulp wrote: As long as they aren't taking Portal awards they don't deserve, I'm not to worried about them.Which begs the question about way back in January when illwillpress won the turd of the week award. Will there be something done about such widespread abuse of the system?
The only award that movie deserved, was turd of the week.
That movie was just horrible. There was no way any group of persons could have voted it down several thousand times.
... LOL WOW this signature is ancient.
At 12/6/04 07:35 PM, WadeFulp wrote: So now you enjoy the NG intro Flash? Funny, from your initial comment about it I was under the impression you didn't like it:
i said "and i noticed that it can sometimes ruin the mood of a flash." that is hardly 'THAT THING IS HORRIBLE I HATE IT GET RID OF IT". i also believe that salt tastes bad, ruins the mood, if you will, on salad, but that doesn't mean i don't put it on my fries. the ng intro flash is nice in it's own little sense, but sometimes, sometimes, it can deter from the mood of the flash.
Sorry, I didn't think I could hurt the feelings of someone, with my silly words, who has a picture of a girl with a face full of cum as their profile image.
faces full of cum are god's gift to wanting mouths. bad words, however, are the devil.
ps it's actually soap but nice to see you've got cumshots on the mind wade.
.
Yeah. It's still a mystery how SS gets away with scores higher than a 2. Bigger a mystery than who killed Kennedy. (lol)
At 12/6/04 11:20 PM, madhatt3r wrote:
faces full of cum are god's gift to wanting mouths. bad words, however, are the devil.
ps it's actually soap but nice to see you've got cumshots on the mind wade.
Is that Avril Lavigne? (or whatever the hell that fucking canadians name is)
... LOL WOW this signature is ancient.
At 12/6/04 11:09 PM, DarkArchon wrote: That movie was just horrible. There was no way any group of persons could have voted it down several thousand times.
It was almost completely on par with the series, yet every other one gets more distinguished and prestigous awards than that one. (I should know, I just watched it again). Even if the abuse isn't in apparent in this movie being voted to turd of the week, then the abuse is certainly present in every other illwillpress movie being voted to the other awards.
Not that it matters, the impression I get is that his flash movies are just supposed to be comics with a slight amount of motion given to them. I wouldn't call them awesome, but they are certainly unique and original. I definitely don't hate them.
At 12/6/04 11:20 PM, madhatt3r wrote: ps it's actually soap but nice to see you've got cumshots on the mind wade.
I think it was the 'HORNY TEENS 4 HOT COCK' that threw him off. ;D
I would just like to announce I've warned 4 users so far. I basically told them to check the front page news regarding Portal abuse, but didn't come out and say they were being abusive, but they were trending in that direction.
I just won't vote on things I don't like. I'm not gonna' sit there and watch some 10-15 min. piece of garbage while I could be watching something I like.
i think its good that you are cracking down on some of these fools, i mean, people will blam movies just because an author has no previous submissions, how fucking encouraging
I don't like you.
I think you should compile a list and publish it as a top 50 portal cheaters list.
would be the best list ever.
seriously.